Bill Commons

CA SB 1011

introduced

Energy: Utility Infrastructure AI Safety, Oversight, and Workforce Protection Act.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA SB 1011 pass?

Not yet. CA SB 1011 has been introduced but has not advanced to a vote. Latest recorded action (2026-05-28): Ordered to inactive file on request of Senator McNerney.

What is CA SB 1011 about?

Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission with regulatory jurisdiction over public utilities, including electrical corporations and gas corporations, while local publicly owned electric utilities are under the direction of their governing boards. Existing law requires every public utility to furnish and maintain adequate, efficient, just, and reasonable service, instrumentalities, equipment, and facilities, as are necessary to promote the safety, health, comfort, and convenience of its customers, its employees, and the public. This bill would require the commission, on or before January 1, 2028, to adopt standards for an electrical or gas corporation's use of artificial intelligence models, as provided. The bill would require the commission to direct an electrical or gas corporation to file a plan that demonstrates the corporation's compliance with those standards. The bill would authorize the commission to prohibit an electrical or gas corporation's use of an artificial intelligence model if the commission finds that deployment of the artificial intelligence model would negatively impact the provision of safe, affordable, and reliable electrical or gas service. The bill would require each community choice aggregator and local publicly owned electric utility to adopt a policy regarding its use of an artificial intelligence model that is consistent with the standards. Under existing law, a violation of an order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because a violation of a commission action implementing those requirements would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Additionally, by imposing new duties on local publicly owned electric utilities, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons.

Who sponsors CA SB 1011?

McNerney is the primary sponsor of CA SB 1011.

Description

Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission with regulatory jurisdiction over public utilities, including electrical corporations and gas corporations, while local publicly owned electric utilities are under the direction of their governing boards. Existing law requires every public utility to furnish and maintain adequate, efficient, just, and reasonable service, instrumentalities, equipment, and facilities, as are necessary to promote the safety, health, comfort, and convenience of its customers, its employees, and the public. This bill would require the commission, on or before January 1, 2028, to adopt standards for an electrical or gas corporation's use of artificial intelligence models, as provided. The bill would require the commission to direct an electrical or gas corporation to file a plan that demonstrates the corporation's compliance with those standards. The bill would authorize the commission to prohibit an electrical or gas corporation's use of an artificial intelligence model if the commission finds that deployment of the artificial intelligence model would negatively impact the provision of safe, affordable, and reliable electrical or gas service. The bill would require each community choice aggregator and local publicly owned electric utility to adopt a policy regarding its use of an artificial intelligence model that is consistent with the standards. Under existing law, a violation of an order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because a violation of a commission action implementing those requirements would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Additionally, by imposing new duties on local publicly owned electric utilities, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons.

Introduced
2026-02-10
Latest action
2026-05-28 — Ordered to inactive file on request of Senator McNerney.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • McNerneyauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-05-28

    Ordered to inactive file on request of Senator McNerney.

  2. 2026-05-19

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  3. 2026-05-18

    From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 4261.) (May 14).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  4. 2026-05-18

    Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  5. 2026-05-08

    Set for hearing May 14.

  6. 2026-05-04

    May 4 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  7. 2026-04-24

    Set for hearing May 4.

  8. 2026-04-22

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  9. 2026-04-21

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2. Page 3957.) (April 20).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  10. 2026-04-14

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on P., D.T., & C.P. (Ayes 13. Noes 3. Page 3842.) (April 13). Re-referred to Com. on P., D.T., & C.P.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  11. 2026-04-10

    Set for hearing April 20 in P., D.T., & C.P. pending receipt.

  12. 2026-04-02

    Set for hearing April 13.

  13. 2026-02-18

    Referred to Coms. on E., U & C. and P., D.T., & C.P.

    referral-committee

  14. 2026-02-11

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 13.

  15. 2026-02-10

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

Versions

  • 02/10/26 - Introduced — 2026-02-10Compare
  • 04/22/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-04-22Compare
  • 05/18/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-05-18Compare
  • SB1011Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Privacy, Digital Technologies, and Consumer Protection]

    2026-04-13 · pass · 13-3

    Member-level votes (17)
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: no
    • Strickland: no
    • Grove: no
    • Dahle: other
  • Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-04-20 · pass · 7-2

    Member-level votes (9)
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Jones: no
    • Seyarto: no
  • Placed on suspense file

    2026-05-04 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Dahle: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Grayson: yes
  • Do pass as amended

    2026-05-14 · pass · 5-2

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Wahab: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Dahle: no
    • Seyarto: no

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 1011. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.