Bill Commons

CA SB 1007

in committee

Common interest developments: annual reports: assessments: discipline.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA SB 1007 pass?

Not yet. CA SB 1007 is in committee and has not come to a final vote. Latest recorded action (2026-06-24): June 24 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

What is CA SB 1007 about?

Existing law, the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act, governs the formation and operation of common interest developments. Existing law requires that a common interest development be managed by an association. Existing law requires an association of a common interest development to levy regular and special assessments to perform its obligations under the governing documents and the act, as provided. Existing law requires an association to prepare an annual budget report and a policy statement, as specified. Existing law requires the association to either deliver to all members the full report or a summary of the report that includes specified information, on the first page, whenever the annual budget report or a policy statement is prepared, as provided. This bill would require the annual budget report to include a comparison breakdown of the anticipated expenses of the previous fiscal year versus actual expenditures of the previous fiscal year and a statement regarding compensation of a management company, as provided. The bill would require a summary of an annual budget to also include the comparison breakdown and the statement regarding compensation of a management company, as specified. Existing law prohibits increases in regular assessments for any fiscal year, unless the board complies with certain requirements, including certain information in its annual budget report. Existing law prohibits an association from increasing regular assessments by more than 20 percent, without the approval of a majority of a quorum of members. This bill would prohibit an association from increasing a regular assessment, unless the board includes the above-referenced information pertaining to regular assessments. The bill would, instead, prohibit a board from increasing regular assessments by more than 8%, without the approval of the majority of a quorum of members. Existing law requires the association to notify a member 10 days before a meeting to consider or impose discipline on a member, or a monetary charge, as a means of reimbursing the association for costs incurred by the association in the repair of damage to the common area and facilities caused by a member, as provided. Existing law requires the notification to include, among other information, the nature of the alleged violation, or nature of the damage to the common area and facilities. This bill would require the association to make any physical evidence used to determine a violation of the governing documents has occurred available to the member at least 5 business days before the hearing or deadline for the member's response, if the association seeks to impose a monetary penalty against a member for violation of the governing documents, as provided.

Who sponsors CA SB 1007?

Menjivar is the primary sponsor of CA SB 1007, joined by 2 cosponsors.

Description

Existing law, the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act, governs the formation and operation of common interest developments. Existing law requires that a common interest development be managed by an association. Existing law requires an association of a common interest development to levy regular and special assessments to perform its obligations under the governing documents and the act, as provided. Existing law requires an association to prepare an annual budget report and a policy statement, as specified. Existing law requires the association to either deliver to all members the full report or a summary of the report that includes specified information, on the first page, whenever the annual budget report or a policy statement is prepared, as provided. This bill would require the annual budget report to include a comparison breakdown of the anticipated expenses of the previous fiscal year versus actual expenditures of the previous fiscal year and a statement regarding compensation of a management company, as provided. The bill would require a summary of an annual budget to also include the comparison breakdown and the statement regarding compensation of a management company, as specified. Existing law prohibits increases in regular assessments for any fiscal year, unless the board complies with certain requirements, including certain information in its annual budget report. Existing law prohibits an association from increasing regular assessments by more than 20 percent, without the approval of a majority of a quorum of members. This bill would prohibit an association from increasing a regular assessment, unless the board includes the above-referenced information pertaining to regular assessments. The bill would, instead, prohibit a board from increasing regular assessments by more than 8%, without the approval of the majority of a quorum of members. Existing law requires the association to notify a member 10 days before a meeting to consider or impose discipline on a member, or a monetary charge, as a means of reimbursing the association for costs incurred by the association in the repair of damage to the common area and facilities caused by a member, as provided. Existing law requires the notification to include, among other information, the nature of the alleged violation, or nature of the damage to the common area and facilities. This bill would require the association to make any physical evidence used to determine a violation of the governing documents has occurred available to the member at least 5 business days before the hearing or deadline for the member's response, if the association seeks to impose a monetary penalty against a member for violation of the governing documents, as provided.

Introduced
2026-02-09
Latest action
2026-06-24 — June 24 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Menjivarauthor
  • Gonzalezcoauthor
  • Graysoncoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-06-24

    June 24 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

  2. 2026-06-15

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  3. 2026-06-04

    Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D., JUD., and APPR.

    referral-committee

  4. 2026-05-27

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

    reading-1

  5. 2026-05-27

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 13. Page 4482.) Ordered to the Assembly.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  6. 2026-05-22

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  7. 2026-05-21

    Read third time and amended.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-3

  8. 2026-05-21

    Ordered to second reading.

    reading-1,reading-2

  9. 2026-04-30

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  10. 2026-04-29

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 1. Page 4085.) (April 28).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  11. 2026-04-10

    Set for hearing April 28.

  12. 2026-03-18

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 8. Noes 2. Page 3589.) (March 17). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  13. 2026-03-03

    Set for hearing March 17.

  14. 2026-02-18

    Referred to Coms. on HOUSING and JUD.

    referral-committee

  15. 2026-02-10

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 12.

  16. 2026-02-09

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

Versions

  • 02/09/26 - Introduced — 2026-02-09Compare
  • 05/21/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-05-21Compare
  • 06/15/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-06-15Compare
  • SB1007Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary]

    2026-03-17 · pass · 8-2

    Member-level votes (10)
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Seyarto: no
    • Ochoa Bogh: no
  • Do pass

    2026-04-28 · pass · 9-1

    Member-level votes (13)
    • Laird: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Alvarado-Gil: no
    • Niello: other
    • Wiener: other
    • Stern: other
  • 3rd Reading SB1007 Menjivar et al.

    2026-05-27 · pass · 24-13

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Grayson: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Grove: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: no
    • Niello: no
    • Valladares: no
    • Ashby: no
    • Cabaldon: no
    • Strickland: no
    • Wiener: no
    • Alvarado-Gil: no
    • Becker: no
    • Seyarto: no
    • Jones: no
    • Stern: no
    • Blakespear: no
    • Allen: other
    • Choi: other
    • Dahle: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 1007. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.