Bill Commons

CA SB 1000

enacted

California AI Transparency Act.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA SB 1000 pass?

Yes. CA SB 1000 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-09-30): Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 861, Statutes of 2026.

What is CA SB 1000 about?

Existing law, the California AI Transparency Act (CATA) , beginning August 2, 2026, generally regulates provenance data disclosure in content generated by artificial intelligence (AI) , including by requiring a covered provider to make available an AI detection tool at no cost to the user that meets certain criteria. Existing law requires a covered provider to offer the user the option to include a certain manifest disclosure in image, video, or audio content, or content that is any combination thereof, created or altered by the covered provider's generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) system and requires a covered provider to include a certain latent disclosure in AI-generated image, video, or audio content, or content that is any combination thereof, created by the covered provider's GenAI system. Existing law defines "covered provider" for these purposes to mean a person that creates, codes, or otherwise produces a generative AI system that has over 1,000,000 monthly visitors or users and is publicly accessible within the geographic boundaries of the state. This bill would recast those provisions to, among other changes, delete the user threshold from the definition of "covered provider," replace the term "AI detection tool" with "disclosure verification tool," delete the above-described requirement of a covered provider to offer the user the option to include a manifest disclosure in content, and additionally require a covered provider to include in the above-described latent disclosure whether the GenAI system created or altered the content. The bill would delay CATA's operation with respect to a GenAI system that is designed to primarily function as assistive technology, as defined, would prohibit a covered provider from falsely representing that a GenAI system is designed to primarily function as assistive technology, and would punish a covered provider who makes such a false representation with a certain civil action, as specified. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Who sponsors CA SB 1000?

Becker is the primary sponsor of CA SB 1000.

Description

Existing law, the California AI Transparency Act (CATA) , beginning August 2, 2026, generally regulates provenance data disclosure in content generated by artificial intelligence (AI) , including by requiring a covered provider to make available an AI detection tool at no cost to the user that meets certain criteria. Existing law requires a covered provider to offer the user the option to include a certain manifest disclosure in image, video, or audio content, or content that is any combination thereof, created or altered by the covered provider's generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) system and requires a covered provider to include a certain latent disclosure in AI-generated image, video, or audio content, or content that is any combination thereof, created by the covered provider's GenAI system. Existing law defines "covered provider" for these purposes to mean a person that creates, codes, or otherwise produces a generative AI system that has over 1,000,000 monthly visitors or users and is publicly accessible within the geographic boundaries of the state. This bill would recast those provisions to, among other changes, delete the user threshold from the definition of "covered provider," replace the term "AI detection tool" with "disclosure verification tool," delete the above-described requirement of a covered provider to offer the user the option to include a manifest disclosure in content, and additionally require a covered provider to include in the above-described latent disclosure whether the GenAI system created or altered the content. The bill would delay CATA's operation with respect to a GenAI system that is designed to primarily function as assistive technology, as defined, would prohibit a covered provider from falsely representing that a GenAI system is designed to primarily function as assistive technology, and would punish a covered provider who makes such a false representation with a certain civil action, as specified. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Introduced
2026-02-09
Latest action
2026-09-30 — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 861, Statutes of 2026.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Beckerauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-09-30

    Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 861, Statutes of 2026.

    became-law

  2. 2026-09-30

    Approved by the Governor.

    executive-signature

  3. 2026-09-02

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

    executive-receipt

  4. 2026-08-27

    Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. 2026-08-25

    Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.

    amendment-passage,passage,reading-1,reading-3

  6. 2026-08-25

    In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  7. 2026-08-25

    Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 72. Noes 0. Page 6517.) Ordered to the Senate.

    amendment-passage,passage,reading-1,reading-3

  8. 2026-08-21

    Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-3

  9. 2026-08-21

    Assembly Rule 69(b)(1) suspended.

  10. 2026-08-21

    Read third time and amended.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-3

  11. 2026-08-21

    Assembly Rule 69(b)(1) suspended. (Ayes 55. Noes 17. Page 6296.)

  12. 2026-07-02

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  13. 2026-07-01

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (July 1).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  14. 2026-06-17

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (June 16). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  15. 2026-06-09

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  16. 2026-05-26

    Referred to Com. on P. & C.P.

    referral-committee

  17. 2026-05-20

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

    reading-1

  18. 2026-05-19

    Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 33. Noes 1. Page 4345.) Ordered to the Assembly.

    amendment-passage,passage,reading-1,reading-3

  19. 2026-05-14

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 4260.) (May 14).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  20. 2026-05-14

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  21. 2026-05-08

    Set for hearing May 14.

  22. 2026-04-27

    April 27 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  23. 2026-04-17

    Set for hearing April 27.

  24. 2026-04-14

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1. Page 3843.) (April 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  25. 2026-04-13

    Set for hearing April 13.

  26. 2026-03-26

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on P., D.T., & C.P.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  27. 2026-02-18

    Referred to Com. on P., D.T., & C.P.

    referral-committee

  28. 2026-02-10

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 12.

  29. 2026-02-09

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

Versions

  • 02/09/26 - Introduced — 2026-02-09Compare
  • 03/26/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-03-26Compare
  • 06/09/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-06-09Compare
  • 08/21/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-08-21Compare
  • 08/30/26 - Enrolled — 2026-08-30Compare
  • 09/30/26 - Chaptered — 2026-09-30Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare
  • SB1000Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-04-13 · pass · 8-1

    Member-level votes (9)
    • Umberg: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Jones: no
  • Placed on suspense file

    2026-04-27 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Wahab: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Richardson: yes
  • Do pass

    2026-05-14 · pass · 5-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Wahab: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Dahle: other
    • Seyarto: other
  • 3rd Reading (Urgency Clause)

    2026-05-19 · pass · 33-1

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Grove: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Choi: no
    • Strickland: other
    • Alvarado-Gil: other
    • Dahle: other
    • Jones: other
    • Seyarto: other
    • Niello: other
  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-06-16 · pass · 15-0

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Irwin: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • DeMaio: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Hoover: yes
  • Do pass.

    2026-07-01 · pass · 10-0

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Mark González: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: other
    • Tangipa: other
    • Pellerin: other
    • Calderon: other
    • Ta: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-10-01T16:19:33.726812Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 1000. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.