Bill Commons

CA ACR 219

enacted

Relative to California OB-GYN Week.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA ACR 219 pass?

Yes. CA ACR 219 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-08-12): Chaptered by Secretary of State - Res. Chapter 173, Statutes of 2026.

What is CA ACR 219 about?

This measure would designate the week of May 24, 2026, to May 30, 2026, inclusive, as California OB-GYN Week to recognize the essential contributions of obstetricians and gynecologists (OB-GYNs) to the health care system and the critical role they play in delivering comprehensive, preventive, and primary care services, and to encourage the continued recognition and support of OB-GYNs to ensure access to high-quality, equitable health care for all Californians.

Who sponsors CA ACR 219?

Papan is the primary sponsor of CA ACR 219, joined by 12 cosponsors.

Description

This measure would designate the week of May 24, 2026, to May 30, 2026, inclusive, as California OB-GYN Week to recognize the essential contributions of obstetricians and gynecologists (OB-GYNs) to the health care system and the critical role they play in delivering comprehensive, preventive, and primary care services, and to encourage the continued recognition and support of OB-GYNs to ensure access to high-quality, equitable health care for all Californians.

Introduced
2026-06-03
Latest action
2026-08-12 — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Res. Chapter 173, Statutes of 2026.
Bill type
concurrent resolution
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Papanauthor
  • Aguiar-Currycoauthor
  • Boernercoauthor
  • Elhawarycoauthor
  • Irwincoauthor
  • Patelcoauthor
  • Quirk-Silvacoauthor
  • Michelle Rodriguezcoauthor
  • Blanca Rubiocoauthor
  • Schiavocoauthor
  • Sharp-Collinscoauthor
  • Stefanicoauthor
  • Wickscoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-08-12

    Chaptered by Secretary of State - Res. Chapter 173, Statutes of 2026.

  2. 2026-08-12

    Enrolled and filed with the Secretary of State at 3 p.m.

  3. 2026-08-06

    Adopted and to Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 0.)

    amendment-passage,passage

  4. 2026-08-06

    In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.

    committee-passage

  5. 2026-08-06

    Adopted and to Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 5297.)

    amendment-passage,passage

  6. 2026-08-04

    Ordered to special consent calendar.

  7. 2026-06-24

    From committee: Ordered to third reading.

    committee-passage,reading-1,reading-3

  8. 2026-06-18

    In Senate. To Com. on RLS.

    referral-committee

  9. 2026-06-18

    Adopted and to Senate. (Ayes 63. Noes 0. Page 5761.)

    amendment-passage,passage

  10. 2026-06-15

    From committee: Be adopted. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 15).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,passage

  11. 2026-06-15

    Coauthors revised.

  12. 2026-06-08

    Referred to Com. on RLS.

    referral-committee

  13. 2026-06-04

    From printer.

  14. 2026-06-03

    Introduced. To print.

    introduction

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Be adopted. To Consent Calendar.

    2026-06-15 · pass · 10-0

    Member-level votes (10)
    • Ta: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Mark González: yes

  • ACR 219 Papan Consent Calendar Second Day

    2026-06-18 · pass · 63-0

    Member-level votes (79)
    • Fong: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Castillo: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • DeMaio: yes
    • Alvarez: other
    • Ellis: other
    • Haney: other
    • Johnson: other
    • Muratsuchi: other
    • Flora: other
    • Papan: other
    • Dixon: other
    • Patel: other
    • Tangipa: other
    • McKinnor: other
    • Bains: other
    • Soria: other
    • Celeste Rodriguez: other
    • Wicks: other
    • Ramos: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260ACR219

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-09-25T23:50:26.468580Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changesStatus and relationship changes

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Bulk imports for this sessionSession dates and activity

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=ACR 219. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.