Bill Commons

CA ACA 22

enacted

A resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the State, by adding Section 4.5 to Article XIII A thereof, relating to taxation.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA ACA 22 pass?

Yes. CA ACA 22 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-06-25): Chaptered by Secretary of State - Res. Chapter 132, Statutes of 2026.

What is CA ACA 22 about?

The California Constitution conditions the imposition of a special tax by a local government upon the approval of 23 of the voters of the local government voting on that tax, and prohibits these entities from imposing an ad valorem tax on real property or a transactions or sales tax on the sale of real property. The Supreme Court of California interpreted this provision and other provisions restricting the authority of local governments to impose, extend, or increase taxes as not restricting the authority of voters to impose taxes via initiative. This measure would, beginning January 1, 2027, prohibit a local government, including the electorate of a local government exercising the initiative power, from imposing, extending, or increasing any special tax, except as provided, unless and until that tax is submitted to the electorate and approved by a 23 vote. The measure would prohibit a local government, including the electorate of a local government exercising the initiative power, from imposing ad valorem taxes on real property, except as provided pursuant to specified constitutional provisions.

Who sponsors CA ACA 22?

Wicks is the primary sponsor of CA ACA 22.

Description

The California Constitution conditions the imposition of a special tax by a local government upon the approval of 23 of the voters of the local government voting on that tax, and prohibits these entities from imposing an ad valorem tax on real property or a transactions or sales tax on the sale of real property. The Supreme Court of California interpreted this provision and other provisions restricting the authority of local governments to impose, extend, or increase taxes as not restricting the authority of voters to impose taxes via initiative. This measure would, beginning January 1, 2027, prohibit a local government, including the electorate of a local government exercising the initiative power, from imposing, extending, or increasing any special tax, except as provided, unless and until that tax is submitted to the electorate and approved by a 23 vote. The measure would prohibit a local government, including the electorate of a local government exercising the initiative power, from imposing ad valorem taxes on real property, except as provided pursuant to specified constitutional provisions.

Introduced
2026-06-25
Latest action
2026-06-25 — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Res. Chapter 132, Statutes of 2026.
Bill type
constitutional amendment
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Wicksauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-06-25

    Introduced. To print.

    introduction

  2. 2026-06-25

    From printer.

  3. 2026-06-25

    Without reference to committee.

    referral-committee

  4. 2026-06-25

    Adopted and to Senate. (Ayes 68. Noes 2. Page 5867.)

    amendment-passage,passage

  5. 2026-06-25

    Assembly Rule 46 suspended. (Page 5867.)

  6. 2026-06-25

    Assembly Rule 66 suspended. (Page 5867.)

  7. 2026-06-25

    Assembly Rule 63 suspended.

  8. 2026-06-25

    Unanimous consent granted to take up without reference to file.

  9. 2026-06-25

    Joint rules and Senate rules suspended.

  10. 2026-06-25

    Withdrawn from committee.

    withdrawal

  11. 2026-06-25

    In Senate. To Com. on RLS.

    referral-committee

  12. 2026-06-25

    (Ayes 36. Noes 0.)

  13. 2026-06-25

    (Ayes 36. Noes 0.)

  14. 2026-06-25

    Adopted and to Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 1. Page 5018.)

  15. 2026-06-25

    In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.

    committee-passage

  16. 2026-06-25

    Enrolled and filed with the Secretary of State at 4:40 p.m.

    executive-receipt

  17. 2026-06-25

    Chaptered by Secretary of State - Res. Chapter 132, Statutes of 2026.

    became-law

  18. 2026-06-25

    Adopted and to Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 1.)

    amendment-passage,passage

  19. 2026-06-25

    (Ayes 35. Noes 1. Page 5018.)

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • W/O REF. TO FILE ACA22 Wicks By Gonzalez

    2026-06-25 · pass · 35-1

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Grove: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Niello: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Strickland: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Wiener: no
    • Dahle: other
    • Reyes: other
    • Jones: other
    • Alvarado-Gil: other
  • ACA 22 WICKS Assembly Third Reading

    2026-06-25 · pass · 68-2

    Member-level votes (79)
    • Rivas: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Ellis: yes
    • Flora: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Castillo: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • DeMaio: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Schultz: no
    • Lee: no
    • Quirk-Silva: other
    • Kalra: other
    • Haney: other
    • Celeste Rodriguez: other
    • Ahrens: other
    • Soria: other
    • Johnson: other
    • Bonta: other
    • Lackey: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-10-18T04:13:29.356567Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=ACA 22. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.