Bill Commons

CA AB 955

dead

Mexican prepaid health plans.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Quick answers

Did CA AB 955 pass?

No. CA AB 955 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2026-02-02). Latest recorded action (2026-02-02): From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

What is CA AB 955 about?

Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law requires a prepaid health plan to apply for licensure as a health care service plan if the prepaid health plan operating lawfully under the laws of Mexico elects to operate a health care service plan in this state. Existing law requires the application for licensure to demonstrate compliance with specified requirements, including that the prepaid health plan offers and sells in this state only employer-sponsored group plan contracts exclusively for the benefit of Mexican nationals legally employed in the County of San Diego or the County of Imperial, and their dependents, that pay for the delivery of health care services that are provided wholly in Mexico, except as specified. Existing law also requires the application for licensure to demonstrate that the prepaid health plan maintains a tangible net equity of at least $1,000,000 or to demonstrate a reasonable acceptable alternative reimbursement arrangement that the Director of the Department of Managed Health Care is authorized, in the director's discretion, to accept. This bill would modify the above-described requirement that a prepaid health plan offers and sells in this state only employer-sponsored group plan contracts exclusively for the benefit of specified Mexican nationals to additionally include employer-sponsored group plan contracts for the benefit of individuals legally employed in the County of San Diego or the County of Imperial, and for the benefit of their dependents regardless of nationality. The bill would authorize a prepaid health plan operating lawfully under the laws of Mexico that is licensed to operate a health care service plan to offer and sell that employer-sponsored group plan contract only to an employer that provides alternative health care coverage through either a specified full-service health care service plan or a health insurance policy. The bill would modify the above-described requirement that a prepaid health plan maintains a tangible net equity of at least $1,000,000 to instead require a prepaid health plan to maintain a tangible net equity of at least $2,300,000 or to demonstrate an alternative reimbursement arrangement subject to the director's discretion, as described above. Because a willful violation of these provisions by a prepaid health plan, as described above, would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Who sponsors CA AB 955?

Alvarez is the primary sponsor of CA AB 955.

Description

Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law requires a prepaid health plan to apply for licensure as a health care service plan if the prepaid health plan operating lawfully under the laws of Mexico elects to operate a health care service plan in this state. Existing law requires the application for licensure to demonstrate compliance with specified requirements, including that the prepaid health plan offers and sells in this state only employer-sponsored group plan contracts exclusively for the benefit of Mexican nationals legally employed in the County of San Diego or the County of Imperial, and their dependents, that pay for the delivery of health care services that are provided wholly in Mexico, except as specified. Existing law also requires the application for licensure to demonstrate that the prepaid health plan maintains a tangible net equity of at least $1,000,000 or to demonstrate a reasonable acceptable alternative reimbursement arrangement that the Director of the Department of Managed Health Care is authorized, in the director's discretion, to accept. This bill would modify the above-described requirement that a prepaid health plan offers and sells in this state only employer-sponsored group plan contracts exclusively for the benefit of specified Mexican nationals to additionally include employer-sponsored group plan contracts for the benefit of individuals legally employed in the County of San Diego or the County of Imperial, and for the benefit of their dependents regardless of nationality. The bill would authorize a prepaid health plan operating lawfully under the laws of Mexico that is licensed to operate a health care service plan to offer and sell that employer-sponsored group plan contract only to an employer that provides alternative health care coverage through either a specified full-service health care service plan or a health insurance policy. The bill would modify the above-described requirement that a prepaid health plan maintains a tangible net equity of at least $1,000,000 to instead require a prepaid health plan to maintain a tangible net equity of at least $2,300,000 or to demonstrate an alternative reimbursement arrangement subject to the director's discretion, as described above. Because a willful violation of these provisions by a prepaid health plan, as described above, would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Introduced
2025-04-10
Latest action
2026-02-02 — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Alvarezauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2025-02-20

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

  2. 2025-02-21

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  3. 2025-03-10

    Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

    referral-committee

  4. 2025-04-10

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  5. 2025-04-21

    Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

    referral-committee

  6. 2025-04-24

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 22).

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee

  7. 2025-04-28

    Read second time and amended.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  8. 2025-04-29

    Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    referral-committee

  9. 2025-05-14

    In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  10. 2025-05-21

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

    referral-committee

  11. 2025-05-21

    Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 1627.)

  12. 2025-05-23

    In committee: Held under submission.

  13. 2026-01-31

    Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

    failure

  14. 2026-02-02

    From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

    committee-passage,failure

Versions

  • 02/20/25 - Introduced — 2025-02-20Compare
  • 04/10/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-04-10Compare
  • 04/28/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-04-28Compare
  • AB955Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-04-22 · pass · 16-0

    Member-level votes (16)
    • Chen: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Flora: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Addis: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 955. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.