CA AB 939
enactedHousing development: density bonuses: affordability of for-sale units.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CA AB 939 pass?
Yes. CA AB 939 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-09-29): Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 790, Statutes of 2026.
What is CA AB 939 about?
Existing law, commonly referred to as the Density Bonus Law, requires a city or county to provide a developer that proposes a housing development, as defined, within the city or county with a density bonus, other incentives or concessions, and waivers or reductions of development standards, as specified, if the developer agrees to construct specified units and meets other requirements. Existing law, among other things, requires compliance with certain affordability requirements, including requiring that the applicant agree to ensure, and that the city, county, or city and county ensure, that a for-sale unit that qualified the applicant for the award of the density bonus is either (1) initially sold to and occupied by a person or family of very low, low, or moderate income, as specified, or (2) if the unit is not purchased by an income-qualified person or family within 180 days after the issuance of the certificate of occupancy, the unit is purchased by a qualified nonprofit housing corporation, as provided. This bill would additionally allow the applicant and the city, county, or city and county to comply with the above-described affordability requirements with respect to a for-sale unit by ensuring that the unit is purchased by a nonprofit housing corporation, as specified, for properties to be sold to and occupied by extremely low, very low, or lower income families who participate in a below market interest rate loan program, as described. By adding to the duties of local agencies to implement the Density Bonus Law, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors CA AB 939?
Schultz is the primary sponsor of CA AB 939, joined by 2 cosponsors.
Description
Existing law, commonly referred to as the Density Bonus Law, requires a city or county to provide a developer that proposes a housing development, as defined, within the city or county with a density bonus, other incentives or concessions, and waivers or reductions of development standards, as specified, if the developer agrees to construct specified units and meets other requirements. Existing law, among other things, requires compliance with certain affordability requirements, including requiring that the applicant agree to ensure, and that the city, county, or city and county ensure, that a for-sale unit that qualified the applicant for the award of the density bonus is either (1) initially sold to and occupied by a person or family of very low, low, or moderate income, as specified, or (2) if the unit is not purchased by an income-qualified person or family within 180 days after the issuance of the certificate of occupancy, the unit is purchased by a qualified nonprofit housing corporation, as provided. This bill would additionally allow the applicant and the city, county, or city and county to comply with the above-described affordability requirements with respect to a for-sale unit by ensuring that the unit is purchased by a nonprofit housing corporation, as specified, for properties to be sold to and occupied by extremely low, very low, or lower income families who participate in a below market interest rate loan program, as described. By adding to the duties of local agencies to implement the Density Bonus Law, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Introduced
- 2026-01-05
- Latest action
- 2026-09-29 — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 790, Statutes of 2026.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Schultzauthor
- Solachecoauthor
- Wickscoauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-09-29
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 790, Statutes of 2026.
became-law
2026-09-29
Approved by the Governor.
executive-signature
2026-09-04
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
executive-receipt
2026-08-27
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 67. Noes 6.).
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-08-27
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
2026-08-27
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 67. Noes 6. Page 6685.).
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-08-26
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 1.).
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-08-24
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-08-21
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-08-18
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-08-17
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-06-23
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-06-22
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2
2026-06-11
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2026-05-06
Referred to Com. on HOUSING.
referral-committee
2026-01-29
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
reading-1,referral-committee
2026-01-29
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 60. Noes 9. Page 3873.)
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-01-22
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 2.) (January 22).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-01-22
Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Page 3806.)
2026-01-22
Coauthors revised.
2026-01-22
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-01-16
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
referral-committee
2026-01-15
Read second time and amended.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2
2026-01-14
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 1.) (January 14).
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee
2026-01-05
Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
referral-committee
2026-01-05
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-01-05
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
referral-committee
2025-03-10
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
referral-committee
2025-02-20
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
2025-02-19
Read first time. To print.
reading-1
Versions
- 02/19/25 - Introduced — 2025-02-19Compare
- 01/05/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-01-05Compare
- 01/15/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-01-15Compare
- 08/17/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-08-17Compare
- 08/21/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-08-21Compare
- 09/01/26 - Enrolled — 2026-09-01Compare
- 09/29/26 - Chaptered — 2026-09-29Compare
- (document, no version)Compare
- AB939Compare
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
Votes
Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
2026-01-14 · pass · 10-1
Member-level votes (12)
- Wicks: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Quirk-Silva: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Haney: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Lee: yes
- Ta: yes
- Tangipa: no
- Wilson: other
Do pass.
2026-01-22 · pass · 13-2
Member-level votes (15)
- Wicks: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Krell: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Solache: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Fong: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Ta: yes
- Dixon: yes
- Hoover: no
- Tangipa: no
AB 939 Schultz Assembly Third Reading
2026-01-29 · pass · 60-9
Member-level votes (80)
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Chen: yes
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Alvarez: yes
- Bains: yes
- Haney: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Berman: yes
- Ta: yes
- Solache: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Papan: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Boerner: yes
- Bennett: yes
- Flora: yes
- Fong: yes
- Rivas: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Petrie-Norris: yes
- Patel: yes
- Irwin: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Bonta: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- Soria: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Wallis: yes
- Gabriel: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- Castillo: yes
- Krell: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Davies: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Addis: yes
- Ward: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Dixon: yes
- Quirk-Silva: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Lee: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Alanis: yes
- Hart: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- DeMaio: no
- Gallagher: no
- Ramos: no
- Macedo: no
- Tangipa: no
- Hoover: no
- Ávila Farías: no
- Sanchez: no
- Ellis: no
- Arambula: other
- Lackey: other
- Celeste Rodriguez: other
- Ransom: other
- Hadwick: other
- Gipson: other
- Jeff Gonzalez: other
- Johnson: other
- Caloza: other
- Muratsuchi: other
- Valencia: other
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
2026-06-10 · pass · 8-0
Member-level votes (10)
- Pérez: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Cortese: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Padilla: yes
- Seyarto: other
- Ochoa Bogh: other
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-10-02T20:33:43.444095Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 939. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.