Bill Commons

CA AB 691

dead

Personal Income Tax Law: credits: pet adoption and medical expenses.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Quick answers

Did CA AB 691 pass?

No. CA AB 691 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2025-06-05). Latest recorded action (2025-06-05): From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

What is CA AB 691 about?

The Personal Income Tax Law allows various credits against the taxes imposed by that law. This bill, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2025, and before January 1, 2030, would allow a credit against the taxes imposed by that law for the qualified pet adoption costs, as defined, not to exceed $250, and the qualified pet medical expenses, as defined, not to exceed $500, paid or incurred during the taxable year. The bill would prohibit a claim for qualified pet adoption costs for more than one qualified pet, as defined, during the life of the taxpayer. The bill would additionally prohibit a claim for qualified pet medical expenses with regard to more than one qualified pet during the life of the taxpayer, as provided. In the case of spouses filing a joint return, the bill would apply these restrictions to each spouse separately. The bill would require a taxpayer to provide all information necessary to administer this credit, upon request and in the form and manner provided by the Franchise Tax Board, including, but not limited to, a declaration under penalty of perjury that the taxpayer has not previously claimed the credit. By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure to contain, among other things, specific goals that the tax expenditure will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements. This bill also would include additional information required for any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Who sponsors CA AB 691?

Wallis is the primary sponsor of CA AB 691.

Description

The Personal Income Tax Law allows various credits against the taxes imposed by that law. This bill, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2025, and before January 1, 2030, would allow a credit against the taxes imposed by that law for the qualified pet adoption costs, as defined, not to exceed $250, and the qualified pet medical expenses, as defined, not to exceed $500, paid or incurred during the taxable year. The bill would prohibit a claim for qualified pet adoption costs for more than one qualified pet, as defined, during the life of the taxpayer. The bill would additionally prohibit a claim for qualified pet medical expenses with regard to more than one qualified pet during the life of the taxpayer, as provided. In the case of spouses filing a joint return, the bill would apply these restrictions to each spouse separately. The bill would require a taxpayer to provide all information necessary to administer this credit, upon request and in the form and manner provided by the Franchise Tax Board, including, but not limited to, a declaration under penalty of perjury that the taxpayer has not previously claimed the credit. By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure to contain, among other things, specific goals that the tax expenditure will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements. This bill also would include additional information required for any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Introduced
2025-03-13
Latest action
2025-06-05 — From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Wallisauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2025-02-14

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

  2. 2025-02-15

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.

  3. 2025-03-13

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on REV. & TAX. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  4. 2025-03-13

    Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.

    referral-committee

  5. 2025-03-17

    Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.

    referral-committee

  6. 2025-04-07

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  7. 2025-04-21

    In committee: Set, second hearing. Referred to suspense file.

    referral-committee

  8. 2025-05-05

    In committee: Set, final hearing. Held under submission.

  9. 2025-06-05

    From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

    committee-passage,failure

Versions

Documents

Votes

Not provided by source.

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 691. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.