Bill Commons

CA AB 687

withdrawn

Health care coverage: colorectal cancer screening.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA AB 687 pass?

No. CA AB 687 was withdrawn and is no longer under consideration. Latest recorded action (2026-06-25): In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

What is CA AB 687 about?

Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law generally requires a health care service plan contract or a health insurance policy issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2022, to provide coverage without cost sharing for a colorectal cancer screening test assigned either a grade of A or a grade of B by the United States Preventive Services Task Force and for a required colonoscopy for a positive result on a test with those grades. This bill would additionally require that coverage if the screening test is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration and either meets requirements for coverage established by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, as specified, or is included in the most recently published guidelines from the American Cancer Society. Because a violation of the bill by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Who sponsors CA AB 687?

Patterson is the primary sponsor of CA AB 687.

Description

Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law generally requires a health care service plan contract or a health insurance policy issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2022, to provide coverage without cost sharing for a colorectal cancer screening test assigned either a grade of A or a grade of B by the United States Preventive Services Task Force and for a required colonoscopy for a positive result on a test with those grades. This bill would additionally require that coverage if the screening test is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration and either meets requirements for coverage established by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, as specified, or is included in the most recently published guidelines from the American Cancer Society. Because a violation of the bill by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Introduced
2025-04-08
Latest action
2026-06-25 — In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Pattersonauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-06-25

    In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  2. 2026-06-22

    Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

    referral-committee

  3. 2026-06-15

    Withdrawn from committee.

    withdrawal

  4. 2026-06-15

    Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

    referral-committee

  5. 2026-06-15

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  6. 2025-07-02

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  7. 2025-06-18

    Referred to Coms. on N.R. & W. and E.Q.

    referral-committee

  8. 2025-06-09

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

    reading-1,referral-committee

  9. 2025-06-05

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 56. Noes 3. Page 2112.)

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  10. 2025-05-27

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  11. 2025-05-23

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (May 23).

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage

  12. 2025-05-23

    Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  13. 2025-05-23

    Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 51. Noes 16. Page 1644.)

  14. 2025-04-23

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.

    referral-committee

  15. 2025-04-10

    Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    referral-committee

  16. 2025-04-09

    Read second time and amended.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  17. 2025-04-08

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 2.) (April 7).

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee

  18. 2025-03-03

    Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.

    referral-committee

  19. 2025-02-15

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.

  20. 2025-02-14

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

Versions

  • 02/14/25 - Introduced — 2025-02-14Compare
  • 04/09/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-04-09Compare
  • 05/23/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-05-23Compare
  • 06/15/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-06-15Compare
  • AB687Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-04-07 · pass · 10-2

    Member-level votes (14)
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Ellis: yes
    • Flora: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Zbur: no
    • Kalra: no
    • Connolly: other
    • Muratsuchi: other
  • Do pass as amended.

    2025-05-23 · pass · 11-0

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Calderon: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Ta: other
    • Sanchez: other
    • Dixon: other
    • Tangipa: other
  • AB 687 Patterson Assembly Third Reading

    2025-06-05 · pass · 56-3

    Member-level votes (79)
    • Castillo: yes
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Flora: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • DeMaio: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Ellis: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Rogers: no
    • Lee: no
    • Zbur: no
    • Gallagher: other
    • Ortega: other
    • Gabriel: other
    • Kalra: other
    • Haney: other
    • Fong: other
    • Addis: other
    • Harabedian: other
    • Hart: other
    • Muratsuchi: other
    • Schiavo: other
    • Bauer-Kahan: other
    • Ramos: other
    • Celeste Rodriguez: other
    • Bennett: other
    • Caloza: other
    • Connolly: other
    • Bonta: other
    • Valencia: other
    • Jackson: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 687. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.