Bill Commons

CA AB 501

enacted

Lawsuits, liens, and other encumbrances.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA AB 501 pass?

Yes. CA AB 501 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-09-27): Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 505, Statutes of 2026.

What is CA AB 501 about?

Existing law prohibits a person from filing or recording, or directing another to file or record, a lawsuit, lien, or other encumbrance against any person or entity, knowing that it is false, with the intent to harass the person or entity or to influence or hinder the person in discharging their official duties if the person is a public officer or employee. Existing law also provides that a person who files a lawsuit, lien, or other encumbrance against any person or entity in violation of this prohibition is liable for a civil penalty not to exceed $5,000. This bill would instead provide that a person who files a lawsuit, lien, or other encumbrance against a person or entity in violation of the above-described prohibition is liable for a civil penalty not to exceed $15,000. The bill would also define "lien," for purposes of the above-described prohibition, to include a financing statement. The bill would prohibit a person from filing, or directing another to file, a financing statement for which no reasonable basis or legal cause exists. The bill would make related, conforming changes to these provisions. The Uniform Commercial Code-Secured Transactions governs security interests in collateral, including personal property and fixtures, as well as certain sales of accounts, contract rights, and chattel paper. That code, among other things, specifies requirements and procedures regarding perfecting a security interest, including the filing of a financing statement with the Secretary of State or the county recorder, based on the property type. Existing law specifies that a financing statement is sufficient if it provides, among other things, the name of the debtor. If it is established that a secured party is not proceeding in accordance with the code, existing law authorizes a court to restrain collection, enforcement, or disposition of collateral on appropriate terms and conditions. This bill would require the Secretary of State to notify the debtor named in the financing statement within 21 days after the financing statement is filed. The bill would additionally require any court fees incurred by a debtor to be paid at the end of the judicial proceeding, as specified. The bill would also make any party deemed to have violated above-described provision regarding lawsuits, liens, or other encumbrances liable to the debtor for three times all of the court fees paid. This bill would authorize a person identified as a debtor in a financing statement or a person who reasonably appears to be the person intended to be identified as a debtor in a financing statement that was not permitted to be filed, as prescribed, to file an affidavit, under penalty of perjury, attesting as such with the filing office in which the statement was filed. The bill would require the Secretary of State to make available a form affidavit for use. The bill would require the filing office, following acceptance of a properly signed affidavit, to hold the affidavit in abeyance for a 30-day period. The bill would require the filing office, upon expiration of that 30-day period, if no court order enjoining the filing has been received, to file a termination statement with respect to the financing statement identified in the affidavit, in accordance with certain legal procedures and timelines. The bill would authorize a secured party of record, identified in a financing statement for which an affidavit has been accepted, to petition the court to enjoin the filing office from filing the termination statement and for the court to determine whether the financing statement is valid and should be reinstated, as specified. The bill would authorize a court to award costs, reasonable attorney's fees, and, upon determining an affidavit was filed in bad faith, a $5,000 civil penalty. By expanding the crime of perjury and imposing new duties on county recorders, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Who sponsors CA AB 501?

Papan is the primary sponsor of CA AB 501.

Description

Existing law prohibits a person from filing or recording, or directing another to file or record, a lawsuit, lien, or other encumbrance against any person or entity, knowing that it is false, with the intent to harass the person or entity or to influence or hinder the person in discharging their official duties if the person is a public officer or employee. Existing law also provides that a person who files a lawsuit, lien, or other encumbrance against any person or entity in violation of this prohibition is liable for a civil penalty not to exceed $5,000. This bill would instead provide that a person who files a lawsuit, lien, or other encumbrance against a person or entity in violation of the above-described prohibition is liable for a civil penalty not to exceed $15,000. The bill would also define "lien," for purposes of the above-described prohibition, to include a financing statement. The bill would prohibit a person from filing, or directing another to file, a financing statement for which no reasonable basis or legal cause exists. The bill would make related, conforming changes to these provisions. The Uniform Commercial Code-Secured Transactions governs security interests in collateral, including personal property and fixtures, as well as certain sales of accounts, contract rights, and chattel paper. That code, among other things, specifies requirements and procedures regarding perfecting a security interest, including the filing of a financing statement with the Secretary of State or the county recorder, based on the property type. Existing law specifies that a financing statement is sufficient if it provides, among other things, the name of the debtor. If it is established that a secured party is not proceeding in accordance with the code, existing law authorizes a court to restrain collection, enforcement, or disposition of collateral on appropriate terms and conditions. This bill would require the Secretary of State to notify the debtor named in the financing statement within 21 days after the financing statement is filed. The bill would additionally require any court fees incurred by a debtor to be paid at the end of the judicial proceeding, as specified. The bill would also make any party deemed to have violated above-described provision regarding lawsuits, liens, or other encumbrances liable to the debtor for three times all of the court fees paid. This bill would authorize a person identified as a debtor in a financing statement or a person who reasonably appears to be the person intended to be identified as a debtor in a financing statement that was not permitted to be filed, as prescribed, to file an affidavit, under penalty of perjury, attesting as such with the filing office in which the statement was filed. The bill would require the Secretary of State to make available a form affidavit for use. The bill would require the filing office, following acceptance of a properly signed affidavit, to hold the affidavit in abeyance for a 30-day period. The bill would require the filing office, upon expiration of that 30-day period, if no court order enjoining the filing has been received, to file a termination statement with respect to the financing statement identified in the affidavit, in accordance with certain legal procedures and timelines. The bill would authorize a secured party of record, identified in a financing statement for which an affidavit has been accepted, to petition the court to enjoin the filing office from filing the termination statement and for the court to determine whether the financing statement is valid and should be reinstated, as specified. The bill would authorize a court to award costs, reasonable attorney's fees, and, upon determining an affidavit was filed in bad faith, a $5,000 civil penalty. By expanding the crime of perjury and imposing new duties on county recorders, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Introduced
2025-03-24
Latest action
2026-09-27 — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 505, Statutes of 2026.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Papanauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-09-27

    Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 505, Statutes of 2026.

    became-law

  2. 2026-09-27

    Approved by the Governor.

    executive-signature

  3. 2026-08-28

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.

    executive-receipt

  4. 2026-08-24

    Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0.).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  5. 2026-08-24

    Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6423.).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  6. 2026-08-20

    In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  7. 2026-08-20

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.).

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  8. 2026-08-20

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 5587.).

  9. 2026-08-18

    Ordered to special consent calendar.

  10. 2026-08-13

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  11. 2026-08-13

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 13).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  12. 2026-08-03

    In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.

    referral-committee

  13. 2026-07-01

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  14. 2026-06-15

    Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

    referral-committee

  15. 2026-06-10

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on RLS. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 9). Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  16. 2026-06-01

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  17. 2026-05-06

    Referred to Com. on JUD.

    referral-committee

  18. 2026-01-29

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

    reading-1,referral-committee

  19. 2026-01-29

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 3872.)

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  20. 2026-01-22

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (January 22).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  21. 2026-01-22

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  22. 2026-01-22

    Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Page 3806.)

  23. 2026-01-22

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.

    referral-committee

  24. 2026-01-15

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (January 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  25. 2026-01-13

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (January 12). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  26. 2026-01-08

    Assembly Rule 56 suspended. (Page 3717.)

  27. 2026-01-08

    (Pending re-refer to Com. on JUD.)

    referral-committee

  28. 2026-01-05

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  29. 2026-01-05

    Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    referral-committee

  30. 2026-01-05

    Re-referred to Coms. on B. & F. and JUD. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

    referral-committee

  31. 2025-05-13

    Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    referral-committee

  32. 2025-05-12

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  33. 2025-04-30

    In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  34. 2025-04-07

    Re-referred to Com. on JUD. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

    referral-committee

  35. 2025-04-07

    Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.

    referral-committee

  36. 2025-04-03

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & F. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  37. 2025-03-25

    Re-referred to Com. on B.&F.

    referral-committee

  38. 2025-03-24

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B.&F. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  39. 2025-03-24

    Referred to Coms. on B.&F. and JUD.

    referral-committee

  40. 2025-02-11

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.

  41. 2025-02-10

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

Versions

  • 02/10/25 - Introduced — 2025-02-10Compare
  • 03/24/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-03-24Compare
  • 04/03/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-04-03Compare
  • 05/12/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-05-12Compare
  • 01/05/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-01-05Compare
  • 06/01/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-06-01Compare
  • 08/26/26 - Enrolled — 2026-08-26Compare
  • 09/27/26 - Chaptered — 2026-09-27Compare
  • AB501Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar

    2026-01-12 · pass · 8-0

    Member-level votes (9)
    • Soria: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Chen: other

  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar

    2026-01-15 · pass · 12-0

    Member-level votes (12)
    • Johnson: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Stefani: yes

  • Do pass.

    2026-01-22 · pass · 15-0

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Hoover: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Dixon: yes

  • AB 501 Papan Assembly Third Reading

    2026-01-29 · pass · 75-0

    Member-level votes (80)
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Gallagher: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Flora: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • DeMaio: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Johnson: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Castillo: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Ellis: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Arambula: other
    • Celeste Rodriguez: other
    • Ransom: other
    • Gipson: other
    • Valencia: other

  • Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Rules] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

    2026-06-09 · pass · 12-0

    Member-level votes (13)
    • Wahab: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Niello: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Stern: other

  • Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

    2026-06-30 · pass · 6-0

    Member-level votes (6)
    • Cortese: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Seyarto: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB501

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-09-29T18:59:36.380540Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changesStatus and relationship changes

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Bulk imports for this sessionSession dates and activity

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 501. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.