Bill Commons

CA AB 417

enacted

Local finance: enhanced infrastructure financing districts: community revitalization and investment authorities.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Quick answers

Did CA AB 417 pass?

Yes. CA AB 417 has been enacted into law as of 2025-10-03. Latest recorded action (2025-10-03): Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 260, Statutes of 2025.

What is CA AB 417 about?

(1) Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a city or a county to designate a proposed enhanced infrastructure financing district to finance public capital facilities or other specified projects, including acquisition, construction, or repair of commercial structures by the small business occupant of such structures, if such acquisition, construction, or repair is for purposes of fostering economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, as specified, with a governing body referred to as the public financing authority, by adopting a resolution of intention to establish the proposed district. This bill would revise these provisions to instead authorize the designation of a proposed enhanced infrastructure financing district to finance capital facilities or other specified projects for the acquisition, construction, or repair of commercial structures by the small business occupant of such structures, as described above, if such acquisition, construction, or repair is for purposes of fostering economic recovery of a community, as specified. Existing law requires the public financing authority of an enhanced infrastructure financing district to hold a meeting and 3 public hearings on a proposed infrastructure financing plan, as provided. Existing law requires the public financing authority to review the enhanced infrastructure financing plan at least annually and to make any amendments, as specified. Existing law authorizes amendments to an approved infrastructure financing plan, as described, subject to approval by a majority vote of the governing board at a public hearing held following the provision of a 30 day mailed notice, as described. Existing law requires amendments that propose the increase of the limit of the total number of dollars in local taxes allocation to the plan to be adopted in accordance with all notices and hearing requirements for the affected landowners and residents within the proposed additional territory applicable to an initial proposed enhanced infrastructure financing plan. This bill would instead authorize the amendments, as specified, or the addition of a participating taxing entity and its representatives as members of a public financing authority after the date of district formation, to be approved by a majority vote of the public financing authority at a public hearing held following the provision of a 30-day mailed notice, as described above. The bill would instead require amendments that propose the increase of the limit of the total number of dollars in local taxes allocation to the plan, except where the increase is the result of an affected taxing entity agreeing to participate in the existing district and the plan is amended, as specified, to be adopted in accordance with all notices and hearing requirements, as described above. Existing law requires a public financing authority to adopt an annual report on or before June 30 of each year after holding a public hearing. This bill would instead require a public financing authority to adopt an annual report within 7 months of the close of each fiscal year after holding a public hearing. If, after the date of district formation, an affected taxing entity adopts a resolution approving the plan and to participate in the division of taxes used to finance an enhanced infrastructure financing district, existing law requires the division of taxes to be based upon the last equalized assessment roll that is used for the district, as specified. This bill would additionally authorize an affected taxing entity to, at any time after the date of district formation, approve the plan and participate in the division of taxes used to finance the activities of a district, by adopting a resolution of the governing body. (2) Existing law authorizes the creation of community revitalization and investment authorities, as specified, to carry out a community revitalization plan within a community revitalization and investment area. Existing law requires not less than 70% of the land calculated by census tracts, census block groups, as defined, or any combination of both within the area to be characterized by specified conditions, including the annual median household income that is less than, at the option of the authority, 80% of the statewide, countrywide, or citywide annual median income and three of four conditions, including deteriorated commercial or residential structures. This bill would instead require not less than 60% of the land calculated by census tracts, census block groups, as defined, or any combination of both within the area to be characterized by either of the two specified conditions, including the annual median household income that is less than, at the option of the authority, 80% of the statewide, countrywide, or citywide annual median income or three of four conditions, including deteriorated commercial or residential structures. The bill would make related technical, nonsubstantive changes. Existing law requires a community revitalization authority to consider adoption of a community revitalization plan at 3 public hearings, as specified. Existing law requires a community revitalization authority to post a notice of each meeting or public hearing, as specified, in an easily identifiable and accessible location on the authority's internet website and to mail a written notice of the meeting or public hearing to each owner of land and each resident at least 10 days prior to the meeting or public hearing. Existing law also requires notice of each public hearing to be published in a newspaper of general circulation, as specified. This bill would instead require a community revitalization authority to consider adoption of a community revitalization plan at 2 public hearings, as specified, and would make conforming changes. As an alternative to mailing separate mailed notices prior to the meeting or public hearing, the bill would authorize the authority to mail a notice to each landowner, resident, and affected taxing entity at least 40 days before the meeting, as specified. The bill would require the designated contact person, as described, to assemble and maintain an email contact list of all landowners, residents, and other interested parties who have expressed interest in receiving information and materials. Except for the newspaper notices, as described above, the bill would require a notice required by the above-described provisions to be provided in English and in all other languages spoken jointly by 20% or more of the population in the jurisdiction of the county of the proposed authority that speaks English less than "very well" and jointly speaks a language other than English, as specified.

Who sponsors CA AB 417?

Carrillo is the primary sponsor of CA AB 417.

Description

(1) Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a city or a county to designate a proposed enhanced infrastructure financing district to finance public capital facilities or other specified projects, including acquisition, construction, or repair of commercial structures by the small business occupant of such structures, if such acquisition, construction, or repair is for purposes of fostering economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, as specified, with a governing body referred to as the public financing authority, by adopting a resolution of intention to establish the proposed district. This bill would revise these provisions to instead authorize the designation of a proposed enhanced infrastructure financing district to finance capital facilities or other specified projects for the acquisition, construction, or repair of commercial structures by the small business occupant of such structures, as described above, if such acquisition, construction, or repair is for purposes of fostering economic recovery of a community, as specified. Existing law requires the public financing authority of an enhanced infrastructure financing district to hold a meeting and 3 public hearings on a proposed infrastructure financing plan, as provided. Existing law requires the public financing authority to review the enhanced infrastructure financing plan at least annually and to make any amendments, as specified. Existing law authorizes amendments to an approved infrastructure financing plan, as described, subject to approval by a majority vote of the governing board at a public hearing held following the provision of a 30 day mailed notice, as described. Existing law requires amendments that propose the increase of the limit of the total number of dollars in local taxes allocation to the plan to be adopted in accordance with all notices and hearing requirements for the affected landowners and residents within the proposed additional territory applicable to an initial proposed enhanced infrastructure financing plan. This bill would instead authorize the amendments, as specified, or the addition of a participating taxing entity and its representatives as members of a public financing authority after the date of district formation, to be approved by a majority vote of the public financing authority at a public hearing held following the provision of a 30-day mailed notice, as described above. The bill would instead require amendments that propose the increase of the limit of the total number of dollars in local taxes allocation to the plan, except where the increase is the result of an affected taxing entity agreeing to participate in the existing district and the plan is amended, as specified, to be adopted in accordance with all notices and hearing requirements, as described above. Existing law requires a public financing authority to adopt an annual report on or before June 30 of each year after holding a public hearing. This bill would instead require a public financing authority to adopt an annual report within 7 months of the close of each fiscal year after holding a public hearing. If, after the date of district formation, an affected taxing entity adopts a resolution approving the plan and to participate in the division of taxes used to finance an enhanced infrastructure financing district, existing law requires the division of taxes to be based upon the last equalized assessment roll that is used for the district, as specified. This bill would additionally authorize an affected taxing entity to, at any time after the date of district formation, approve the plan and participate in the division of taxes used to finance the activities of a district, by adopting a resolution of the governing body. (2) Existing law authorizes the creation of community revitalization and investment authorities, as specified, to carry out a community revitalization plan within a community revitalization and investment area. Existing law requires not less than 70% of the land calculated by census tracts, census block groups, as defined, or any combination of both within the area to be characterized by specified conditions, including the annual median household income that is less than, at the option of the authority, 80% of the statewide, countrywide, or citywide annual median income and three of four conditions, including deteriorated commercial or residential structures. This bill would instead require not less than 60% of the land calculated by census tracts, census block groups, as defined, or any combination of both within the area to be characterized by either of the two specified conditions, including the annual median household income that is less than, at the option of the authority, 80% of the statewide, countrywide, or citywide annual median income or three of four conditions, including deteriorated commercial or residential structures. The bill would make related technical, nonsubstantive changes. Existing law requires a community revitalization authority to consider adoption of a community revitalization plan at 3 public hearings, as specified. Existing law requires a community revitalization authority to post a notice of each meeting or public hearing, as specified, in an easily identifiable and accessible location on the authority's internet website and to mail a written notice of the meeting or public hearing to each owner of land and each resident at least 10 days prior to the meeting or public hearing. Existing law also requires notice of each public hearing to be published in a newspaper of general circulation, as specified. This bill would instead require a community revitalization authority to consider adoption of a community revitalization plan at 2 public hearings, as specified, and would make conforming changes. As an alternative to mailing separate mailed notices prior to the meeting or public hearing, the bill would authorize the authority to mail a notice to each landowner, resident, and affected taxing entity at least 40 days before the meeting, as specified. The bill would require the designated contact person, as described, to assemble and maintain an email contact list of all landowners, residents, and other interested parties who have expressed interest in receiving information and materials. Except for the newspaper notices, as described above, the bill would require a notice required by the above-described provisions to be provided in English and in all other languages spoken jointly by 20% or more of the population in the jurisdiction of the county of the proposed authority that speaks English less than "very well" and jointly speaks a language other than English, as specified.

Introduced
2025-03-03
Latest action
2025-10-03 — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 260, Statutes of 2025.
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Carrilloauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2025-02-05

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

  2. 2025-02-06

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 8.

  3. 2025-03-03

    Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

    referral-committee

  4. 2025-03-03

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  5. 2025-03-04

    Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

    referral-committee

  6. 2025-03-06

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  7. 2025-03-10

    Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

    referral-committee

  8. 2025-03-26

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 26).

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage

  9. 2025-03-27

    Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  10. 2025-03-28

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  11. 2025-04-01

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 62. Noes 0.)

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  12. 2025-04-02

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

    reading-1,referral-committee

  13. 2025-05-07

    Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

    referral-committee

  14. 2025-06-18

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 18).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  15. 2025-06-19

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  16. 2025-09-03

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 31. Noes 5. Page 2456.).

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  17. 2025-09-03

    In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.

    committee-passage

  18. 2025-09-09

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

    executive-receipt

  19. 2025-10-03

    Approved by the Governor.

    executive-signature

  20. 2025-10-03

    Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 260, Statutes of 2025.

    became-law

Versions

  • 02/05/25 - Introduced — 2025-02-05Compare
  • 03/03/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-03-03Compare
  • 03/06/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-03-06Compare
  • 03/27/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-03-27Compare
  • 09/05/25 - Enrolled — 2025-09-05Compare
  • 10/03/25 - Chaptered — 2025-10-03Compare
  • AB417Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass as amended.

    2025-03-26 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (10)
    • Stefani: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Ta: other
    • Hoover: other
    • Wilson: other
  • AB 417 Carrillo Assembly Third Reading

    2025-04-01 · pass · 62-0

    Member-level votes (80)
    • Haney: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Ellis: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Hoover: other
    • Alvarez: other
    • Chen: other
    • Sanchez: other
    • Dixon: other
    • Macedo: other
    • Wicks: other
    • Lackey: other
    • Tangipa: other
    • Patterson: other
    • Hadwick: other
    • Ta: other
    • Castillo: other
    • Davies: other
    • Essayli: other
    • Flora: other
    • DeMaio: other
    • Gallagher: other
  • Do pass

    2025-06-18 · pass · 5-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Choi: other
    • Seyarto: other
  • 3rd Reading AB417 Carrillo By Durazo

    2025-09-03 · pass · 31-5

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Becker: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Strickland: no
    • Alvarado-Gil: no
    • Niello: no
    • Grove: no
    • Dahle: no
    • Seyarto: other
    • Ochoa Bogh: other
    • Jones: other
    • Choi: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 417. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.