Bill Commons

CA AB 2705

in committee

Property taxation: tax-defaulted property sales: excess proceeds claims.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA AB 2705 pass?

Not yet. CA AB 2705 is in committee and has not come to a final vote. Latest recorded action (2026-06-24): In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

What is CA AB 2705 about?

Under existing property tax law, if unpaid property taxes are declared delinquent and the taxes remain unpaid, the property is declared tax-defaulted and subject to sale, as provided, if not redeemed by the owner within a certain amount of time. Existing property tax law authorizes any party of interest in property that is sold as a tax-defaulted property to file a claim with the county for the excess proceeds, as described. Existing law requires a person or entity who acts on behalf of, or in place of, any party of interest with respect to filing a claim for any excess proceeds to submit proof with the claim of certain disclosures, including that the party of interest has been advised of their right to file a claim for the excess proceeds on their own behalf directly with the county at no cost. Existing law requires a claim submitted as described above to contain any information and proof deemed necessary by the board of supervisors to establish the claimant's rights to all or any portion of the excess proceeds. This bill would subject an agreement between a party of interest and a person or entity who acts on behalf of, or in place of, a party of interest with respect to filing a claim for any excess proceeds to additional conditions, as specified. In that regard, the bill would require the agreement to, among other things, be in writing and to be signed by the party of interest after receipt of specified information. The bill would exempt specified parties of interest from the provision above and would limit the provision to agreements entered into on or after January 1, 2027. This bill would authorize the county to allow a claimant to correct any insubstantial deficiency in the documentation submitted with the claim as described above, as specified.

Who sponsors CA AB 2705?

Dixon is the primary sponsor of CA AB 2705, joined by 1 cosponsor.

Description

Under existing property tax law, if unpaid property taxes are declared delinquent and the taxes remain unpaid, the property is declared tax-defaulted and subject to sale, as provided, if not redeemed by the owner within a certain amount of time. Existing property tax law authorizes any party of interest in property that is sold as a tax-defaulted property to file a claim with the county for the excess proceeds, as described. Existing law requires a person or entity who acts on behalf of, or in place of, any party of interest with respect to filing a claim for any excess proceeds to submit proof with the claim of certain disclosures, including that the party of interest has been advised of their right to file a claim for the excess proceeds on their own behalf directly with the county at no cost. Existing law requires a claim submitted as described above to contain any information and proof deemed necessary by the board of supervisors to establish the claimant's rights to all or any portion of the excess proceeds. This bill would subject an agreement between a party of interest and a person or entity who acts on behalf of, or in place of, a party of interest with respect to filing a claim for any excess proceeds to additional conditions, as specified. In that regard, the bill would require the agreement to, among other things, be in writing and to be signed by the party of interest after receipt of specified information. The bill would exempt specified parties of interest from the provision above and would limit the provision to agreements entered into on or after January 1, 2027. This bill would authorize the county to allow a claimant to correct any insubstantial deficiency in the documentation submitted with the claim as described above, as specified.

Introduced
2026-06-18
Latest action
2026-06-24 — In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Dixonauthor
  • Hadwickcoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-06-24

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  2. 2026-06-18

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  3. 2026-06-03

    Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.

    referral-committee

  4. 2026-05-21

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

    reading-1,referral-committee

  5. 2026-05-21

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 67. Noes 0. Page 5233.)

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  6. 2026-05-04

    Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 4924.)

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-3

  7. 2026-04-29

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  8. 2026-04-28

    Coauthors revised.

  9. 2026-04-28

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (April 27).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  10. 2026-03-16

    Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.

    referral-committee

  11. 2026-02-21

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  12. 2026-02-20

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

Versions

  • 02/20/26 - Introduced — 2026-02-20Compare
  • 05/04/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-05-04Compare
  • 06/18/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-06-18Compare
  • AB2705Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass.

    2026-04-27 · pass · 4-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • DeMaio: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Carrillo: other
    • Quirk-Silva: other
    • McKinnor: other
  • AB 2705 Dixon Assembly Third Reading

    2026-05-21 · pass · 67-0

    Member-level votes (80)
    • Ta: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Ellis: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • DeMaio: yes
    • Gallagher: yes
    • Johnson: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: other
    • Castillo: other
    • Ramos: other
    • Harabedian: other
    • Jackson: other
    • Calderon: other
    • Fong: other
    • Flora: other
    • Garcia: other
    • Lackey: other
    • Arambula: other
    • Lee: other
    • Chen: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 2705. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.