Bill Commons

CA AB 2690

in committee

Civil actions: provisional remedies: injunctions.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA AB 2690 pass?

Not yet. CA AB 2690 is in committee and has not come to a final vote. Latest recorded action (2026-05-14): In committee: Held under submission.

What is CA AB 2690 about?

Existing law provides that any person who lives, works, owns property, or attends school in the jurisdiction of a local agency, as defined, who is assessed for and is liable to pay, or within one year before the commencement of the action, has paid, a tax in the local agency, may maintain an action to obtain a judgment restraining and preventing an illegal expenditure of, waste of, or injury to the estate, funds, or other property of the local agency, as specified. Under existing law, a tax that funds the defendant local agency is sufficient to confer standing as a taxpayer, including, but not limited to, an income tax, a sales and use tax or transaction and use tax initially paid by a consumer to a retailer, a property tax, or a business license tax. This bill would expand the scope of this cause of action and standing to permit a person to maintain an action against the state or a state entity.

Who sponsors CA AB 2690?

Davies is the primary sponsor of CA AB 2690.

Description

Existing law provides that any person who lives, works, owns property, or attends school in the jurisdiction of a local agency, as defined, who is assessed for and is liable to pay, or within one year before the commencement of the action, has paid, a tax in the local agency, may maintain an action to obtain a judgment restraining and preventing an illegal expenditure of, waste of, or injury to the estate, funds, or other property of the local agency, as specified. Under existing law, a tax that funds the defendant local agency is sufficient to confer standing as a taxpayer, including, but not limited to, an income tax, a sales and use tax or transaction and use tax initially paid by a consumer to a retailer, a property tax, or a business license tax. This bill would expand the scope of this cause of action and standing to permit a person to maintain an action against the state or a state entity.

Introduced
2026-03-18
Latest action
2026-05-14 — In committee: Held under submission.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Daviesauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-05-14

    Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 5030.)

  2. 2026-05-14

    In committee: Held under submission.

  3. 2026-05-13

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

    referral-committee

  4. 2026-05-04

    (Ayes 55. Noes 19. Page 4895.)

  5. 2026-05-04

    Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 97.

    referral-committee

  6. 2026-04-09

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  7. 2026-04-08

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 1.) (April 7).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  8. 2026-03-19

    Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    referral-committee

  9. 2026-03-18

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  10. 2026-03-16

    Referred to Com. on JUD.

    referral-committee

  11. 2026-02-21

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  12. 2026-02-20

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass.

    2026-04-07 · pass · 10-1

    Member-level votes (12)
    • Macedo: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Zbur: no
    • Lee: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 2690. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.