Bill Commons

CA AB 2511

in committee

Behavioral Health Provider Comparable Worth Study.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Description

Existing law establishes the Department of Industrial Relations in the Labor and Workforce Development Agency and provides that one of the functions of the department is to foster, promote, and develop the welfare of the wage earners of California, to improve their working conditions, and to advance their opportunities for profitable employment. This bill would require the department, in consultation with the Department of Managed Health Care, the Department of Insurance, the Department of Health Care Access and Information, and the Office of Health Care Affordability, to conduct a comparable worth study to examine and compare compensation and reimbursement for behavioral health providers with compensation and reimbursement for similarly situated medical-surgical providers. The bill would require the study to analyze compensation and reimbursement across specified payment flows, including payments made by health care service plans and health insurers directly to behavioral health providers and medical-surgical providers, and payments made to intermediaries and health systems for behavioral health services and medical-surgical services. The bill would require the department to take certain actions in conducting the study, including developing a methodology for determining which behavioral health provider roles are comparable to which medical-surgical provider roles. The bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer to report certain data to the department with respect to payments made directly to providers and payments made to intermediaries and health systems. The bill would also require specified intermediaries and health systems to report certain data to the department relating to payments received and payments made. The bill would make an entity that fails to comply with the reporting requirements subject to civil penalty, as prescribed. The bill would require the department and the other state entities listed above to protect the confidentiality of any propriety or commercially sensitive information submitted pursuant to the bill, as provided. The bill would require the department, on or before January 1, 2028, to submit a report to the Legislature containing the findings of the study. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.

Introduced
Status date
Latest action
2026-05-14 — In committee: Held under submission.
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Ahrensauthor
  • : Pellerincoauthor
  • Kalracoauthor
  • Calozacoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2026-02-20

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

  2. 2026-02-21

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  3. 2026-03-16

    Referred to Coms. on L. & E. and HEALTH.

    referral-committee

  4. 2026-04-09

    Coauthors revised.

  5. 2026-04-09

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  6. 2026-04-22

    Coauthors revised.

  7. 2026-04-22

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (April 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  8. 2026-05-06

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

    referral-committee

  9. 2026-05-14

    In committee: Held under submission.

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Health]

    2026-04-08 · pass · 5-2

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Chen: no
    • Lackey: no
  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-04-21 · pass · 11-1

    Member-level votes (16)
    • Patel: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Patterson: no
    • Carrillo: other
    • Chen: other
    • Sanchez: other
    • Johnson: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 2511. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.