Bill Commons

CA AB 2433

enacted

Housing development: density bonus.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA AB 2433 pass?

Yes. CA AB 2433 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-09-29): Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 800, Statutes of 2026.

What is CA AB 2433 about?

(1) Existing law, commonly referred to as the Density Bonus Law, requires a city or county to grant a density bonus, other incentives or concessions, and waivers or reductions of development standards, as specified, to an applicant for a housing development when the applicant seeks a density bonus for the housing development, as specified, if the applicant agrees to construct, among other things, a specified percentage of units for very low income, lower income, or senior citizen housing, and meets other requirements. This bill would, instead, require a city or county to grant a density bonus, other incentives or concessions, and waivers or reductions of development standards, as specified, to an applicant for a housing development when the applicant submits an application for a housing development that a city, county, or city and county determines meets specified criteria, including, among others, the housing development includes specified percentage of units for very low income, lower income, or senior citizen housing. (2) Existing law defines density bonus for the purposes of the Density Bonus Law to mean a density increase over the otherwise base density, as specified. Existing law specifies the base density calculation standards and requires base density to be determined using dwelling units per acre, except as otherwise provided. For the purpose of calculating a density bonus, existing law requires the residential units to be on contiguous sites that are the subject of one development application, as specified. Existing law also requires the density bonus to be permitted in geographic areas of the housing development other than the areas where the units for the lower income households are located. This bill would allow an applicant who provides a base density study, as defined, to elect to receive a density bonus in the form of a percentage increase in maximum floor area ratio, as specified. The bill would create an additional exception to the requirement that base density be determined using dwelling units per acre for applicants who elect to provide a base density study. This bill would revise and recast the provisions related to permitting of a density bonus relative to the geographic area to instead require a density bonus, incentive, or concession, or waiver or reduction, on sites that are the subject of the same housing development, as specified. (3) Existing law requires a city or county to adopt procedures and timelines for processing a density bonus application and to notify the applicant for a density bonus whether the application is complete in a manner consistent with specified timelines. If the local government notifies the applicant that the application is deemed complete, this bill would require the city or county to provide the applicant with a determination that the project is eligible for a density bonus. (4) Existing law authorizes an applicant for a density bonus to submit to a city or county a proposal for the specific incentives or concessions that the applicant requests and requires the city or county to grant the concession or incentive requested by the applicant unless the city or county makes a certain written finding, based upon substantial evidence. Existing law specifies the number of incentives or concessions an applicant is eligible to receive based on certain criteria. This bill would make revisions to certain of those calculations related to incentives or concessions. (5) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. Existing law specifies that the granting of a density bonus or incentive or concessions shall not require or be interpreted to require a general plan amendment, local coastal plan amendment, zoning change, or other discretionary approval. Existing law also specifies that the granting of an incentive or concessions shall not require or be interpreted to require a study. This bill would specify that the granting of a waiver or reduction of development standards shall not require or be interpreted to require a general plan amendment, local coastal plan amendment, zoning change, study, or other discretionary approval. The bill would also specify that the granting of a density bonus, incentive or concession, or waiver or reduction of development standards shall not be discretionary. The bill would specify that the granting of a density bonus, incentive or concession, or waiver or reduction of development standards shall not require or be interpreted to require environmental review under CEQA. (6) The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. (7) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 65915 of the Government Code proposed by AB 2480, SB 1383, or both, to be operative only if this bill and AB 2480, SB 1383, or both, are enacted and this bill is enacted last. (8) By imposing new requirements on local governments, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Who sponsors CA AB 2433?

Alvarez is the primary sponsor of CA AB 2433, joined by 2 cosponsors.

Description

(1) Existing law, commonly referred to as the Density Bonus Law, requires a city or county to grant a density bonus, other incentives or concessions, and waivers or reductions of development standards, as specified, to an applicant for a housing development when the applicant seeks a density bonus for the housing development, as specified, if the applicant agrees to construct, among other things, a specified percentage of units for very low income, lower income, or senior citizen housing, and meets other requirements. This bill would, instead, require a city or county to grant a density bonus, other incentives or concessions, and waivers or reductions of development standards, as specified, to an applicant for a housing development when the applicant submits an application for a housing development that a city, county, or city and county determines meets specified criteria, including, among others, the housing development includes specified percentage of units for very low income, lower income, or senior citizen housing. (2) Existing law defines density bonus for the purposes of the Density Bonus Law to mean a density increase over the otherwise base density, as specified. Existing law specifies the base density calculation standards and requires base density to be determined using dwelling units per acre, except as otherwise provided. For the purpose of calculating a density bonus, existing law requires the residential units to be on contiguous sites that are the subject of one development application, as specified. Existing law also requires the density bonus to be permitted in geographic areas of the housing development other than the areas where the units for the lower income households are located. This bill would allow an applicant who provides a base density study, as defined, to elect to receive a density bonus in the form of a percentage increase in maximum floor area ratio, as specified. The bill would create an additional exception to the requirement that base density be determined using dwelling units per acre for applicants who elect to provide a base density study. This bill would revise and recast the provisions related to permitting of a density bonus relative to the geographic area to instead require a density bonus, incentive, or concession, or waiver or reduction, on sites that are the subject of the same housing development, as specified. (3) Existing law requires a city or county to adopt procedures and timelines for processing a density bonus application and to notify the applicant for a density bonus whether the application is complete in a manner consistent with specified timelines. If the local government notifies the applicant that the application is deemed complete, this bill would require the city or county to provide the applicant with a determination that the project is eligible for a density bonus. (4) Existing law authorizes an applicant for a density bonus to submit to a city or county a proposal for the specific incentives or concessions that the applicant requests and requires the city or county to grant the concession or incentive requested by the applicant unless the city or county makes a certain written finding, based upon substantial evidence. Existing law specifies the number of incentives or concessions an applicant is eligible to receive based on certain criteria. This bill would make revisions to certain of those calculations related to incentives or concessions. (5) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. Existing law specifies that the granting of a density bonus or incentive or concessions shall not require or be interpreted to require a general plan amendment, local coastal plan amendment, zoning change, or other discretionary approval. Existing law also specifies that the granting of an incentive or concessions shall not require or be interpreted to require a study. This bill would specify that the granting of a waiver or reduction of development standards shall not require or be interpreted to require a general plan amendment, local coastal plan amendment, zoning change, study, or other discretionary approval. The bill would also specify that the granting of a density bonus, incentive or concession, or waiver or reduction of development standards shall not be discretionary. The bill would specify that the granting of a density bonus, incentive or concession, or waiver or reduction of development standards shall not require or be interpreted to require environmental review under CEQA. (6) The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. (7) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 65915 of the Government Code proposed by AB 2480, SB 1383, or both, to be operative only if this bill and AB 2480, SB 1383, or both, are enacted and this bill is enacted last. (8) By imposing new requirements on local governments, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Introduced
2026-03-25
Latest action
2026-09-29 — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 800, Statutes of 2026.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Alvarezauthor
  • Bryancoauthor
  • Wickscoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-09-29

    Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 800, Statutes of 2026.

    became-law

  2. 2026-09-29

    Approved by the Governor.

    executive-signature

  3. 2026-09-10

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

    executive-receipt

  4. 2026-08-30

    Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling.

  5. 2026-08-30

    Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 70. Noes 0.).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  6. 2026-08-30

    Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 70. Noes 0. Page 6877.).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  7. 2026-08-28

    In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  8. 2026-08-27

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0.).

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  9. 2026-08-24

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  10. 2026-08-20

    Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  11. 2026-08-11

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  12. 2026-08-10

    Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  13. 2026-08-04

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  14. 2026-08-03

    From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

    committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  15. 2026-06-30

    Withdrawn from committee.

    withdrawal

  16. 2026-06-30

    Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    referral-committee

  17. 2026-06-29

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  18. 2026-06-25

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on E.Q. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 24).

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee

  19. 2026-06-23

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HOUSING. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on HOUSING.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  20. 2026-06-10

    Referred to Coms. on L. GOV., HOUSING and E.Q.

    referral-committee

  21. 2026-05-28

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

    reading-1,referral-committee

  22. 2026-05-27

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 67. Noes 0.)

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  23. 2026-05-27

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 67. Noes 0. Page 5441.)

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  24. 2026-05-14

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  25. 2026-05-13

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (May 13).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  26. 2026-05-06

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  27. 2026-04-23

    Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    referral-committee

  28. 2026-04-22

    Read second time and amended.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  29. 2026-04-21

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (April 20).

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee

  30. 2026-04-16

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 15). Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  31. 2026-04-13

    (Pending re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES.)

    referral-committee

  32. 2026-04-13

    Assembly Rule 56 suspended. (Page 4581.)

  33. 2026-04-08

    Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

    referral-committee

  34. 2026-04-07

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  35. 2026-04-06

    Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

    referral-committee

  36. 2026-03-26

    Read second time and amended.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  37. 2026-03-25

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (March 25).

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee

  38. 2026-03-09

    Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D., L. GOV. and NAT. RES.

    referral-committee

  39. 2026-02-21

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  40. 2026-02-20

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

Versions

  • 02/20/26 - Introduced — 2026-02-20Compare
  • 03/26/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-03-26Compare
  • 04/07/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-04-07Compare
  • 04/22/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-04-22Compare
  • 06/29/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-06-29Compare
  • 08/10/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-08-10Compare
  • 08/20/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-08-20Compare
  • 09/03/26 - Enrolled — 2026-09-03Compare
  • 09/29/26 - Chaptered — 2026-09-29Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare
  • AB2433Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Local Government]

    2026-03-25 · pass · 12-0

    Member-level votes (12)
    • Patterson: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Ta: yes

  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Natural Resources]

    2026-04-15 · pass · 10-0

    Member-level votes (10)
    • Wilson: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Johnson: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Ta: yes

  • Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-04-20 · pass · 11-1

    Member-level votes (14)
    • Zbur: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Ellis: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Muratsuchi: no
    • Connolly: other
    • Pellerin: other

  • Do pass.

    2026-05-13 · pass · 13-0

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Ellis: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Tangipa: other
    • Pellerin: other

  • AB 2433 Alvarez Assembly Third Reading

    2026-05-27 · pass · 67-0

    Member-level votes (80)
    • Bennett: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Johnson: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Flora: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Ellis: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • DeMaio: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Castillo: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Gallagher: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Addis: other
    • Pellerin: other
    • Petrie-Norris: other
    • Connolly: other
    • Boerner: other
    • Celeste Rodriguez: other
    • Patel: other
    • Rogers: other
    • Ortega: other
    • Tangipa: other
    • Aguiar-Curry: other
    • Irwin: other
    • Muratsuchi: other

  • Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Housing]

    2026-06-23 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Choi: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Seyarto: yes

  • Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Environmental Quality]

    2026-06-24 · pass · 10-0

    Member-level votes (10)
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Padilla: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB2433

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-10-01T14:22:33.041986Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changesStatus and relationship changes

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Bulk imports for this sessionSession dates and activity

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 2433. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.