Bill Commons

CA AB 2389

in committee

Property taxation: active solar energy systems: customer sited: extension.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA AB 2389 pass?

Not yet. CA AB 2389 is in committee and has not come to a final vote. Latest recorded action (2026-05-14): In committee: Held under submission.

What is CA AB 2389 about?

The California Constitution generally limits the maximum rate of ad valorem tax on real property to 1% of the full cash value of the property and defines "full cash value" for these purposes as the appraised value of real property when purchased, newly constructed, or a change in ownership has occurred after the 1975 assessment. Pursuant to constitutional authorization, existing property tax law excludes from the definition of "newly constructed" for these purposes the construction or addition of any active solar energy system, as defined, through the 2025–26 fiscal year, including the construction of an active solar energy system incorporated by the owner-builder in the initial construction of a new building that the owner-builder does not intend to occupy or use. This bill would extend, for lien dates commencing on or after January 1, 2027, and before January 1, 2031, the above-described exclusion for the addition of customer-sited, active solar energy systems with a system size of less than or equal to 10 kilowatts and for customer-sited, active solar energy systems that are sited on the property of a public entity customer. The bill would require that, for active solar energy systems sited on the property of a public entity customer, tax savings be utilized to maintain the affordability of, or to reduce the cost of, future lease agreements. The bill would limit the exclusion for active solar energy systems incorporated by the owner-builder to buildings where the initial construction permit for the new building is dated before January 1, 2027. The bill would make conforming changes. By imposing additional duties on local tax officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires bills authorizing a new tax expenditure, as defined, to contain, among other things, specific goals that the tax expenditure will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements. This bill also would include additional information required for bills authorizing a new tax expenditure. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. Existing law requires the state to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding those provisions, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Who sponsors CA AB 2389?

Irwin is the primary sponsor of CA AB 2389, joined by 2 cosponsors.

Description

The California Constitution generally limits the maximum rate of ad valorem tax on real property to 1% of the full cash value of the property and defines "full cash value" for these purposes as the appraised value of real property when purchased, newly constructed, or a change in ownership has occurred after the 1975 assessment. Pursuant to constitutional authorization, existing property tax law excludes from the definition of "newly constructed" for these purposes the construction or addition of any active solar energy system, as defined, through the 2025–26 fiscal year, including the construction of an active solar energy system incorporated by the owner-builder in the initial construction of a new building that the owner-builder does not intend to occupy or use. This bill would extend, for lien dates commencing on or after January 1, 2027, and before January 1, 2031, the above-described exclusion for the addition of customer-sited, active solar energy systems with a system size of less than or equal to 10 kilowatts and for customer-sited, active solar energy systems that are sited on the property of a public entity customer. The bill would require that, for active solar energy systems sited on the property of a public entity customer, tax savings be utilized to maintain the affordability of, or to reduce the cost of, future lease agreements. The bill would limit the exclusion for active solar energy systems incorporated by the owner-builder to buildings where the initial construction permit for the new building is dated before January 1, 2027. The bill would make conforming changes. By imposing additional duties on local tax officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires bills authorizing a new tax expenditure, as defined, to contain, among other things, specific goals that the tax expenditure will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements. This bill also would include additional information required for bills authorizing a new tax expenditure. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. Existing law requires the state to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding those provisions, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Introduced
2026-04-20
Latest action
2026-05-14 — In committee: Held under submission.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Irwinauthor
  • McNerneyprincipal coauthor
  • Blakespearcoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-05-14

    In committee: Held under submission.

  2. 2026-05-14

    Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 5030.)

  3. 2026-05-13

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

    referral-committee

  4. 2026-04-30

    Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    referral-committee

  5. 2026-04-29

    Read second time and amended.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  6. 2026-04-28

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 27).

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee

  7. 2026-04-21

    Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.

    referral-committee

  8. 2026-04-20

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on REV. & TAX. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  9. 2026-04-06

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to REV. & TAX. suspense file.

    referral-committee

  10. 2026-03-09

    Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.

    referral-committee

  11. 2026-02-21

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  12. 2026-02-20

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

Versions

  • 02/20/26 - Introduced — 2026-02-20Compare
  • 04/20/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-04-20Compare
  • 04/29/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-04-29Compare
  • AB2389Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-04-27 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • DeMaio: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 2389. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.