Bill Commons

CA AB 2327

in committee

Medi-Cal: subcontractors: rates.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA AB 2327 pass?

Not yet. CA AB 2327 is in committee and has not come to a final vote. Latest recorded action (2026-05-14): In committee: Held under submission.

What is CA AB 2327 about?

Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services under fee-for-service or managed care delivery systems. The Medi-Cal program is in part governed by, and funded pursuant to, federal Medicaid program provisions. Existing law sets forth various provisions relating to the department determining capitation rates for Medi-Cal managed care plans using actuarial methods and a certain methodology that considers, among other factors, utilization and cost data. Relative to these provisions of existing law, in 2023, the department entered into a multi-party settlement agreement for Medi-Cal managed care procurement for plan years beginning January 1, 2024, with specified Medi-Cal managed care plans and certain subcontracting plans. This bill would authorize a subcontracting plan subject to the above-described agreement to request a review of the Medi-Cal managed care rates paid by the primary plan for a particular rating period, as specified. The bill would require the department to direct an independent, qualified actuarial consultant to review those rates upon a showing by the subcontracting plan that certain conditions have occurred or are likely to occur, including, among others, a medical loss ratio in excess of 93% for the preceding 12-month period. If the department determines that the rates paid by the primary plan to the subcontracting plan for a particular rating period are not actuarially sound, the bill would require the department to order a revision of those rates, as specified. The bill would make any failure by the department to comply with these provisions reviewable and subject to appeal at the request of the subcontracting plan through a notice of dispute pursuant to the terms of the Medi-Cal managed care contract. The bill would require these disputes to be concluded and resolved within 120 calendar days of the initial request. The bill would authorize the department to implement, interpret, or make specific these provisions through the use of all-county letters, plan letters, plan bulletins, amendments to the state Medi-Cal managed care contract, or similar instructions without taking any further regulatory action.

Who sponsors CA AB 2327?

Lowenthal is the primary sponsor of CA AB 2327.

Description

Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services under fee-for-service or managed care delivery systems. The Medi-Cal program is in part governed by, and funded pursuant to, federal Medicaid program provisions. Existing law sets forth various provisions relating to the department determining capitation rates for Medi-Cal managed care plans using actuarial methods and a certain methodology that considers, among other factors, utilization and cost data. Relative to these provisions of existing law, in 2023, the department entered into a multi-party settlement agreement for Medi-Cal managed care procurement for plan years beginning January 1, 2024, with specified Medi-Cal managed care plans and certain subcontracting plans. This bill would authorize a subcontracting plan subject to the above-described agreement to request a review of the Medi-Cal managed care rates paid by the primary plan for a particular rating period, as specified. The bill would require the department to direct an independent, qualified actuarial consultant to review those rates upon a showing by the subcontracting plan that certain conditions have occurred or are likely to occur, including, among others, a medical loss ratio in excess of 93% for the preceding 12-month period. If the department determines that the rates paid by the primary plan to the subcontracting plan for a particular rating period are not actuarially sound, the bill would require the department to order a revision of those rates, as specified. The bill would make any failure by the department to comply with these provisions reviewable and subject to appeal at the request of the subcontracting plan through a notice of dispute pursuant to the terms of the Medi-Cal managed care contract. The bill would require these disputes to be concluded and resolved within 120 calendar days of the initial request. The bill would authorize the department to implement, interpret, or make specific these provisions through the use of all-county letters, plan letters, plan bulletins, amendments to the state Medi-Cal managed care contract, or similar instructions without taking any further regulatory action.

Introduced
2026-04-27
Latest action
2026-05-14 — In committee: Held under submission.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Lowenthalauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-05-14

    In committee: Held under submission.

  2. 2026-05-06

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

    referral-committee

  3. 2026-04-29

    Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    referral-committee

  4. 2026-04-28

    Read second time and amended.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  5. 2026-04-27

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 21).

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee

  6. 2026-03-09

    Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

    referral-committee

  7. 2026-02-20

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

  8. 2026-02-19

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-04-21 · pass · 15-0

    Member-level votes (16)
    • Patel: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Johnson: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 2327. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.