Bill Commons

CA AB 2109

Status unknown

California bar examination.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA AB 2109 pass?

The current status of CA AB 2109 is not known from the official record. Latest recorded action (2026-06-10): Referred to Com. on JUD.

What is CA AB 2109 about?

The State Bar Act provides for the licensure and regulation of attorneys by the State Bar of California, a public corporation governed by a board of trustees. Existing law authorizes the board of trustees to establish an examining committee, also known as the Committee of Bar Examiners, and requires an applicant for a license to practice law to pass the general bar examination, known as the California bar examination, given by the examining committee. Existing law prohibits the examining committee from altering the bar examination in a manner that requires the substantial modification of the training or preparation required for passage of the examination, except after giving 2 years' notice of that change. Existing law requires the Committee of Bar Examiners, on or before November 30, 2026, to provide a report to the board of trustees, the Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court, and to the Assembly and Senate Committees on Judiciary on whether adopting a uniform bar examination would be more efficient to administer and lower the cost of administration for the State Bar and examinees. This bill would require the examining committee, on January 1, 2029, to replace the California bar examination with the National Conference of Bar Examiners' Uniform Bar Examination or any successor or replacement of that exam.

Who sponsors CA AB 2109?

Dixon is the primary sponsor of CA AB 2109.

Description

The State Bar Act provides for the licensure and regulation of attorneys by the State Bar of California, a public corporation governed by a board of trustees. Existing law authorizes the board of trustees to establish an examining committee, also known as the Committee of Bar Examiners, and requires an applicant for a license to practice law to pass the general bar examination, known as the California bar examination, given by the examining committee. Existing law prohibits the examining committee from altering the bar examination in a manner that requires the substantial modification of the training or preparation required for passage of the examination, except after giving 2 years' notice of that change. Existing law requires the Committee of Bar Examiners, on or before November 30, 2026, to provide a report to the board of trustees, the Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court, and to the Assembly and Senate Committees on Judiciary on whether adopting a uniform bar examination would be more efficient to administer and lower the cost of administration for the State Bar and examinees. This bill would require the examining committee, on January 1, 2029, to replace the California bar examination with the National Conference of Bar Examiners' Uniform Bar Examination or any successor or replacement of that exam.

Introduced
2026-03-17
Latest action
2026-06-10 — Referred to Com. on JUD.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Dixonauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-06-10

    Referred to Com. on JUD.

    referral-committee

  2. 2026-05-28

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

    reading-1,referral-committee

  3. 2026-05-27

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0.)

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  4. 2026-05-27

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 5438.)

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  5. 2026-03-25

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  6. 2026-03-24

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (March 24).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  7. 2026-03-18

    Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    referral-committee

  8. 2026-03-17

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  9. 2026-03-02

    Referred to Com. on JUD.

    referral-committee

  10. 2026-02-19

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.

  11. 2026-02-18

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass.

    2026-03-24 · pass · 12-0

    Member-level votes (12)
    • Zbur: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
  • AB 2109 Dixon Assembly Third Reading

    2026-05-27 · pass · 73-0

    Member-level votes (80)
    • Bennett: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Johnson: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Ellis: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • DeMaio: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Castillo: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Gallagher: other
    • Celeste Rodriguez: other
    • Krell: other
    • Flora: other
    • Lee: other
    • Schultz: other
    • Jackson: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-10-18T10:59:28.238688Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 2109. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.