CA AB 1977
enactedNotaries public.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CA AB 1977 pass?
Yes. CA AB 1977 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-09-18): Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 280, Statutes of 2026.
What is CA AB 1977 about?
Existing law authorizes the Secretary of State to appoint and commission notaries public. Existing law requires a notary public who holds a California notary public commission, when applying for reappointment, to have completed a 3-hour refresher course of study prior to reappointment. This bill would also require the applicant to have satisfactorily completed a written examination prescribed by the Secretary of State, as specified. Existing law establishes the duties of a notary public, which include taking the acknowledgment or proof of specified legal documents, taking depositions and affidavits, administering oaths, and certifying copies of powers of attorney. Existing law requires a notary, in performing these duties, to give a certificate of proof or acknowledgment, endorsed or attached to the instrument, signed by the notary in their own handwriting. This bill would authorize a notary to instead sign with their electronic signature when performing these duties. The bill would require the electronic signature to include an image of the notary public's handwritten signature and would allow that electronic signature to be kept on a storage device or online media that is accessed by the notary public with a secure means of multifactor authentication and protection, as prescribed. Existing law requires the Secretary of State to issue a permit with a sequential identification number to each manufacturer or vendor authorized to issue notary seals, and authorizes the Secretary of State to establish a fee for issuing the permit. This bill would instead require the fee to be $100. Existing law, the Online Notarization Act, establishes a framework for authorizing and regulating online notarizations that become operative after the Secretary of State completes a technology project necessary to implement those provisions no later than January 1, 2030, unless further delayed, as specified. After completion of the technology project, the Online Notarization Act authorizes an applicant for a commission as a notary public to apply for registration with the Secretary of State to perform online notarizations and establishes requirements for application and qualification and for performing online notarizations. The act requires a notary public to record each online notarial act performed by the notary public in one tangible sequential journal and one or more secure electronic journals. The act authorizes a person or entity to apply for registration with the Secretary of State to be an online notarization platform or depository, and establishes requirements for application and for conducting business as an online notarization platform or depository. The Online Notarization Act requires an applicant for registration to perform online notarizations to have satisfactorily completed a specified 2-hour course of study approved by the Secretary of State concerning the functions and duties of a notary public authorized to perform online notarizations. This bill would require the Secretary of State to review the course of study proposed by any vendor to be offered pursuant to those provisions. The Online Notarization Act requires a notary public's electronic signature to include an image of the notary public's handwritten signature. This bill would require the signature to match the notary public's handwritten signature on their official oath, as specified. The Online Notarization Act limits the fee amounts that a notary public may charge for taking the acknowledgment of a deed or other instrument and for administering an oath or affirmation to one person and executing the jurat, as specified. This bill would prohibit a notary public from charging a fee for these services unless the online notarial act is completed. The bill would authorize a notary public to charge a technology fee for a terminated online notarial act session if the termination is due to one of specified reasons, and would limit that fee to the actual and reasonable cost incurred by the notary public for the use of the online notarization platform. The Online Notarization Act requires a person or entity to apply for registration with the Secretary of State to be an online notarization platform or depository on an application for registration that includes specified information. The act authorizes the Secretary of State to charge a fee for an application for registration. This bill would require the person or entity to apply annually thereafter for renewal of registration during the applicable time period, as specified. The bill would authorize an online notarization platform or depository, if there has been no change in the information in the last filed application for registration, to advise the Secretary of State that no changes in the required information have occurred during the applicable filing period. The bill would require an online notarization platform or depository to file an updated application for registration whenever any of the information required in the application is changed, and would require the Secretary of State to charge a fee of $50 to file an updated application. The bill would require the Secretary of State to charge a fee of $5,000 for an initial application for registration and a $1,000 fee for a renewal of registration. The Online Notarization Act requires an online notarization platform or depository, if certain events occur, to notify each notary public that used the online notarization platform or depository at least 30 days before the event, including if the online notarization platform ceases to provide an online notarization system or depository for use within California. This bill would require the online notarization platform or depository to also notify the Secretary of State at least 30 days before those events by submitting the notice electronically through the Secretary of State's web portal. The bill would require the Secretary of State to post information on its internet website demonstrating that a notarization platform or depository is registered with the Secretary of State to perform online notarization, as specified. The bill would make other technical, conforming, and nonsubstantive changes to the provisions regulating notaries public.
Who sponsors CA AB 1977?
Irwin is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1977.
Description
Existing law authorizes the Secretary of State to appoint and commission notaries public. Existing law requires a notary public who holds a California notary public commission, when applying for reappointment, to have completed a 3-hour refresher course of study prior to reappointment. This bill would also require the applicant to have satisfactorily completed a written examination prescribed by the Secretary of State, as specified. Existing law establishes the duties of a notary public, which include taking the acknowledgment or proof of specified legal documents, taking depositions and affidavits, administering oaths, and certifying copies of powers of attorney. Existing law requires a notary, in performing these duties, to give a certificate of proof or acknowledgment, endorsed or attached to the instrument, signed by the notary in their own handwriting. This bill would authorize a notary to instead sign with their electronic signature when performing these duties. The bill would require the electronic signature to include an image of the notary public's handwritten signature and would allow that electronic signature to be kept on a storage device or online media that is accessed by the notary public with a secure means of multifactor authentication and protection, as prescribed. Existing law requires the Secretary of State to issue a permit with a sequential identification number to each manufacturer or vendor authorized to issue notary seals, and authorizes the Secretary of State to establish a fee for issuing the permit. This bill would instead require the fee to be $100. Existing law, the Online Notarization Act, establishes a framework for authorizing and regulating online notarizations that become operative after the Secretary of State completes a technology project necessary to implement those provisions no later than January 1, 2030, unless further delayed, as specified. After completion of the technology project, the Online Notarization Act authorizes an applicant for a commission as a notary public to apply for registration with the Secretary of State to perform online notarizations and establishes requirements for application and qualification and for performing online notarizations. The act requires a notary public to record each online notarial act performed by the notary public in one tangible sequential journal and one or more secure electronic journals. The act authorizes a person or entity to apply for registration with the Secretary of State to be an online notarization platform or depository, and establishes requirements for application and for conducting business as an online notarization platform or depository. The Online Notarization Act requires an applicant for registration to perform online notarizations to have satisfactorily completed a specified 2-hour course of study approved by the Secretary of State concerning the functions and duties of a notary public authorized to perform online notarizations. This bill would require the Secretary of State to review the course of study proposed by any vendor to be offered pursuant to those provisions. The Online Notarization Act requires a notary public's electronic signature to include an image of the notary public's handwritten signature. This bill would require the signature to match the notary public's handwritten signature on their official oath, as specified. The Online Notarization Act limits the fee amounts that a notary public may charge for taking the acknowledgment of a deed or other instrument and for administering an oath or affirmation to one person and executing the jurat, as specified. This bill would prohibit a notary public from charging a fee for these services unless the online notarial act is completed. The bill would authorize a notary public to charge a technology fee for a terminated online notarial act session if the termination is due to one of specified reasons, and would limit that fee to the actual and reasonable cost incurred by the notary public for the use of the online notarization platform. The Online Notarization Act requires a person or entity to apply for registration with the Secretary of State to be an online notarization platform or depository on an application for registration that includes specified information. The act authorizes the Secretary of State to charge a fee for an application for registration. This bill would require the person or entity to apply annually thereafter for renewal of registration during the applicable time period, as specified. The bill would authorize an online notarization platform or depository, if there has been no change in the information in the last filed application for registration, to advise the Secretary of State that no changes in the required information have occurred during the applicable filing period. The bill would require an online notarization platform or depository to file an updated application for registration whenever any of the information required in the application is changed, and would require the Secretary of State to charge a fee of $50 to file an updated application. The bill would require the Secretary of State to charge a fee of $5,000 for an initial application for registration and a $1,000 fee for a renewal of registration. The Online Notarization Act requires an online notarization platform or depository, if certain events occur, to notify each notary public that used the online notarization platform or depository at least 30 days before the event, including if the online notarization platform ceases to provide an online notarization system or depository for use within California. This bill would require the online notarization platform or depository to also notify the Secretary of State at least 30 days before those events by submitting the notice electronically through the Secretary of State's web portal. The bill would require the Secretary of State to post information on its internet website demonstrating that a notarization platform or depository is registered with the Secretary of State to perform online notarization, as specified. The bill would make other technical, conforming, and nonsubstantive changes to the provisions regulating notaries public.
- Introduced
- 2026-05-27
- Latest action
- 2026-09-18 — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 280, Statutes of 2026.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Irwinauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-09-18
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 280, Statutes of 2026.
became-law
2026-09-18
Approved by the Governor.
executive-signature
2026-08-25
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
2026-08-19
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 62. Noes 9.).
2026-08-19
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 62. Noes 9. Page 6250.).
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-08-17
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 29. Noes 10.).
2026-08-17
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
2026-08-17
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 29. Noes 10. Page 5490.).
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-06-16
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-06-15
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2
2026-06-10
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 2.) (June 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2026-05-27
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-05-06
Referred to Com. on JUD.
referral-committee
2026-04-13
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
reading-1,referral-committee
2026-04-13
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 61. Noes 5. Page 4589.)
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-04-09
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-04-08
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (April 8).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-03-17
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (March 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2026-03-02
Referred to Com. on JUD.
referral-committee
2026-02-14
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
2026-02-13
Read first time. To print.
reading-1
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
2026-03-17 · pass · 9-1
Member-level votes (12)
- Bryan: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Papan: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Sanchez: no
- Dixon: other
- Macedo: other
Do pass.
2026-04-08 · pass · 11-1
Member-level votes (15)
- Muratsuchi: yes
- Krell: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Tangipa: yes
- Fong: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Solache: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Ta: no
- Dixon: other
- Hoover: other
- Calderon: other
AB 1977 Irwin Assembly Third Reading
2026-04-13 · pass · 61-5
Member-level votes (80)
- Arambula: yes
- Boerner: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Solache: yes
- Jeff Gonzalez: yes
- Ramos: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Patel: yes
- Gabriel: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Muratsuchi: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Fong: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Addis: yes
- Ward: yes
- Irwin: yes
- Gipson: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Bennett: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Rivas: yes
- Papan: yes
- Quirk-Silva: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Berman: yes
- Haney: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Petrie-Norris: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Alvarez: yes
- Tangipa: yes
- Krell: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Bains: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Hart: yes
- Alanis: yes
- Soria: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Wallis: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Bonta: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Ta: no
- Davies: no
- Hadwick: no
- DeMaio: no
- Ellis: no
- Hoover: other
- Johnson: other
- Lee: other
- Valencia: other
- Castillo: other
- Dixon: other
- Flora: other
- Lackey: other
- Sanchez: other
- Chen: other
- Patterson: other
- Macedo: other
- Gallagher: other
- Celeste Rodriguez: other
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
2026-06-09 · pass · 10-2
Member-level votes (13)
- Wahab: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Laird: yes
- Allen: yes
- Reyes: yes
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Valladares: no
- Niello: no
- Stern: other
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-09-21T02:53:48.612860Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1977. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.