CA AB 1976
enactedStreets and highways: pedestrian and bicycle facilities.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CA AB 1976 pass?
Yes. CA AB 1976 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-09-27): Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 565, Statutes of 2026.
What is CA AB 1976 about?
(1) Existing law grants the legislative body of a city certain powers with respect to city streets and highways, including the power to construct and maintain those streets and highways. Existing law grants the board of supervisors of a county general supervision, management, and control of county highways and authorizes the board of supervisors to lay out, construct, improve, and maintain county highways. This bill would prohibit a city or county from holding a community input meeting to reconsider, delay, or prevent implementation of a proposed pedestrian or bicycle safety project after that project has passed 90% design, as specified. After or upon the award of a contract for, or when county or city staff, as applicable, are directed to begin, the construction of a pedestrian or bicycle safety project, the bill would prohibit the city or county from terminating the project unless the city or county makes at least one specified finding at a public meeting. If a city or county establishes a process for residents of the city or county to submit a petition to request the installation of a traffic-calming measure, the bill would prohibit the city or county from requiring the petition to contain the signatures of more than a majority of the total number of persons whose residences are located, in whole or in part, within 1,000 feet of the proposed traffic-calming measure, as specified. To the extent that the bill increases the duties of local officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law, the Pedestrian Mall Law of 1960, authorizes the legislative body of a city or county to establish a pedestrian mall, as defined, and prohibit vehicular traffic on the mall, upon adoption of an ordinance establishing the mall. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA, until January 1, 2040, exempts from its requirements certain transportation-related projects, including, among others, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, as specified. CEQA requires, except as provided, those exempted projects to be carried out by a local agency and meet certain requirements, including certain labor requirements. This bill would exempt from the requirements of CEQA the establishment or expansion of a pedestrian mall and would require those projects to comply with the above-described requirements applicable to those exempted CEQA projects. (3) The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Who sponsors CA AB 1976?
Wicks is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1976.
Description
(1) Existing law grants the legislative body of a city certain powers with respect to city streets and highways, including the power to construct and maintain those streets and highways. Existing law grants the board of supervisors of a county general supervision, management, and control of county highways and authorizes the board of supervisors to lay out, construct, improve, and maintain county highways. This bill would prohibit a city or county from holding a community input meeting to reconsider, delay, or prevent implementation of a proposed pedestrian or bicycle safety project after that project has passed 90% design, as specified. After or upon the award of a contract for, or when county or city staff, as applicable, are directed to begin, the construction of a pedestrian or bicycle safety project, the bill would prohibit the city or county from terminating the project unless the city or county makes at least one specified finding at a public meeting. If a city or county establishes a process for residents of the city or county to submit a petition to request the installation of a traffic-calming measure, the bill would prohibit the city or county from requiring the petition to contain the signatures of more than a majority of the total number of persons whose residences are located, in whole or in part, within 1,000 feet of the proposed traffic-calming measure, as specified. To the extent that the bill increases the duties of local officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law, the Pedestrian Mall Law of 1960, authorizes the legislative body of a city or county to establish a pedestrian mall, as defined, and prohibit vehicular traffic on the mall, upon adoption of an ordinance establishing the mall. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA, until January 1, 2040, exempts from its requirements certain transportation-related projects, including, among others, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, as specified. CEQA requires, except as provided, those exempted projects to be carried out by a local agency and meet certain requirements, including certain labor requirements. This bill would exempt from the requirements of CEQA the establishment or expansion of a pedestrian mall and would require those projects to comply with the above-described requirements applicable to those exempted CEQA projects. (3) The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
- Introduced
- 2026-03-19
- Latest action
- 2026-09-27 — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 565, Statutes of 2026.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Wicksauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-09-27
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 565, Statutes of 2026.
became-law
2026-09-27
Approved by the Governor.
executive-signature
2026-09-14
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 1:30 p.m.
executive-receipt
2026-08-31
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
2026-08-31
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling.
2026-08-31
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 53. Noes 19.).
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-08-31
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 53. Noes 19. Page 7047.).
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-08-30
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 29. Noes 10.).
2026-08-24
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
2026-08-21
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-08-04
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-08-03
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2
2026-07-02
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2026-06-24
Withdrawn from committee.
withdrawal
2026-06-24
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
referral-committee
2026-06-23
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2026-06-17
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-06-10
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV., TRANS. and E.Q.
referral-committee
2026-06-01
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
reading-1,referral-committee
2026-05-28
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 49. Noes 19. Page 5521.)
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-05-21
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 5242.)
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-05-14
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-05-13
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (May 13).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-04-28
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
referral-committee
2026-04-27
Read second time and amended.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2
2026-04-23
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (April 22).
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee
2026-04-21
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2026-04-13
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
referral-committee
2026-04-13
(Pending re-refer to Com. on L. GOV.)
referral-committee
2026-04-13
Assembly Rule 56 suspended. (Page 4580.)
2026-04-09
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-04-06
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
2026-03-23
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
referral-committee
2026-03-19
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-03-19
Referred to Coms. on TRANS. and L. GOV.
referral-committee
2026-02-14
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
2026-02-13
Read first time. To print.
reading-1
Versions
- 02/13/26 - Introduced — 2026-02-13Compare
- 03/19/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-03-19Compare
- 04/09/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-04-09Compare
- 04/27/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-04-27Compare
- 05/21/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-05-21Compare
- 06/17/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-06-17Compare
- 08/21/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-08-21Compare
- 09/04/26 - Enrolled — 2026-09-04Compare
- 09/27/26 - Chaptered — 2026-09-27Compare
- AB1976Compare
- (document, no version)Compare
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
Votes
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Local Government]
2026-04-20 · pass · 12-4
Member-level votes (16)
- Papan: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Hart: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Lackey: no
- Hoover: no
- Macedo: no
- Davies: no
Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
2026-04-22 · pass · 8-2
Member-level votes (10)
- Carrillo: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Ramos: yes
- Ward: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Ta: no
- Johnson: no
Do pass.
2026-05-13 · pass · 11-4
Member-level votes (15)
- Pacheco: yes
- Krell: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Fong: yes
- Solache: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Ellis: no
- Tangipa: no
- Hoover: no
- Ta: no
AB 1976 Wicks Assembly Third Reading
2026-05-28 · pass · 49-19
Member-level votes (80)
- Bryan: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Soria: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Alvarez: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Bonta: yes
- Valencia: yes
- Berman: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Krell: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Solache: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Ramos: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Haney: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Rivas: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Gipson: yes
- Ward: yes
- Hart: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Patel: yes
- Fong: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Lee: yes
- Papan: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Bennett: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Tangipa: no
- Hoover: no
- DeMaio: no
- Alanis: no
- Wallis: no
- Jeff Gonzalez: no
- Ellis: no
- Macedo: no
- Gallagher: no
- Davies: no
- Ta: no
- Lackey: no
- Dixon: no
- Patterson: no
- Castillo: no
- Chen: no
- Sanchez: no
- Johnson: no
- Hadwick: no
- Flora: other
- Gabriel: other
- Muratsuchi: other
- Arambula: other
- Addis: other
- Celeste Rodriguez: other
- McKinnor: other
- Quirk-Silva: other
- Boerner: other
- Petrie-Norris: other
- Bains: other
- Irwin: other
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Transportation]
2026-06-23 · pass · 5-1
Member-level votes (7)
- Ashby: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Laird: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Seyarto: no
- Choi: other
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
2026-07-01 · pass · 5-2
Member-level votes (7)
- Hurtado: yes
- Gonzalez: yes
- Menjivar: yes
- Blakespear: yes
- Allen: yes
- Dahle: no
- Valladares: no
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-09-30T01:26:33.363335Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1976. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.