Bill Commons

CA AB 1975

in committee

Electrical corporations: distribution grid utilization metric.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA AB 1975 pass?

Not yet. CA AB 1975 is in committee and has not come to a final vote. Latest recorded action (2026-05-14): In committee: Held under submission.

What is CA AB 1975 about?

Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission with regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. This bill would require the commission, on or before December 31, 2027, to develop a methodology for calculating a distribution grid utilization metric, as specified. The bill would require each large electrical corporation, in a manner, frequency, and geographic scope determined by the commission, to submit a publicly available report to the commission with the results of the large electrical corporation's distribution grid utilization metric calculations, as specified. The bill would require the commission to establish and periodically update, as appropriate, a distribution grid utilization standard for each large electrical corporation and to ensure the distribution grid utilization standard encourages, and does not inhibit, electrification. The bill would authorize the commission to direct each large electrical corporation to implement programs, rate designs, or other incentives, or to establish financial performance-based incentives or disincentives correlated with achieving the distribution grid utilization standard, as specified. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the above-described provisions would be part of the act and a violation of a commission action implementing the bill's requirements would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Who sponsors CA AB 1975?

Schultz is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1975.

Description

Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission with regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. This bill would require the commission, on or before December 31, 2027, to develop a methodology for calculating a distribution grid utilization metric, as specified. The bill would require each large electrical corporation, in a manner, frequency, and geographic scope determined by the commission, to submit a publicly available report to the commission with the results of the large electrical corporation's distribution grid utilization metric calculations, as specified. The bill would require the commission to establish and periodically update, as appropriate, a distribution grid utilization standard for each large electrical corporation and to ensure the distribution grid utilization standard encourages, and does not inhibit, electrification. The bill would authorize the commission to direct each large electrical corporation to implement programs, rate designs, or other incentives, or to establish financial performance-based incentives or disincentives correlated with achieving the distribution grid utilization standard, as specified. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the above-described provisions would be part of the act and a violation of a commission action implementing the bill's requirements would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Introduced
2026-03-03
Latest action
2026-05-14 — In committee: Held under submission.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Schultzauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-05-14

    In committee: Held under submission.

  2. 2026-05-14

    Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 5030.)

  3. 2026-05-13

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

    referral-committee

  4. 2026-04-28

    Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    referral-committee

  5. 2026-04-27

    Read second time and amended.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  6. 2026-04-23

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 22).

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee

  7. 2026-03-04

    Re-referred to Com. on U. & E.

    referral-committee

  8. 2026-03-03

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on U. & E. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  9. 2026-03-02

    Referred to Com. on U. & E.

    referral-committee

  10. 2026-02-14

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.

  11. 2026-02-13

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

Versions

  • 02/13/26 - Introduced — 2026-02-13Compare
  • 03/03/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-03-03Compare
  • 04/27/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-04-27Compare
  • AB1975Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-04-22 · pass · 16-0

    Member-level votes (18)
    • Boerner: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Ta: other
    • Wallis: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1975. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.