CA AB 1958
deadCriminal procedure: discrimination.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CA AB 1958 pass?
No. CA AB 1958 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process. Latest recorded action (2026-05-28): Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 33. Noes 22. Page 5545.).
What is CA AB 1958 about?
Existing law prohibits the state from seeking or obtaining a criminal conviction or sentence on the basis of race, ethnicity, or national origin, as specified. Existing law allows a defendant to establish a violation of these provisions under specified circumstances, including when a longer or more severe sentence was imposed on the defendant than was imposed on other similarly situated individuals convicted of the same offense and other specified conditions are met. This bill would instead compare the defendant to similarly situated individuals who have engaged in similar conduct, as specified. The bill would make these provisions apply to disparities in plea negotiating and diversion, among other things. Existing law authorizes a defendant in these cases to file a motion requesting disclosure to the defense of all evidence relevant to a potential violation of these provisions, as specified. This bill would additionally authorize a defendant to request any data that has been previously disclosed pursuant to those provisions in another criminal case, and require the court to grant that request, unless the data has no relevance to the current charges. The bill would also revise and recast definitions for these provisions.
Who sponsors CA AB 1958?
Kalra is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1958.
Description
Existing law prohibits the state from seeking or obtaining a criminal conviction or sentence on the basis of race, ethnicity, or national origin, as specified. Existing law allows a defendant to establish a violation of these provisions under specified circumstances, including when a longer or more severe sentence was imposed on the defendant than was imposed on other similarly situated individuals convicted of the same offense and other specified conditions are met. This bill would instead compare the defendant to similarly situated individuals who have engaged in similar conduct, as specified. The bill would make these provisions apply to disparities in plea negotiating and diversion, among other things. Existing law authorizes a defendant in these cases to file a motion requesting disclosure to the defense of all evidence relevant to a potential violation of these provisions, as specified. This bill would additionally authorize a defendant to request any data that has been previously disclosed pursuant to those provisions in another criminal case, and require the court to grant that request, unless the data has no relevance to the current charges. The bill would also revise and recast definitions for these provisions.
- Introduced
- 2026-03-16
- Latest action
- 2026-05-28 — Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 33. Noes 22. Page 5545.).
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Kalraauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-05-28
Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 33. Noes 22. Page 5545.).
failure,reading-1,reading-3
2026-05-18
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-05-14
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 4.) (May 14).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-04-29
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
referral-committee
2026-04-08
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (April 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2026-03-26
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
referral-committee
2026-03-25
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-03-17
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
referral-committee
2026-03-16
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-03-02
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
referral-committee
2026-02-14
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
2026-02-13
Read first time. To print.
reading-1
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
2026-04-07 · pass · 6-2
Member-level votes (9)
- Schultz: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Haney: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Ramos: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Alanis: no
- Lackey: no
- Nguyen: other
Do pass.
2026-05-14 · pass · 10-4
Member-level votes (15)
- Krell: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Fong: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Solache: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Tangipa: no
- Ta: no
- Dixon: no
- Hoover: no
- Pacheco: other
AB 1958 Kalra Assembly Third Reading
2026-05-28 · fail · 33-22
Member-level votes (80)
- Bryan: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Stefani: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Bonta: yes
- Gabriel: yes
- Berman: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Solache: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Haney: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Rivas: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Ward: yes
- Hart: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Fong: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Lee: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Boerner: yes
- Bennett: yes
- Tangipa: no
- Hoover: no
- DeMaio: no
- Alanis: no
- Flora: no
- Ávila Farías: no
- Wallis: no
- Jeff Gonzalez: no
- Ellis: no
- Ramos: no
- Macedo: no
- Gallagher: no
- Davies: no
- Ta: no
- Lackey: no
- Dixon: no
- Patterson: no
- Castillo: no
- Chen: no
- Sanchez: no
- Johnson: no
- Hadwick: no
- Muratsuchi: other
- Soria: other
- Bauer-Kahan: other
- Celeste Rodriguez: other
- Schiavo: other
- Alvarez: other
- Petrie-Norris: other
- Valencia: other
- Calderon: other
- Krell: other
- Nguyen: other
- Pellerin: other
- Bains: other
- Wilson: other
- Gipson: other
- Addis: other
- Michelle Rodriguez: other
- Patel: other
- Irwin: other
- Papan: other
- Quirk-Silva: other
- Blanca Rubio: other
- Ransom: other
- Carrillo: other
- Pacheco: other
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1958. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.