CA AB 1951
enactedCivil actions: filing fees: refunds.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CA AB 1951 pass?
Yes. CA AB 1951 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-07-16): Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 91, Statutes of 2026.
What is CA AB 1951 about?
Existing law provides that a civil action is commenced by filing a complaint by the court. Existing law provides that if a court clerk accepts for filing a complaint or other first paper, or any subsequent filing, and payment is made in an amount less than the required fee or by check that is later returned without payment, the clerk must notify the party who tendered the check that (1) the check was made out for an amount less than the required filing fee or has been returned without payment, whichever is applicable, (2) an administrative charge has been imposed to reimburse the court for the costs of processing the partial payment or returned check and for providing the specified notice, and (3) the party has 20 days from the date of mailing of the notice to pay the filing fee and administrative charge, except as specified. Existing law requires the clerk to void the filing if the party who tendered the returned check or the check in less than the required filing fee has not paid the full amount of the fee and the administrative charge within the 20-day period described above. Existing law provides that if the clerk performs a service or issues a document for which a fee is required and payment is made by check that is later returned without payment, the court may order further proceedings suspended as to the party for whom the check was tendered, and shall notify the party who tendered the check that proceedings have been suspended until receipt of payment of the required fee and the administrative charge by specified methods, but not by personal check or traveler's check. This bill would additionally apply the provisions described above to filing fees paid by credit card, electronic funds transfer, as defined, or any other means approved by the court. Existing law provides that if an electronic filing is made to the clerk by an electronic filing service provider acting as the agent of the court for purposes of collecting and remitting filing fees, and fees owed to the electronic filing service provider remain unpaid for 5 days after notice to the attorney of record, the court clerk may notify the attorney of record that the attorney of record may be sanctioned for nonpayment of fees. Existing law authorizes the court to sanction the attorney of record if fees to the electronic service provider remain unsatisfied 20 days after notice by the clerk. This bill would, if the fees to the electronic filing service provider remain unsatisfied 20 days after notice by the clerk, require the clerk to instead refund the electronic filing service provider, and to follow the procedures described above, as specified.
Who sponsors CA AB 1951?
Dixon is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1951.
Description
Existing law provides that a civil action is commenced by filing a complaint by the court. Existing law provides that if a court clerk accepts for filing a complaint or other first paper, or any subsequent filing, and payment is made in an amount less than the required fee or by check that is later returned without payment, the clerk must notify the party who tendered the check that (1) the check was made out for an amount less than the required filing fee or has been returned without payment, whichever is applicable, (2) an administrative charge has been imposed to reimburse the court for the costs of processing the partial payment or returned check and for providing the specified notice, and (3) the party has 20 days from the date of mailing of the notice to pay the filing fee and administrative charge, except as specified. Existing law requires the clerk to void the filing if the party who tendered the returned check or the check in less than the required filing fee has not paid the full amount of the fee and the administrative charge within the 20-day period described above. Existing law provides that if the clerk performs a service or issues a document for which a fee is required and payment is made by check that is later returned without payment, the court may order further proceedings suspended as to the party for whom the check was tendered, and shall notify the party who tendered the check that proceedings have been suspended until receipt of payment of the required fee and the administrative charge by specified methods, but not by personal check or traveler's check. This bill would additionally apply the provisions described above to filing fees paid by credit card, electronic funds transfer, as defined, or any other means approved by the court. Existing law provides that if an electronic filing is made to the clerk by an electronic filing service provider acting as the agent of the court for purposes of collecting and remitting filing fees, and fees owed to the electronic filing service provider remain unpaid for 5 days after notice to the attorney of record, the court clerk may notify the attorney of record that the attorney of record may be sanctioned for nonpayment of fees. Existing law authorizes the court to sanction the attorney of record if fees to the electronic service provider remain unsatisfied 20 days after notice by the clerk. This bill would, if the fees to the electronic filing service provider remain unsatisfied 20 days after notice by the clerk, require the clerk to instead refund the electronic filing service provider, and to follow the procedures described above, as specified.
- Introduced
- 2026-03-18
- Latest action
- 2026-07-16 — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 91, Statutes of 2026.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Dixonauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-07-16
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 91, Statutes of 2026.
became-law
2026-07-16
Approved by the Governor.
executive-signature
2026-07-15
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11:15 a.m.
executive-receipt
2026-07-02
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
committee-passage
2026-07-02
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0.).
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-07-02
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 5189.).
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-06-30
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
reading-1,reading-2
2026-06-29
From committee: Be ordered to second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to Consent Calendar.
committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2
2026-06-17
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 16). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2026-05-06
Referred to Com. on JUD.
referral-committee
2026-04-23
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
reading-1,referral-committee
2026-04-23
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 4795.)
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-04-16
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
reading-1,reading-2
2026-04-15
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 15).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-03-23
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
referral-committee
2026-03-19
Read second time and amended.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2
2026-03-18
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (March 17).
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee
2026-03-02
Referred to Com. on JUD.
referral-committee
2026-02-14
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
2026-02-13
Read first time. To print.
reading-1
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Do pass as amended, and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar
2026-03-17 · pass · 12-0
Member-level votes (12)
- Bryan: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Macedo: yes
- Dixon: yes
- Papan: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Sanchez: yes
Do pass. To Consent Calendar.
2026-04-15 · pass · 13-0
Member-level votes (15)
- Dixon: yes
- Fong: yes
- Hoover: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Solache: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Krell: yes
- Tangipa: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Ta: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Pellerin: other
- Muratsuchi: other
AB 1951 Dixon Consent Calendar Second Day
2026-04-23 · pass · 74-0
Member-level votes (80)
- Irwin: yes
- Ellis: yes
- Quirk-Silva: yes
- Ramos: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Gabriel: yes
- Gipson: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Ta: yes
- Rivas: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Bennett: yes
- Davies: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Jeff Gonzalez: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Haney: yes
- Johnson: yes
- Hart: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Petrie-Norris: yes
- Solache: yes
- Hoover: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Krell: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Wallis: yes
- Berman: yes
- Valencia: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Dixon: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Castillo: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Gallagher: yes
- Alvarez: yes
- Sanchez: yes
- Bonta: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Lee: yes
- Chen: yes
- DeMaio: yes
- Flora: yes
- Muratsuchi: yes
- Fong: yes
- Ward: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Papan: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Lackey: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Macedo: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Bains: yes
- Tangipa: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Patel: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Alanis: yes
- Boerner: yes
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Hadwick: other
- Soria: other
- Addis: other
- Wicks: other
- Celeste Rodriguez: other
- Sharp-Collins: other
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar
2026-06-16 · pass · 11-0
Member-level votes (13)
- Wahab: yes
- Allen: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Stern: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Reyes: yes
- Niello: yes
- Valladares: yes
- Laird: yes
- Ashby: other
- Weber Pierson: other
Consent Calendar 2nd
2026-07-02 · pass · 37-0
Member-level votes (40)
- Durazo: yes
- Grove: yes
- Jones: yes
- McNerney: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Limón: yes
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Niello: yes
- Dahle: yes
- Padilla: yes
- Pérez: yes
- Menjivar: yes
- Seyarto: yes
- Cortese: yes
- Allen: yes
- Becker: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Ochoa Bogh: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Choi: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Blakespear: yes
- Strickland: yes
- Laird: yes
- Valladares: yes
- Reyes: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Hurtado: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Gonzalez: yes
- Wahab: yes
- McGuire: yes
- Stern: yes
- Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
- Archuleta: yes
- Alvarado-Gil: other
- Rubio: other
- Richardson: other
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-09-04T05:18:22.541076Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1951. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.