CA AB 1886
enactedWards: probation.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CA AB 1886 pass?
Yes. CA AB 1886 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-09-30): Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 904, Statutes of 2026.
What is CA AB 1886 about?
Existing law subjects a minor between 12 and 17 years of age, inclusive, who violates any federal, state, or local law or ordinance, who persistently or habitually refuses to obey the reasonable and proper orders or directions of the minor's parents, guardian, or custodian, or who is beyond the control of that person, who violates an ordinance establishing a curfew or is truant, and a minor under 12 years of age who is alleged to have committed specified serious offenses to the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which may adjudge the minor to be a ward of the court. Existing law authorizes the court to make any reasonable orders for the care, supervision, custody, conduct, maintenance, and support of the ward, including ordering the ward to be on probation without the supervision of the probation officer or ordering the care, custody, and control of the ward to be under the supervision of the probation officer who may place the ward in specified out-of-home placements. Existing law limits to 12 months from the most recent disposition hearing the period of time a ward may remain on probation, except, among other things, the limit does not apply to a ward ordered under the supervision of the probation officer for placement in specified out-of-home placements and a ward who is transferred or discharged from a secure youth treatment facility. This bill would remove the exclusion of wards that have been ordered to be under the supervision of the probation officer for placement in specified out-of-home placements from the 12-month limitation described above. The bill would authorize the court to extend a period of probation to comply with specified provisions, but would prohibit the court from imposing terms and conditions of probation or any other conditions of performance or compliance on the ward during this period of extended jurisdiction. The bill would specify that these provisions do not apply to a ward who has been committed to a secure youth treatment facility during the term of commitment.
Who sponsors CA AB 1886?
Elhawary is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1886.
Description
Existing law subjects a minor between 12 and 17 years of age, inclusive, who violates any federal, state, or local law or ordinance, who persistently or habitually refuses to obey the reasonable and proper orders or directions of the minor's parents, guardian, or custodian, or who is beyond the control of that person, who violates an ordinance establishing a curfew or is truant, and a minor under 12 years of age who is alleged to have committed specified serious offenses to the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which may adjudge the minor to be a ward of the court. Existing law authorizes the court to make any reasonable orders for the care, supervision, custody, conduct, maintenance, and support of the ward, including ordering the ward to be on probation without the supervision of the probation officer or ordering the care, custody, and control of the ward to be under the supervision of the probation officer who may place the ward in specified out-of-home placements. Existing law limits to 12 months from the most recent disposition hearing the period of time a ward may remain on probation, except, among other things, the limit does not apply to a ward ordered under the supervision of the probation officer for placement in specified out-of-home placements and a ward who is transferred or discharged from a secure youth treatment facility. This bill would remove the exclusion of wards that have been ordered to be under the supervision of the probation officer for placement in specified out-of-home placements from the 12-month limitation described above. The bill would authorize the court to extend a period of probation to comply with specified provisions, but would prohibit the court from imposing terms and conditions of probation or any other conditions of performance or compliance on the ward during this period of extended jurisdiction. The bill would specify that these provisions do not apply to a ward who has been committed to a secure youth treatment facility during the term of commitment.
- Introduced
- 2026-03-16
- Latest action
- 2026-09-30 — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 904, Statutes of 2026.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Elhawaryauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-09-30
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 904, Statutes of 2026.
became-law
2026-09-30
Approved by the Governor.
executive-signature
2026-09-04
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
executive-receipt
2026-08-27
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 43. Noes 20.).
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-08-27
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
2026-08-27
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 43. Noes 20. Page 6687.).
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-08-26
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 24. Noes 11.).
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-08-20
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-08-19
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-07-02
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-07-01
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 30).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-06-16
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-06-10
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
referral-committee
2026-06-01
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
reading-1,referral-committee
2026-05-28
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 46. Noes 21. Page 5540.)
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-04-23
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-04-22
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 21).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-03-17
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
referral-committee
2026-03-16
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-03-16
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
referral-committee
2026-02-13
From printer. May be heard in committee March 15.
2026-02-12
Read first time. To print.
reading-1
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
Votes
Do pass.
2026-04-21 · pass · 5-2
Member-level votes (9)
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Haney: yes
- Alanis: no
- Lackey: no
- Nguyen: other
- Ramos: other
AB 1886 Elhawary Assembly Third Reading
2026-05-28 · pass · 46-21
Member-level votes (80)
- Bryan: yes
- Muratsuchi: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- Stefani: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Alvarez: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Bonta: yes
- Gabriel: yes
- Berman: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Krell: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Solache: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Haney: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Rivas: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Ward: yes
- Addis: yes
- Hart: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Fong: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Lee: yes
- Papan: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Boerner: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Bennett: yes
- Tangipa: no
- Hoover: no
- DeMaio: no
- Alanis: no
- Flora: no
- Wallis: no
- Jeff Gonzalez: no
- Ellis: no
- Bains: no
- Macedo: no
- Gallagher: no
- Davies: no
- Ta: no
- Lackey: no
- Dixon: no
- Patterson: no
- Castillo: no
- Chen: no
- Sanchez: no
- Johnson: no
- Hadwick: no
- Nguyen: other
- Gipson: other
- Soria: other
- Celeste Rodriguez: other
- Petrie-Norris: other
- Quirk-Silva: other
- Blanca Rubio: other
- Ramos: other
- Valencia: other
- Michelle Rodriguez: other
- Patel: other
- Irwin: other
- Pacheco: other
Do pass
2026-06-30 · pass · 5-1
Member-level votes (6)
- Arreguín: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Pérez: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Cortese: yes
- Seyarto: no
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-10-02T06:33:45.129474Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1886. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.