CA AB 1863
deadFire protection districts: fees: 911 telephone calls.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CA AB 1863 pass?
No. CA AB 1863 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process. Latest recorded action (2026-05-28): Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 39. Noes 4. Page 5546.).
What is CA AB 1863 about?
Existing law authorizes a fire protection district board to charge a fee to cover the cost of any service the district provides, as specified. This bill would prohibit a fire protection district board from charging a fee to any member of the public for using a 911 emergency telephone number or for emergency responders arriving at a location or otherwise responding to the use of a 911 emergency telephone number, except as provided.
Who sponsors CA AB 1863?
DeMaio is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1863.
Description
Existing law authorizes a fire protection district board to charge a fee to cover the cost of any service the district provides, as specified. This bill would prohibit a fire protection district board from charging a fee to any member of the public for using a 911 emergency telephone number or for emergency responders arriving at a location or otherwise responding to the use of a 911 emergency telephone number, except as provided.
- Introduced
- 2026-04-07
- Latest action
- 2026-05-28 — Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 39. Noes 4. Page 5546.).
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- DeMaioauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-05-28
Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 39. Noes 4. Page 5546.).
failure,reading-1,reading-3
2026-05-18
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-05-14
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 5030.)
2026-05-14
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 14).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-05-13
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
referral-committee
2026-05-04
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 97.
referral-committee
2026-05-04
(Ayes 55. Noes 19. Page 4895.)
2026-04-28
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-04-27
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2
2026-04-23
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 23).
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage
2026-04-08
Re-referred to Com. on E.M.
referral-committee
2026-04-07
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E.M. Read second time and amended.
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-03-16
Referred to Com. on E.M.
referral-committee
2026-02-12
From printer. May be heard in committee March 14.
2026-02-11
Read first time. To print.
reading-1
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Do pass as amended.
2026-04-23 · pass · 6-0
Member-level votes (7)
- Hadwick: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Ransom: yes
- DeMaio: yes
- Bennett: yes
- Bains: other
Do pass.
2026-05-14 · pass · 15-0
Member-level votes (15)
- Dixon: yes
- Krell: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Tangipa: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Ta: yes
- Fong: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Hoover: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Solache: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Mark González: yes
AB 1863 DeMaio Assembly Third Reading
2026-05-28 · fail · 39-4
Member-level votes (80)
- Tangipa: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Hoover: yes
- Soria: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- DeMaio: yes
- Alanis: yes
- Flora: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Krell: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Solache: yes
- Wallis: yes
- Jeff Gonzalez: yes
- Ellis: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Rivas: yes
- Macedo: yes
- Gallagher: yes
- Davies: yes
- Ta: yes
- Ward: yes
- Lackey: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Dixon: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Irwin: yes
- Castillo: yes
- Patel: yes
- Fong: yes
- Chen: yes
- Sanchez: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Johnson: yes
- Hadwick: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Bonta: no
- Kalra: no
- Ortega: no
- Lee: no
- Muratsuchi: other
- Elhawary: other
- Wicks: other
- Bauer-Kahan: other
- Celeste Rodriguez: other
- Stefani: other
- McKinnor: other
- Alvarez: other
- Zbur: other
- Petrie-Norris: other
- Gabriel: other
- Berman: other
- Valencia: other
- Caloza: other
- Pellerin: other
- Ramos: other
- Connolly: other
- Haney: other
- Jackson: other
- Bains: other
- Rogers: other
- Wilson: other
- Schultz: other
- Mark González: other
- Gipson: other
- Addis: other
- Hart: other
- Harabedian: other
- Aguiar-Curry: other
- Garcia: other
- Papan: other
- Quirk-Silva: other
- Blanca Rubio: other
- Boerner: other
- Sharp-Collins: other
- Carrillo: other
- Bennett: other
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1863. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.