CA AB 1850
in committeeReal estate: wholesaling.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CA AB 1850 pass?
Not yet. CA AB 1850 is in committee and has not come to a final vote. Latest recorded action (2026-05-14): In committee: Held under submission.
What is CA AB 1850 about?
Existing law, the Real Estate Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of real estate brokers and salespersons by the Real Estate Commissioner, the chief officer of the Department of Real Estate within the Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency. Existing law makes it unlawful for any person to engage in the business of, act in the capacity of, advertise as, or assume to act as a real estate broker or a real estate salesperson within this state without first obtaining a real estate license from the Department of Real Estate. Existing law defines a real estate broker for these purposes as a person who, for compensation or in expectation of a compensation, regardless of the form or time of payment, does or negotiates to, among other things, sell or offer to sell, buy or offer to buy, solicit prospective sellers or buyers of, solicit or obtain listings of, or negotiate the purchase, sale, or exchange of real property or a business opportunity for another or others. A willful violation of the Real Estate Law is a crime. This bill would expand the definition of a real estate broker under the Real Estate Law to include a person who, for compensation or in expectation of a compensation, regardless of the form or time of payment, negotiates the sales contract. The bill would also prohibit a person from engaging in wholesaling unless they hold a valid real estate license, as specified, and would define wholesaling as entering into or offering to enter into a contract or option to purchase real property on behalf of another person and selling, assigning, or marketing that contract or option to them for compensation or profit. The bill would require a wholesaler to clearly disclose in writing to any property owner with whom they contract that they will not take title to the property, as specified. The bill would require an advertisement or offer to sell or assign a contract or option under these provisions to clearly disclose in writing that the person making the offer does not hold legal title to the property. The bill would deem the failure to provide the above-described disclosure as substantial misrepresentation and would make the failure to provide this disclosure subject to disciplinary action, as specified. By expanding the application of the real estate professional licensing laws, the willful violation of which is a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors CA AB 1850?
Irwin is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1850.
Description
Existing law, the Real Estate Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of real estate brokers and salespersons by the Real Estate Commissioner, the chief officer of the Department of Real Estate within the Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency. Existing law makes it unlawful for any person to engage in the business of, act in the capacity of, advertise as, or assume to act as a real estate broker or a real estate salesperson within this state without first obtaining a real estate license from the Department of Real Estate. Existing law defines a real estate broker for these purposes as a person who, for compensation or in expectation of a compensation, regardless of the form or time of payment, does or negotiates to, among other things, sell or offer to sell, buy or offer to buy, solicit prospective sellers or buyers of, solicit or obtain listings of, or negotiate the purchase, sale, or exchange of real property or a business opportunity for another or others. A willful violation of the Real Estate Law is a crime. This bill would expand the definition of a real estate broker under the Real Estate Law to include a person who, for compensation or in expectation of a compensation, regardless of the form or time of payment, negotiates the sales contract. The bill would also prohibit a person from engaging in wholesaling unless they hold a valid real estate license, as specified, and would define wholesaling as entering into or offering to enter into a contract or option to purchase real property on behalf of another person and selling, assigning, or marketing that contract or option to them for compensation or profit. The bill would require a wholesaler to clearly disclose in writing to any property owner with whom they contract that they will not take title to the property, as specified. The bill would require an advertisement or offer to sell or assign a contract or option under these provisions to clearly disclose in writing that the person making the offer does not hold legal title to the property. The bill would deem the failure to provide the above-described disclosure as substantial misrepresentation and would make the failure to provide this disclosure subject to disciplinary action, as specified. By expanding the application of the real estate professional licensing laws, the willful violation of which is a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Introduced
- 2026-04-14
- Latest action
- 2026-05-14 — In committee: Held under submission.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Irwinauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-05-14
In committee: Held under submission.
2026-05-06
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
referral-committee
2026-04-16
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
referral-committee
2026-04-16
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
referral-committee
2026-04-15
Read second time and amended.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2
2026-04-14
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) (April 14).
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee
2026-03-16
Referred to Coms. on B. & P. and JUD.
referral-committee
2026-02-12
From printer. May be heard in committee March 14.
2026-02-11
Read first time. To print.
reading-1
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary]
2026-04-14 · pass · 19-0
Member-level votes (19)
- Jackson: yes
- Hadwick: yes
- Chen: yes
- Haney: yes
- Berman: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Addis: yes
- Macedo: yes
- Alanis: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Johnson: yes
- Bains: yes
- Irwin: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Hart: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1850. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.