Bill Commons

CA AB 1790

in committee

Corporations Tax Law: water's-edge election: global intangible low-taxed income.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA AB 1790 pass?

Not yet. CA AB 1790 is in committee and has not come to a final vote. Latest recorded action (2026-05-14): In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

What is CA AB 1790 about?

The Corporation Tax Law imposes on every corporation doing business in the state, as defined, a tax according to or measured by net income and, in the case of a corporation with income derived from or attributable to sources both within and without this state, apportions the income between this state and other states and foreign countries in accordance with a single sales formula based on the sales within and without this state, except that in the case of an apportioning trade or business that derives more than 50% of its gross business receipts from conducting one or more qualified business activities, as defined, business income is apportioned in accordance with a specified 3-factor formula. Existing federal law, for purposes of determining a taxpayer's gross income for federal income tax purposes, requires that a person who is a United States shareholder of any controlled foreign corporation, as defined, to include in their gross income the net CFC tested income, as provided. The Corporation Tax Law, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2003, for purposes of determining income derived from or attributable to sources within this state, allows corporations to make a statutory election as to whether their income is determined on a "water's-edge" basis or on a worldwide unitary basis. Under existing law, the election to report income on a water's-edge basis remains in effect until terminated, and provides conditions for the termination of the election. This bill, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2026, would require a taxpayer that files on a water's-edge basis to account for net CFC tested income within the water's-edge group, as provided. The bill would require a taxpayer that files on a water's-edge basis to include all income and apportionment factors of any corporation, other than a bank, whose sales factor, instead of the average of 3 factors, in the United States is at least 20%. The bill would also terminate all water's-edge elections for the first taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2028, and would not allow a taxpayer to make a water's-edge election, or file on a water's-edge basis, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2028. The bill would authorize any taxpayer that has made a water's-edge election to terminate that election without the consent of the Franchise Tax Board for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2026, and before January 1, 2028. This bill would include a change in state statute that would result in a taxpayer paying a higher tax within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 23 of the membership of each house of the Legislature. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Who sponsors CA AB 1790?

Connolly is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1790, joined by 18 cosponsors.

Description

The Corporation Tax Law imposes on every corporation doing business in the state, as defined, a tax according to or measured by net income and, in the case of a corporation with income derived from or attributable to sources both within and without this state, apportions the income between this state and other states and foreign countries in accordance with a single sales formula based on the sales within and without this state, except that in the case of an apportioning trade or business that derives more than 50% of its gross business receipts from conducting one or more qualified business activities, as defined, business income is apportioned in accordance with a specified 3-factor formula. Existing federal law, for purposes of determining a taxpayer's gross income for federal income tax purposes, requires that a person who is a United States shareholder of any controlled foreign corporation, as defined, to include in their gross income the net CFC tested income, as provided. The Corporation Tax Law, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2003, for purposes of determining income derived from or attributable to sources within this state, allows corporations to make a statutory election as to whether their income is determined on a "water's-edge" basis or on a worldwide unitary basis. Under existing law, the election to report income on a water's-edge basis remains in effect until terminated, and provides conditions for the termination of the election. This bill, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2026, would require a taxpayer that files on a water's-edge basis to account for net CFC tested income within the water's-edge group, as provided. The bill would require a taxpayer that files on a water's-edge basis to include all income and apportionment factors of any corporation, other than a bank, whose sales factor, instead of the average of 3 factors, in the United States is at least 20%. The bill would also terminate all water's-edge elections for the first taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2028, and would not allow a taxpayer to make a water's-edge election, or file on a water's-edge basis, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2028. The bill would authorize any taxpayer that has made a water's-edge election to terminate that election without the consent of the Franchise Tax Board for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2026, and before January 1, 2028. This bill would include a change in state statute that would result in a taxpayer paying a higher tax within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 23 of the membership of each house of the Legislature. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Introduced
2026-04-28
Latest action
2026-05-14 — In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Connollyauthor
  • Elhawaryauthor
  • Leeauthor
  • Bontaprincipal coauthor
  • : Rogerscoauthor
  • Addiscoauthor
  • Bryancoauthor
  • Garciacoauthor
  • Mark Gonzálezcoauthor
  • Haneycoauthor
  • Harabediancoauthor
  • Jacksoncoauthor
  • Kalracoauthor
  • McKinnorcoauthor
  • Ortegacoauthor
  • Pellerincoauthor
  • Schultzcoauthor
  • Zburcoauthor
  • Gonzalezcoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-05-14

    In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  2. 2026-05-14

    Coauthors revised.

  3. 2026-05-14

    Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 5030.)

  4. 2026-05-13

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

    referral-committee

  5. 2026-04-30

    Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    referral-committee

  6. 2026-04-29

    Read second time and amended.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  7. 2026-04-28

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 27).

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee

  8. 2026-04-27

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to REV. & TAX. suspense file.

    referral-committee

  9. 2026-02-23

    Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.

    referral-committee

  10. 2026-02-11

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.

  11. 2026-02-10

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-04-27 · pass · 4-2

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • DeMaio: no
    • Sanchez: no
    • Michelle Rodriguez: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1790. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.