Bill Commons

CA AB 1788

introduced

Political Reform Act of 1974: travel expenditures.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA AB 1788 pass?

Not yet. CA AB 1788 has been introduced but has not advanced to a vote. Latest recorded action (2026-05-28): Ordered to inactive file at the request of Assembly Member Boerner.

What is CA AB 1788 about?

Existing law, the Political Reform Act of 1974, requires a nonprofit organization that regularly organizes and hosts travel for elected officials and that makes payments, advances, or reimbursements for their travel that total more than $10,000 per year, or more than $5,000 per year for a single official, to disclose the names of donors to the organization who donated at least $1,000 and accompanied the official on their travel during the preceding year. This bill would additionally require the organization to disclose each payment for travel by the elected state or local official and the name of the person for whom the payment for travel was made. The bill would require the nonprofit organization to maintain detailed accounts, records, bills, and receipts necessary to prepare the disclosures, and to retain these items for at least 5 years. A violation of the Political Reform Act of 1974 is a misdemeanor. By expanding the category of nonprofit organizations subject to the act, and by expanding their disclosure requirements, this bill would expand the scope of a crime and therefore create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house of the Legislature and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act.

Who sponsors CA AB 1788?

Boerner is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1788.

Description

Existing law, the Political Reform Act of 1974, requires a nonprofit organization that regularly organizes and hosts travel for elected officials and that makes payments, advances, or reimbursements for their travel that total more than $10,000 per year, or more than $5,000 per year for a single official, to disclose the names of donors to the organization who donated at least $1,000 and accompanied the official on their travel during the preceding year. This bill would additionally require the organization to disclose each payment for travel by the elected state or local official and the name of the person for whom the payment for travel was made. The bill would require the nonprofit organization to maintain detailed accounts, records, bills, and receipts necessary to prepare the disclosures, and to retain these items for at least 5 years. A violation of the Political Reform Act of 1974 is a misdemeanor. By expanding the category of nonprofit organizations subject to the act, and by expanding their disclosure requirements, this bill would expand the scope of a crime and therefore create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house of the Legislature and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act.

Introduced
2026-03-25
Latest action
2026-05-28 — Ordered to inactive file at the request of Assembly Member Boerner.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Boernerauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-05-28

    Ordered to inactive file at the request of Assembly Member Boerner.

  2. 2026-05-19

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  3. 2026-05-18

    Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  4. 2026-05-14

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (May 14).

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage

  5. 2026-04-15

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

    referral-committee

  6. 2026-04-06

    Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    referral-committee

  7. 2026-03-26

    Read second time and amended.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  8. 2026-03-25

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 25).

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee

  9. 2026-02-23

    Referred to Com. on ELECTIONS.

    referral-committee

  10. 2026-02-11

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.

  11. 2026-02-10

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

Versions

  • 02/10/26 - Introduced — 2026-02-10Compare
  • 03/26/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-03-26Compare
  • 05/18/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-05-18Compare
  • AB1788Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-03-25 · pass · 8-0

    Member-level votes (8)
    • Solache: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Johnson: yes
    • Gallagher: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Berman: yes
  • Do pass as amended.

    2026-05-14 · pass · 11-0

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Krell: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Tangipa: other
    • Ta: other
    • Dixon: other
    • Hoover: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1788. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.