Bill Commons

CA AB 1786

enacted

Public contracts: best value construction contracting for counties, cities, and the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA AB 1786 pass?

Yes. CA AB 1786 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-09-15): Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 202, Statutes of 2026.

What is CA AB 1786 about?

Existing law establishes a program to allow counties to select a bidder on the basis of best value, as defined, for construction projects in excess of $1,000,000. Existing law also authorizes counties to use a best value construction contracting method to award individual annual contracts, not to exceed $3,000,000, for repair, remodeling, or other repetitive work to be done according to unit prices, as specified. Existing law establishes procedures and criteria for the selection of a best value contractor and requires that bidders verify specified information under oath. Existing law requires the board of supervisors of a participating county to submit a report that contains specified information about the projects awarded using the best value procedures described above to the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee before March 1, 2029. Existing law repeals the program provisions on January 1, 2030. This bill would, instead, authorize a county, city, or the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments to select a bidder on the basis of best value, as described above, for construction projects in excess of $500,000, would make various conforming changes to the above-described provisions, and would extend the operation of those provisions until January 1, 2032. With regard to the above-specified reporting requirement, the bill would, instead, require the governing body of a participating county, city, or the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments to submit the report, as specified, to the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee before March 1, 2031. The bill would expand the crime of perjury by extending the operation of the program and expanding the program to cities and the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the San Gabriel Valley.

Who sponsors CA AB 1786?

Harabedian is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1786.

Description

Existing law establishes a program to allow counties to select a bidder on the basis of best value, as defined, for construction projects in excess of $1,000,000. Existing law also authorizes counties to use a best value construction contracting method to award individual annual contracts, not to exceed $3,000,000, for repair, remodeling, or other repetitive work to be done according to unit prices, as specified. Existing law establishes procedures and criteria for the selection of a best value contractor and requires that bidders verify specified information under oath. Existing law requires the board of supervisors of a participating county to submit a report that contains specified information about the projects awarded using the best value procedures described above to the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee before March 1, 2029. Existing law repeals the program provisions on January 1, 2030. This bill would, instead, authorize a county, city, or the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments to select a bidder on the basis of best value, as described above, for construction projects in excess of $500,000, would make various conforming changes to the above-described provisions, and would extend the operation of those provisions until January 1, 2032. With regard to the above-specified reporting requirement, the bill would, instead, require the governing body of a participating county, city, or the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments to submit the report, as specified, to the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee before March 1, 2031. The bill would expand the crime of perjury by extending the operation of the program and expanding the program to cities and the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the San Gabriel Valley.

Introduced
2026-03-12
Latest action
2026-09-15 — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 202, Statutes of 2026.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Harabedianauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-09-15

    Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 202, Statutes of 2026.

    became-law

  2. 2026-09-15

    Approved by the Governor.

    executive-signature

  3. 2026-09-14

    Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 202, Statutes of 2026.

    became-law

  4. 2026-09-14

    Approved by the Governor.

    executive-signature

  5. 2026-08-27

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

    executive-receipt

  6. 2026-08-20

    Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  7. 2026-08-20

    Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0.).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  8. 2026-08-20

    Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 6318.).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  9. 2026-08-19

    In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  10. 2026-08-19

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0.).

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  11. 2026-08-19

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 5545.).

  12. 2026-06-30

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  13. 2026-06-29

    From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

    committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  14. 2026-06-18

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  15. 2026-06-17

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 17).

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee

  16. 2026-05-20

    Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

    referral-committee

  17. 2026-05-12

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

    reading-1,referral-committee

  18. 2026-05-11

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 72. Noes 0. Page 5003.)

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  19. 2026-05-07

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  20. 2026-05-06

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (May 6).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  21. 2026-04-23

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  22. 2026-04-06

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  23. 2026-03-16

    Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

    referral-committee

  24. 2026-03-12

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  25. 2026-02-23

    Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

    referral-committee

  26. 2026-02-11

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.

  27. 2026-02-10

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

Versions

  • 02/10/26 - Introduced — 2026-02-10Compare
  • 03/12/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-03-12Compare
  • 06/18/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-06-18Compare
  • 08/24/26 - Enrolled — 2026-08-24Compare
  • 09/14/26 - Chaptered — 2026-09-14Compare
  • AB1786Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-04-22 · pass · 10-0

    Member-level votes (10)
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Johnson: yes
  • Do pass.

    2026-05-06 · pass · 14-0

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Arambula: other
  • AB 1786 Harabedian Assembly Third Reading

    2026-05-11 · pass · 72-0

    Member-level votes (80)
    • Jackson: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Flora: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Johnson: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Ellis: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • DeMaio: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Castillo: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Solache: other
    • Lowenthal: other
    • Gallagher: other
    • Michelle Rodriguez: other
    • Soria: other
    • Celeste Rodriguez: other
    • Quirk-Silva: other
    • Arambula: other
  • Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-06-17 · pass · 6-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Ashby: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-10-06T12:31:23.902448Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1786. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.