CA AB 1782
deadIncarcerated persons: mental health evaluations.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower
Description
Existing law requires that, as a condition of parole, a prisoner who has a severe mental health disorder be treated by the State Department of State Hospitals if the prisoner meets certain requirements, including, among others, that the severe mental health disorder was one of the causes of, or was an aggravating factor in, the commission of a specified crime for which the prisoner was sentenced to prison, and that prior to release on parole, the prisoner has been evaluated, as specified, and the chief psychiatrist of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation has certified that the prisoner has a severe mental health disorder, that the disorder is not in remission or cannot be kept in remission without treatment, that the severe mental health disorder was one of the causes or was an aggravating factor in the prisoner's criminal behavior, that the prisoner has been in treatment for the severe mental health disorder for 90 days or more within the year prior to the prisoner's parole release day, and that by reason of the prisoner's severe mental health disorder, the prisoner represents a substantial danger of physical harm to others. This bill would instead require the chief psychiatrist of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to certify that the prisoner meets three of the following criteria: a severe mental health disorder, the disorder is not in remission or cannot be kept in remission without treatment, the severe mental health disorder was one of the causes or was an aggravating factor in the prisoner's criminal behavior, the prisoner has been in treatment for the severe mental health disorder for 90 days or more within the year prior to the prisoner's parole release day, and by reason of the prisoner's severe mental health disorder, the prisoner represents a substantial danger of physical harm to others. The bill would include sexual harassment and battery under physical harm.
- Introduced
- —
- Status date
- —
- Latest action
- 2026-04-20 — From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Sponsors
- DeMaioauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2026-02-09
Read first time. To print.
reading-1
2026-02-10
From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.
2026-02-23
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
referral-committee
2026-03-17
In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage.
committee-passage-unfavorable
2026-04-20
From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
committee-passage,failure
Versions
Documents
Document data is temporarily unavailable.
The Bill Commons API could not be reached. Please try again shortly.
Votes
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
2026-03-17 · fail · 2-5
Member-level votes (9)
- Alanis: yes
- Lackey: yes
- Harabedian: no
- Sharp-Collins: no
- Schultz: no
- Haney: no
- Ramos: no
- Mark González: other
- Nguyen: other
Related bills
Related-bill data is temporarily unavailable.
The Bill Commons API could not be reached. Please try again shortly.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1782. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.