Bill Commons

CA AB 1747

dead

Crimes involving vehicles.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA AB 1747 pass?

No. CA AB 1747 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process. Latest recorded action (2026-04-27): From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

What is CA AB 1747 about?

Existing law defines vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated as the unlawful killing of a human being without malice aforethought, in the driving of a vehicle while intoxicated and the killing was either the proximate result of the commission of an unlawful act, not amounting to a felony, but without gross negligence, or the proximate result of the commission of a lawful act that might produce death, in an unlawful manner, but without gross negligence. Under existing law, a violation of this provision is punishable as a misdemeanor or felony. This bill would make a violation of the above provision punishable only as a felony. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Who sponsors CA AB 1747?

Sanchez is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1747.

Description

Existing law defines vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated as the unlawful killing of a human being without malice aforethought, in the driving of a vehicle while intoxicated and the killing was either the proximate result of the commission of an unlawful act, not amounting to a felony, but without gross negligence, or the proximate result of the commission of a lawful act that might produce death, in an unlawful manner, but without gross negligence. Under existing law, a violation of this provision is punishable as a misdemeanor or felony. This bill would make a violation of the above provision punishable only as a felony. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Introduced
—
Latest action
2026-04-27 — From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Sanchezauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-04-27

    From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

    committee-passage,failure

  2. 2026-03-24

    In committee: Set, second hearing. Failed passage.

    committee-passage-unfavorable

  3. 2026-03-09

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  4. 2026-02-23

    Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

    referral-committee

  5. 2026-02-10

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.

  6. 2026-02-09

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-03-24 · fail · 2-3

    Member-level votes (9)
    • Lackey: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Schultz: no
    • Harabedian: no
    • Sharp-Collins: no
    • Haney: other
    • Mark González: other
    • Ramos: other
    • Nguyen: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1747. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.