CA AB 1675

Status unknown

Corporation Tax Law: tax expenditures: No Tax Breaks for ICE Contractors Act of 2026.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA AB 1675 pass?

The current status of CA AB 1675 is not known from the official record. Latest recorded action (2026-06-24): In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

What is CA AB 1675 about?

Existing law, the Corporation Tax Law, imposes taxes based upon gross income, and defines "gross income" as all income from whatever source derived, unless specifically excluded. Existing law allows various credits against the taxes imposed by that law. The Corporation Tax Law conforms to federal law in its treatment of certain exclusions and credits. Existing law provides for certain programs for free legal services for indigent persons. This bill would, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, and before January 1, 2032, enact the No Tax Breaks for ICE Contractors Act of 2026, which would deny all tax credits otherwise available under the Corporation Tax Law to any taxpayer that contracts with United States Department of Homeland Security, except as provided. The bill would establish the California Immigrant Resilience Fund in the State Treasury. The bill would require the Franchise Tax Board, in consultation with the Department of Finance, to estimate the amount of additional revenue resulting from the provisions of the bill, notify the Controller of that amount, and require the Controller to transfer that amount to the fund. The bill would make moneys in the fund available to provide immigration-related services, including removal defense, as provided, upon appropriation by the Legislature. This bill would include a change in state statute that would result in a taxpayer paying a higher tax within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 23 of the membership of each house of the Legislature. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Who sponsors CA AB 1675?

Lee is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1675, joined by 20 cosponsors.

Description

Introduced: 2026-03-23
Latest action: 2026-06-24 — In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
Bill type: bill
Last updated: —

Subjects

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

2026-06-24
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
2026-06-16
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-06-10
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
referral-committee
2026-05-28
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
reading-1,referral-committee
2026-05-27
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 54. Noes 20.)
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-05-27
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 54. Noes 20. Page 5487.)
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-05-18
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-05-14
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (May 14).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-05-14
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 5030.)
2026-05-13
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
referral-committee
2026-04-30
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
referral-committee
2026-04-29
Read second time and amended.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2
2026-04-28
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 27).
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee
2026-04-20
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to REV. & TAX. suspense file.
referral-committee
2026-03-24
Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
referral-committee
2026-03-23
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on REV. & TAX. Read second time and amended.
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-03-23
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
referral-committee
2026-02-03
From printer. May be heard in committee March 5.
2026-02-02
Read first time. To print.
reading-1

Versions

02/02/26 - Introduced — 2026-02-02Compare
03/23/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-03-23Compare
04/29/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-04-29Compare
06/16/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-06-16Compare
AB1675Compare
(document, no version)Compare

Documents

application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
text/html
application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
application/pdf(no extracted text yet)

Votes

Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
2026-04-27 · pass · 5-2
Member-level votes (7)
- Carrillo: yes
- Gipson: yes
- Quirk-Silva: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- DeMaio: no
- Sanchez: no
Do pass.
2026-05-14 · pass · 11-4
Member-level votes (15)
- Krell: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Fong: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Solache: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Tangipa: no
- Ta: no
- Dixon: no
- Hoover: no
AB 1675 Lee Assembly Third Reading
2026-05-28 · pass · 54-20
Member-level votes (80)
- Bennett: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Rivas: yes
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Papan: yes
- Fong: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Hart: yes
- Ramos: yes
- Addis: yes
- Bains: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Boerner: yes
- Ward: yes
- Alvarez: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Soria: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Lee: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Bonta: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Berman: yes
- Valencia: yes
- Gabriel: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- Haney: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Gipson: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Quirk-Silva: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Krell: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Solache: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Irwin: yes
- Muratsuchi: yes
- Macedo: no
- Davies: no
- Patterson: no
- Ta: no
- Johnson: no
- Flora: no
- Chen: no
- Jeff Gonzalez: no
- Tangipa: no
- Ellis: no
- Hoover: no
- Hadwick: no
- Alanis: no
- Sanchez: no
- Lackey: no
- DeMaio: no
- Dixon: no
- Wallis: no
- Castillo: no
- Gallagher: no
- Petrie-Norris: other
- Celeste Rodriguez: other
- Patel: other
- Schiavo: other
- Wilson: other
- Ransom: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1675

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-10-18T10:59:28.238688Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changes Status and relationship changes

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Bulk imports for this session Session dates and activity

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1675. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
Committee referrals are not yet captured.
Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.