CA AB 1589
introducedFirearms: silencers.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CA AB 1589 pass?
Not yet. CA AB 1589 has been introduced but has not advanced to a vote. Latest recorded action (2026-05-27): Ordered to inactive file at the request of Assembly Member Chen.
What is CA AB 1589 about?
Existing law makes it a felony for any person, firm, or corporation to possess a silencer within this state. Existing law exempts specified actions from those provisions, including the possession of silencers by specified peace officers employed by specified law enforcement agencies or by military or naval forces, when on duty and when the use of silencers is authorized by the agency and is within the course and scope of their duties. This bill would further exempt from the prohibition on possessing silencers specified level I reserve peace officers.
Who sponsors CA AB 1589?
Chen is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1589.
Description
Existing law makes it a felony for any person, firm, or corporation to possess a silencer within this state. Existing law exempts specified actions from those provisions, including the possession of silencers by specified peace officers employed by specified law enforcement agencies or by military or naval forces, when on duty and when the use of silencers is authorized by the agency and is within the course and scope of their duties. This bill would further exempt from the prohibition on possessing silencers specified level I reserve peace officers.
- Introduced
- —
- Latest action
- 2026-05-27 — Ordered to inactive file at the request of Assembly Member Chen.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Chenauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-05-27
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Assembly Member Chen.
2026-05-20
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 5166.)
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-03-05
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-03-04
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 3).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-02-02
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
referral-committee
2026-01-16
From printer. May be heard in committee February 15.
2026-01-15
Read first time. To print.
reading-1
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Do pass.
2026-03-03 · pass · 8-0
Member-level votes (9)
- Ramos: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Alanis: yes
- Lackey: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Haney: other
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1589. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.