Bill Commons

CA AB 1585

Status unknown

Wine labeling: "American" or "United States" appellation.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA AB 1585 pass?

The current status of CA AB 1585 is not known from the official record. Latest recorded action (2026-06-23): In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

What is CA AB 1585 about?

The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, administered by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, regulates the sale and distribution of alcoholic beverages and the granting of licenses for the manufacture, distribution, and sale of alcoholic beverages within the state. A violation of the act is generally a misdemeanor. The act imposes specified labeling requirements for containers of alcoholic beverages sold within this state, including prescribed requirements for the use of appellations from specified geographic regions in California. The act generally provides that these labeling requirements do not preclude the use of a label containing a truthful, nonmisleading appellation of origin or geographic description that complies with federal appellation law, except as specified. Existing federal law authorizes the use of the appellation "American" if at least 75% of the wine is derived from fruit or agricultural products grown in the United States, as specified. This bill, notwithstanding the above-described provisions and for wine bottled on or after July 1, 2027, would prohibit the use of the appellation "American" or "United States" on wine produced, bottled, labeled, offered for sale, or sold in California unless 100% of the wine is derived from grapes or agricultural products grown in the United States, as specified. The bill would authorize the department to seize any wine in California that is labeled or packaged in violation of this prohibition and would make related findings and declarations. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Who sponsors CA AB 1585?

Connolly is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1585, joined by 13 cosponsors.

Description

The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, administered by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, regulates the sale and distribution of alcoholic beverages and the granting of licenses for the manufacture, distribution, and sale of alcoholic beverages within the state. A violation of the act is generally a misdemeanor. The act imposes specified labeling requirements for containers of alcoholic beverages sold within this state, including prescribed requirements for the use of appellations from specified geographic regions in California. The act generally provides that these labeling requirements do not preclude the use of a label containing a truthful, nonmisleading appellation of origin or geographic description that complies with federal appellation law, except as specified. Existing federal law authorizes the use of the appellation "American" if at least 75% of the wine is derived from fruit or agricultural products grown in the United States, as specified. This bill, notwithstanding the above-described provisions and for wine bottled on or after July 1, 2027, would prohibit the use of the appellation "American" or "United States" on wine produced, bottled, labeled, offered for sale, or sold in California unless 100% of the wine is derived from grapes or agricultural products grown in the United States, as specified. The bill would authorize the department to seize any wine in California that is labeled or packaged in violation of this prohibition and would make related findings and declarations. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Introduced
2026-04-08
Latest action
2026-06-23 — In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Connollyauthor
  • Ransomauthor
  • Kalracoauthor
  • Macedocoauthor
  • Pellerincoauthor
  • Rogerscoauthor
  • Walliscoauthor
  • Wardcoauthor
  • Wilsoncoauthor
  • Floracoauthor
  • Jeff Gonzalezcoauthor
  • Hadwickcoauthor
  • Hurtadocoauthor
  • McNerneycoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-06-23

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  2. 2026-06-03

    Referred to Com. on G.O.

    referral-committee

  3. 2026-05-27

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

    reading-1,referral-committee

  4. 2026-05-26

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 67. Noes 0.)

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  5. 2026-05-26

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 67. Noes 0. Page 5393.)

  6. 2026-05-18

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  7. 2026-05-14

    Coauthors revised.

  8. 2026-05-14

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 14).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  9. 2026-05-06

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

    referral-committee

  10. 2026-04-23

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  11. 2026-04-09

    Re-referred to Com. on G.O.

    referral-committee

  12. 2026-04-08

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on G.O. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  13. 2026-02-02

    Referred to Com. on G.O.

    referral-committee

  14. 2026-01-15

    From printer. May be heard in committee February 14.

  15. 2026-01-14

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-04-22 · pass · 18-0

    Member-level votes (22)
    • Dixon: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Gallagher: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: other
    • Alvarez: other
    • Pacheco: other
    • Michelle Rodriguez: other
  • Do pass.

    2026-05-14 · pass · 15-0

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Dixon: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Mark González: yes
  • AB 1585 Connolly Assembly Third Reading

    2026-05-27 · pass · 67-0

    Member-level votes (80)
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Ellis: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Flora: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • DeMaio: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Johnson: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Gallagher: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Castillo: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Bains: other
    • Blanca Rubio: other
    • Hart: other
    • Bennett: other
    • Boerner: other
    • Wicks: other
    • Zbur: other
    • Celeste Rodriguez: other
    • Gipson: other
    • Muratsuchi: other
    • Pacheco: other
    • Alanis: other
    • Michelle Rodriguez: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1585. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.