Bill Commons

CA AB 1549

enacted

Alternative domestic violence program.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA AB 1549 pass?

Yes. CA AB 1549 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-06-30): Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 37, Statutes of 2026.

What is CA AB 1549 about?

Existing law requires that the terms of probation granted to a person who has been convicted of domestic violence include, among other things, successful completion of a batterer's program or, if a batterer's program is not available, another appropriate counseling program, as specified. Existing law requires the probation department to design and implement an approval and renewal process for batterer's programs and prescribes the requirements of a batterer's program. Existing law, until July 1, 2026, authorizes the Counties of Napa, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, and Yolo to offer an alternative program for individuals convicted of domestic violence if the program meets specified conditions. This bill would additionally authorize the County of Sacramento to offer an alternative program for individuals convicted of domestic violence. The bill would extend the repeal date of these provisions to July 1, 2030. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Who sponsors CA AB 1549?

Krell is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1549.

Description

Existing law requires that the terms of probation granted to a person who has been convicted of domestic violence include, among other things, successful completion of a batterer's program or, if a batterer's program is not available, another appropriate counseling program, as specified. Existing law requires the probation department to design and implement an approval and renewal process for batterer's programs and prescribes the requirements of a batterer's program. Existing law, until July 1, 2026, authorizes the Counties of Napa, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, and Yolo to offer an alternative program for individuals convicted of domestic violence if the program meets specified conditions. This bill would additionally authorize the County of Sacramento to offer an alternative program for individuals convicted of domestic violence. The bill would extend the repeal date of these provisions to July 1, 2030. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Introduced
—
Latest action
2026-06-30 — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 37, Statutes of 2026.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Krellauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-06-30

    Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 37, Statutes of 2026.

    became-law

  2. 2026-06-30

    Approved by the Governor.

    executive-signature

  3. 2026-06-24

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11:30 a.m.

    executive-receipt

  4. 2026-06-15

    In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.

    committee-passage

  5. 2026-06-15

    Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 4760.).

  6. 2026-06-15

    Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0.).

    amendment-passage,passage,reading-1,reading-3

  7. 2026-06-10

    Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

    reading-1,reading-2

  8. 2026-06-09

    From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 9).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  9. 2026-05-06

    Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

    referral-committee

  10. 2026-03-17

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

    reading-1,referral-committee

  11. 2026-03-16

    Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 4253.).

    amendment-passage,passage,reading-1,reading-3

  12. 2026-03-11

    Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

    reading-1,reading-2

  13. 2026-03-10

    From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (March 10).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  14. 2026-02-02

    Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

    referral-committee

  15. 2026-01-08

    From printer. May be heard in committee February 7.

  16. 2026-01-07

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass. To Consent Calendar.

    2026-03-10 · pass · 9-0

    Member-level votes (9)
    • Schultz: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
  • AB 1549 Krell Consent Calendar Second Day

    2026-03-16 · pass · 75-0

    Member-level votes (80)
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Castillo: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Johnson: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • DeMaio: yes
    • Gallagher: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Ellis: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Flora: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Irwin: other
    • Jeff Gonzalez: other
    • Patterson: other
    • Lee: other
    • Celeste Rodriguez: other
  • Do pass and be ordered to the Consent Calendar

    2026-06-09 · pass · 6-0

    Member-level votes (6)
    • Pérez: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Wiener: yes
  • Consent Calendar 2nd (Urgency Clause)

    2026-06-15 · pass · 38-0

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Jones: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Alvarado-Gil: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Strickland: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Niello: yes
    • Grove: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Ashby: other
    • McNerney: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1549. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.