Bill Commons

CA AB 1088

withdrawn

Public health: kratom.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA AB 1088 pass?

No. CA AB 1088 was withdrawn and is no longer under consideration. Latest recorded action (2026-06-17): In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

What is CA AB 1088 about?

Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, provides for the regulation of various subjects relating to the manufacturing, processing, labeling, advertising, and sale of food, drugs, and cosmetics, under the administration and enforcement of the State Department of Public Health (department) and in accordance with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The act generally requires manufacturers, packers, and holders of processed foods to register with the department. A violation of the act is a crime. This bill would add kratom products, as defined, to the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law. The bill would require a processor, as defined, to register with the department and to annually register each kratom product it manufactures, packages, distributes, or labels, which would include certification by a laboratory specifying that the product meets certain qualifications. The bill would establish labeling and packaging requirements for those products. The bill would prohibit the sale of kratom products to those under 21 years of age and would prohibit the sale or distribution of those products at a premise or on an internet website or application that permits a person under 21 years of age to enter and remain or to complete the purchase of any product. The bill would prohibit the sale or distribution of a kratom product that has a child-attractive flavor, as defined. The bill would authorize the department to deny, suspend, or revoke a registration for actions taken in violation of these provisions. By expanding the scope of a crime, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. This bill would require a purchaser of a kratom product to pay a tax on the purchase for use in this state of a kratom product from a retailer of 15% of the sales price from the sale of a kratom product. The bill would require a retailer to collect the tax from the purchaser at the time of the retail sale. The bill would require all revenues, interest, and penalties, less refunds, collected from the tax described above to be deposited into the Kratom Products Public Health and Safety Fund, a continuously appropriated fund created by the bill, and would require all amounts in the fund to be distributed to the University of California Kern County Medical Education Endowment Fund, the Board of State and Community Corrections, the Primary Care Account, and the Specialty Care Account, among others. By creating a continuously appropriated fund and allocating additional moneys to continuously appropriated funds, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would provide for the administration and collection of this tax pursuant to procedures set forth in the Fee Collection Procedures Law. By expanding the application of the Fee Collection Procedures Law, the violation of which is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Who sponsors CA AB 1088?

Bains is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1088.

Description

Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, provides for the regulation of various subjects relating to the manufacturing, processing, labeling, advertising, and sale of food, drugs, and cosmetics, under the administration and enforcement of the State Department of Public Health (department) and in accordance with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The act generally requires manufacturers, packers, and holders of processed foods to register with the department. A violation of the act is a crime. This bill would add kratom products, as defined, to the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law. The bill would require a processor, as defined, to register with the department and to annually register each kratom product it manufactures, packages, distributes, or labels, which would include certification by a laboratory specifying that the product meets certain qualifications. The bill would establish labeling and packaging requirements for those products. The bill would prohibit the sale of kratom products to those under 21 years of age and would prohibit the sale or distribution of those products at a premise or on an internet website or application that permits a person under 21 years of age to enter and remain or to complete the purchase of any product. The bill would prohibit the sale or distribution of a kratom product that has a child-attractive flavor, as defined. The bill would authorize the department to deny, suspend, or revoke a registration for actions taken in violation of these provisions. By expanding the scope of a crime, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. This bill would require a purchaser of a kratom product to pay a tax on the purchase for use in this state of a kratom product from a retailer of 15% of the sales price from the sale of a kratom product. The bill would require a retailer to collect the tax from the purchaser at the time of the retail sale. The bill would require all revenues, interest, and penalties, less refunds, collected from the tax described above to be deposited into the Kratom Products Public Health and Safety Fund, a continuously appropriated fund created by the bill, and would require all amounts in the fund to be distributed to the University of California Kern County Medical Education Endowment Fund, the Board of State and Community Corrections, the Primary Care Account, and the Specialty Care Account, among others. By creating a continuously appropriated fund and allocating additional moneys to continuously appropriated funds, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would provide for the administration and collection of this tax pursuant to procedures set forth in the Fee Collection Procedures Law. By expanding the application of the Fee Collection Procedures Law, the violation of which is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Introduced
2025-04-10
Latest action
2026-06-17 — In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
Bill type
bill,appropriation
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Bainsauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-06-17

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  2. 2026-06-10

    Re-referred to Coms. on HEALTH and REV. & TAX.

    referral-committee

  3. 2026-06-09

    Withdrawn from committee.

    withdrawal

  4. 2026-06-09

    Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

    referral-committee

  5. 2026-06-09

    In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  6. 2026-06-08

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  7. 2025-06-11

    Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

    referral-committee

  8. 2025-06-03

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

    reading-1,referral-committee

  9. 2025-06-02

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 1876.)

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  10. 2025-05-27

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  11. 2025-05-23

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (May 23).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  12. 2025-05-21

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

    referral-committee

  13. 2025-05-21

    Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 1627.)

  14. 2025-05-14

    In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  15. 2025-04-30

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  16. 2025-04-23

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on E.S & T.M. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on E.S & T.M.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  17. 2025-04-22

    Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

    referral-committee

  18. 2025-04-21

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  19. 2025-04-21

    Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

    referral-committee

  20. 2025-04-10

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  21. 2025-04-03

    In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  22. 2025-03-10

    Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and E.S & T.M.

    referral-committee

  23. 2025-02-21

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  24. 2025-02-20

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

Versions

  • 02/20/25 - Introduced — 2025-02-20Compare
  • 04/10/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-04-10Compare
  • 04/21/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-04-21Compare
  • 06/08/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-06-08Compare
  • AB1088Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials]

    2025-04-22 · pass · 16-0

    Member-level votes (16)
    • Chen: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Flora: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Addis: yes
  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-04-29 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Ellis: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Castillo: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
  • Do pass.

    2025-05-23 · pass · 14-0

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Calderon: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Sanchez: other
  • AB 1088 Bains Assembly Third Reading

    2025-06-02 · pass · 76-0

    Member-level votes (79)
    • Addis: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Gallagher: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • DeMaio: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Castillo: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Flora: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Ellis: other
    • Lackey: other
    • Elhawary: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1088. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.