Bill Commons

CA AB 1049

vetoed

California Food Assistance Program: sponsor deeming rules.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA AB 1049 pass?

No. CA AB 1049 passed the legislature but was vetoed. Latest recorded action (2026-09-18): Vetoed by Governor.

What is CA AB 1049 about?

Existing federal law establishes the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) , known in California as CalFresh, under which supplemental nutrition assistance benefits allocated to the state by the federal government are distributed to eligible individuals by each county. Existing state law establishes, in addition to CalFresh, the California Food Assistance Program (CFAP) to provide nutrition benefits to households that are ineligible for CalFresh benefits solely due to their immigration status, as specified. Existing law sets forth provisions relating to state funding for CFAP. Under existing federal and state law, in determining the eligibility and amount of aid for a person who is not a citizen or national of the United States under certain public social services programs, the income and resources of the person are deemed to include the income and resources of any person who has executed an affidavit of support on behalf of the person and the spouse of that person, with certain exemptions. Existing state law requires that federal deeming rules and exemptions governing SNAP also govern CFAP, with certain exceptions. Under this bill, beginning January 1, 2028, or when the department notifies the Legislature that the Statewide Automated Welfare System can perform the necessary automation to implement these provisions, whichever is later, federal sponsor deeming rules and noncitizen exemptions governing SNAP would instead not apply to CFAP. By creating new duties for counties relating to CFAP eligibility, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Who sponsors CA AB 1049?

Celeste Rodriguez is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1049, joined by 1 cosponsor.

Description

Existing federal law establishes the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) , known in California as CalFresh, under which supplemental nutrition assistance benefits allocated to the state by the federal government are distributed to eligible individuals by each county. Existing state law establishes, in addition to CalFresh, the California Food Assistance Program (CFAP) to provide nutrition benefits to households that are ineligible for CalFresh benefits solely due to their immigration status, as specified. Existing law sets forth provisions relating to state funding for CFAP. Under existing federal and state law, in determining the eligibility and amount of aid for a person who is not a citizen or national of the United States under certain public social services programs, the income and resources of the person are deemed to include the income and resources of any person who has executed an affidavit of support on behalf of the person and the spouse of that person, with certain exemptions. Existing state law requires that federal deeming rules and exemptions governing SNAP also govern CFAP, with certain exceptions. Under this bill, beginning January 1, 2028, or when the department notifies the Legislature that the Statewide Automated Welfare System can perform the necessary automation to implement these provisions, whichever is later, federal sponsor deeming rules and noncitizen exemptions governing SNAP would instead not apply to CFAP. By creating new duties for counties relating to CFAP eligibility, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Introduced
—
Latest action
2026-09-18 — Vetoed by Governor.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Celeste Rodriguezauthor
  • Leecoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-09-18

    Vetoed by Governor.

    executive-veto

  2. 2026-09-04

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

    executive-receipt

  3. 2026-08-27

    In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  4. 2026-08-27

    Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 59. Noes 15.).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  5. 2026-08-27

    Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 59. Noes 15. Page 6694.).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  6. 2026-08-26

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 30. Noes 10.).

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  7. 2026-08-20

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  8. 2026-08-19

    Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  9. 2026-08-13

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 13).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  10. 2026-08-13

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  11. 2026-06-29

    In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.

    referral-committee

  12. 2026-06-16

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  13. 2026-05-28

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  14. 2026-05-06

    Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

    referral-committee

  15. 2026-01-29

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

    reading-1,referral-committee

  16. 2026-01-29

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 54. Noes 15. Page 3867.)

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  17. 2026-01-22

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 3.) (January 22).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  18. 2026-01-22

    Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Page 3806.)

  19. 2026-01-22

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  20. 2025-05-23

    In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  21. 2025-04-23

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.

    referral-committee

  22. 2025-04-09

    Coauthors revised.

  23. 2025-04-09

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  24. 2025-03-10

    Referred to Com. on HUM. S.

    referral-committee

  25. 2025-02-21

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  26. 2025-02-20

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-04-08 · pass · 5-1

    Member-level votes (6)
    • Calderon: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Castillo: no
  • Do pass.

    2026-01-22 · pass · 11-3

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Wicks: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Hoover: no
    • Tangipa: no
    • Dixon: no
    • Ta: other
  • AB 1049 Celeste Rodriguez Assembly Third Reading By JACKSON

    2026-01-29 · pass · 54-15

    Member-level votes (80)
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • DeMaio: no
    • Gallagher: no
    • Lackey: no
    • Macedo: no
    • Chen: no
    • Tangipa: no
    • Dixon: no
    • Hadwick: no
    • Jeff Gonzalez: no
    • Johnson: no
    • Patterson: no
    • Sanchez: no
    • Castillo: no
    • Alanis: no
    • Ellis: no
    • Arambula: other
    • Celeste Rodriguez: other
    • Hoover: other
    • Ransom: other
    • Flora: other
    • Gipson: other
    • Wallis: other
    • Schiavo: other
    • Ta: other
    • Davies: other
    • Valencia: other
  • Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-06-15 · pass · 4-1

    Member-level votes (5)
    • Pérez: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: no
  • Placed on suspense file

    2026-06-29 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Grayson: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-09-21T02:53:48.612860Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1049. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.