Bill text
Compare versions
--- version:File No. 619+++ version:(document, no version)@@ -1,153 +1,4 @@-Senate-SB506 / File No. 619 1--General Assembly File No. 619-February Session, 2026 Senate Bill No. 506--Senate, April 14, 2026--The Committee on Judiciary reported through SEN. WINFIELD-of the 10th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of-the Senate, that the bill ought to pass.-- AN ACT CONCERNING CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR INTENTIONAL-DAMAGE TO CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE.-Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General-Assembly convened:--Section 1. Section 53a -115 of the general statutes is repealed and the 1-following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2026): 2-(a) A person is guilty of criminal mischief in the first degree when: (1) 3-With intent to cause damage to tangible property of another and having 4-no reasonable ground to believe that such person has a right to do so, 5-such person damages tangible property of another in an amount 6-exceeding one thousand five hundred dollars, or (2) with intent to cause 7-(A) (i) damage to tangible property of another and having no reasonable 8-ground to believe that such person has a right to do so, or (ii) an 9-interruption or impairment of service rendered to the public , and 10-[having] (B) with no reasonable ground to believe that such person has 11-a right to do so, such person damages or tampers with tangible property 12-of a utility or mode of public transportation, power or communication, 13-and thereby causes an interruption or impairment of service rendered 14-SB506 File No. 619--SB506 / File No. 619 2--to the public, or (3) with intent to cause damage to any electronic 15-monitoring equipment owned or leased by the state or its agent and 16-required as a condition of probation or conditional discharge pursuant 17-to section 53a-30, as a condition of release pursuant to section 54-64a or 18-as a condition of community release pursuant to section 18 -100c, and 19-having no reasonable ground to believe that such person has a right to 20-do so, such person damages such electronic monitoring equipment and 21-thereby causes an interruption in its ability to function, or (4) with intent 22-to cause (A) damage to tangible property of another and having no 23-reasonable ground to believe that such person has a right to do so, or (B) 24-an interruption or impairment of service rendered to the public and 25-having no reasonable ground to believe that such person has a right to 26-do so, such person damages or tampers with [(A)] (i) any tangible 27-property owned by the state, a municipality or a person for fire alarm or 28-police alarm purposes, [(B)] (ii) any telecommunication system operated 29-by the state police or a municipal police department, [(C)] (iii) any 30-emergency medical or fire service dispatching system, [(D)] (iv) any fire 31-suppression equipment owned by the state, a municipality, a person or 32-a fire district, or [(E)] (v) any fire hydrant or hydrant system owned by 33-the state or a municipality, a person, a fire district or a private water 34-company, or (5) with intent to cause damage to tangible property owned 35-by the state or a municipality that is located on public land and having 36-no reasonable ground to believe that such person has a right to do so, 37-such person damages such tangible property in an amount exceeding 38-one thousand five hundred dollars. 39-(b) Criminal mischief in the first degree is a class D felony. 40-Sec. 2. Section 53a -116 of the general statutes is repealed and the 41-following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2026): 42-(a) A person is guilty of criminal mischief in the second degree when: 43-(1) With intent to cause damage to tangible property of another and 44-having no reasonable ground to believe that such person has a right to 45-do so, such person damages tangible property of another in an amount 46-exceeding two hundred fifty dollars; or (2) with intent to cause (A) 47-SB506 File No. 619--SB506 / File No. 619 3--damage to tangible property of another and having no reasonable 48-ground to believe that such person has a right to do so, or (B) an 49-interruption or impairment of service rendered to the public and having 50-no reasonable ground to believe that such person has a right to do so, 51-such person damages or tampers with tangible property of a public 52-utility or mode of public transportation, power or communication, and 53-thereby causes a risk of interruption or impairment of service rendered 54-to the public; or (3) with intent to cause damage to tangible property 55-owned by the state or a municipality that is located on public land and 56-having no reasonable ground to believe that such person has a right to 57-do so, such person damages such tangible property in an amount 58-exceeding two hundred fifty dollars. 59-(b) Criminal mischief in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor. 60-This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following-sections:--Section 1 October 1, 2026 53a-115-Sec. 2 October 1, 2026 53a-116--JUD Joint Favorable--SB506 File No. 619--SB506 / File No. 619 4--The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of-the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not-represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose. In general,-fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional-knowledge. Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final-products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.--OFA Fiscal Note--State Impact:-Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 27 $ FY 28 $-Correction, Dept.; Judicial Dept.-(Probation)-GF - Potential-Cost-Minimal Minimal-Resources of the General Fund GF - Potential-Revenue Gain-Minimal Minimal-Note: GF=General Fund-Municipal Impact: None-Explanation-The bill expands the offenses of criminal mischief in the first and-second degrees , resulting in a potential cost to the Department of-Correction and the Judicial Department for incarceration or probation-and a potential revenue gain to the General Fund from fines. 1 On-average, the marginal cost to the state for incarcerating an offender for-the year is $3,3002 while the average marginal cost for supervision in the-community is less than $6003 each year for adults and $450 each year for-juveniles.-The Out Years--1 Between FY 22 and FY 25, there were a total of 10,818 offenses recorded and $3,000-in fines collected under CGS §§ 53a-115 and 53a-116.-2 Inmate marginal cost is based on increased consumables (e.g., food, clothing, water,-sewage, living supplies, etc.) This does not include a change in staffing costs or utility-expenses because these expenses would only be realized if a unit or facility op ened.-3 Probation marginal cost is based on services provided by private providers and only-includes costs that increase with each additional participant. This does not include a-cost for additional supervision by a probation officer unless a new offense is-anticipated to result in enough additional offenders to require additional probation-officers.-SB506 File No. 619--SB506 / File No. 619 5--The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would-continue into the future subject to the number of offenses and fines-collected.--SB506 File No. 619--SB506 / File No. 619 6+Researcher: MK Page 1 4/14/26OLR Bill AnalysisSB 506@@ -178,12 +29,12 @@instances where someone intentionally interrupts or impairs theseservices.Specific Services or Systems Damage-SB506 File No. 619--SB506 / File No. 619 7-Under existing law, a person commits 1st degree criminal mischiefby intentionally interrupting or impairing public services by damaging+2026SB-00506-R000619-BA.DOCX++Researcher: MK Page 2 4/14/26+or tampering with any of the following:1. tangible property owned by the state, a municipality, or a personfor fire alarm or police alarm purposes;
Diffs are computed deterministically from extracted bill text and show additions, deletions, and section moves. Scanned-PDF text extracted via OCR is flagged where confidence is low; see methodology.