CO HB 1308
died on adjournmentLot Splitting Approval by Subject Jurisdictions
Colorado · 2026 Regular Session · lower
Description
The bill provides that, on or after December 31, 2027, subject to an administrative approval process, a subject jurisdiction shall approve the a lot split of an original lot into 2 new lots if the following conditions are met: The area of the original lot is 2,000 square feet or greater before the split; The lot split does not create a new lot that is smaller than 1,200 square feet in area;If the 2 new lots are not equal in area, the area of the smaller of the 2 new lots is equal to or greater than 40% 30% of the area of the original lot;The original lot is not subject to any previously recorded was never subject to another lot split;Residential use is allowed on the original lot; It is feasible for both of the new lots to be accessed; for utility easements to serve both new lots; and for both new lots to meet land survey plat and monument records requirements;The original lot is not an exempt lot; andThe original lot is not located within a common interest community that was created on or before December 31, 2027. A subject jurisdiction may establish procedures to review and accept information related to a proposed lot split, including lot information related to:Property ownership;Physical characteristics of the lot, including geology and soils;Proposed new lot lines and new lot areas;Adequacy of water supply, sewer service, and drainage systems to serve the new lots;Adequacy of electric power and natural gas service to serve the new lots;Dedication for schools, parks, streets, and other public areas, or payment of money in lieu of such dedication; andGuarantees of necessary public improvements. A subject jurisdiction:Shall not apply a setback standard that requires a setback from the lot line adjoining 2 new lots created through a lot split if no structure existed on the original lot immediately preceding the lot split; andMay apply a setback standard that requires a setback from the lot line adjoining 2 new lots created through a lot split if a structure existed on the original lot immediately preceding the lot split and if the setback is equal to or less than 5 feet. If an original lot or any structure built on the original lot is subject to an evidence of debt constituting a residential mortgage loan lien , then prior to approving the split of an original a lot split , a subject jurisdiction shall verify that the holder of the evidence of debt constituting a residential mortgage loan (holder) lienholder has received notice of the proposed lot split and has consented to the lot split in writing. The holder lienholder may condition consent to the lot split on the satisfaction of specified conditions. The written consent of the holder must be executed in a form that is eligible for recording in the real property records of the county in which the original lot is located and must include:The notarized signature of the holder lienholder or the agent of the holder lienholder ;The name of the record owner or ground lessee of the original lot;The legal description of the original lot; andThe identities of all parties with an interest in the original lot, as reflected in the real property records. records, including any easements and encumbrances. The written consent of the holder lienholder must be recorded in the office of the county recorder of the county in which the original lot is located. If the holder lienholder does not provide written consent to the lot split, the subject jurisdiction shall not approve the lot split. A lot split that is approved before the written consent of the lienholder has been obtained and recorded is void.(Note: Italicized words indicate new material added to the original summary; dashes through words indicate deletions from the original summary.)(Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
- Introduced
- 2026-03-02
- Status date
- —
- Latest action
- 2026-04-30 — Senate Committee on Local Government & Housing Postpone Indefinitely
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- M. Ballsponsor
- J. Amabilesponsor
- S. Woodrowsponsor
- A. Boeseneckersponsor
- K. Nguyencosponsor
- K. McCormickcosponsor
- R. Stewartcosponsor
- M. Froelichcosponsor
- S. Camachocosponsor
- M. Lindsaycosponsor
- L. Smithcosponsor
- M. Rutinelcosponsor
- J. Phillipscosponsor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2026-03-23
House Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
reading-2
2026-04-30
Senate Committee on Local Government & Housing Postpone Indefinitely
2026-03-27
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Local Government & Housing
introduction
2026-03-24
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
passage,reading-3
2026-03-23
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
2026-03-20
House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
2026-03-17
House Committee on Transportation, Housing & Local Government Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
committee-passage,referral-committee
2026-03-02
Introduced In House - Assigned to Transportation, Housing & Local Government
introduction
Versions
Documents
Votes
Adopt amendment L.003 (Attachment G)
2026-03-17 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (1)
- Elizabeth Velasco: excused
Adopt amendment L.001 (Attachment E)
2026-03-17 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (1)
- Elizabeth Velasco: excused
Refer House Bill 26-1308, as amended, to the Committee of the Whole.
2026-03-17 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (13)
- Larry Don Suckla: no
- Elizabeth Velasco: excused
- Rebekah Stewart: yes
- Andrew Boesenecker: yes
- Max Brooks: no
- Jamie Jackson: yes
- Kenny Nguyen: yes
- Mandy Lindsay: yes
- Amy Paschal: yes
- Chris Richardson: no
- Ron Weinberg: no
- Meg Froelich: yes
- Jacque Phillips: yes
Adopt amendment L.005 (Attachment I)
2026-03-17 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (1)
- Elizabeth Velasco: excused
Adopt amendment L.002 (Attachment F)
2026-03-17 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (1)
- Elizabeth Velasco: excused
Adopt amendment L.004 (Attachment H)
2026-03-17 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (1)
- Elizabeth Velasco: excused
BILL
2026-03-24 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (65)
- Bacon: yes
- Barron: no
- Boesenecker: yes
- Bottoms: no
- Bradfield: no
- Bradley: no
- Brooks: no
- Brown: yes
- Caldwell: no
- Camacho: yes
- Carter: yes
- Clifford: yes
- DeGraaf: no
- Duran: yes
- English: yes
- Espenoza: yes
- Feret: yes
- Flanell: no
- Froelich: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Garcia Sander: no
- Gilchrist: yes
- Goldstein: yes
- Gonzalez R.: no
- Hamrick: no
- Hartsook: no
- Jackson: yes
- Johnson: no
- Joseph: yes
- Keltie: no
- Lieder: yes
- Lindsay: yes
- Luck: no
- Lukens: yes
- Mabrey: yes
- Marshall: yes
- Martinez: yes
- Mauro: yes
- McCormick: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Paschal: yes
- Phillips: yes
- Richardson: no
- Ricks: yes
- Rutinel: yes
- Rydin: yes
- Sirota: yes
- Slaugh: no
- Smith: yes
- Soper: no
- Stewart K.: yes
- Stewart R.: yes
- Story: yes
- Suckla: no
- Taggart: no
- Titone: no
- Valdez: no
- Velasco: yes
- Weinberg: no
- Willford: no
- Winter T.: no
- Woodrow: yes
- Woog: no
- Zokaie: yes
- McCluskie: yes
Postpone House Bill 26-1308 indefinitely.
2026-04-30 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (7)
- Mark Baisley: yes
- Matt Ball: yes
- William Lindstedt: yes
- Larry Liston: yes
- Janice Rich: yes
- Marc Snyder: yes
- Tony Exum: excused
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T03:52:26.466301Z
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CO&identifier=HB 1308. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.