MD HB 969
enactedElectric Vehicle Fuel Sold at Retail - Equipment Requirements, Units of Measure, and Fees
Maryland · 2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did MD HB 969 pass?
Yes. MD HB 969 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-04-28): Approved by the Governor - Chapter 281
What is MD HB 969 about?
MD HB 969 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “Electric Vehicle Fuel Sold at Retail - Equipment Requirements, Units of Measure, and Fees”.
Who sponsors MD HB 969?
Healey, Guyton, Allen are the primary sponsors of MD HB 969.
- Introduced
- —
- Latest action
- 2026-04-28 — Approved by the Governor - Chapter 281
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Sponsors
- Healeyprimary
- Guytonprimary
- Allenprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-04-28
Approved by the Governor - Chapter 281
executive-signature
2026-04-10
Returned Passed
2026-04-09
Third Reading Passed
passage
2026-04-08
Second Reading Passed
2026-04-08
Favorable Adopted
committee-passage-favorable
2026-04-08
Favorable Report by Education, Energy, and the Environment
committee-passage-favorable
2026-03-24
Hearing 4/02 at 1:00 p.m.
2026-03-23
Referred Education, Energy, and the Environment
referral-committee
2026-03-23
Third Reading Passed
passage
2026-03-21
Second Reading Passed with Amendments
2026-03-21
Favorable with Amendments {
committee-passage-favorable
2026-03-20
Favorable with Amendments Report by Environment and Transportation
committee-passage-favorable
2026-02-26
Hearing 2/27 at 1:30 p.m.
2026-02-26
Hearing canceled
2026-02-10
Hearing 2/27 at 1:00 p.m.
2026-02-06
First Reading Environment and Transportation
referral-committee
Versions
- Chapter - Electric Vehicle Fuel Sold at Retail - Equipment Requirements, Units of Measure, and FeesCompare
- Third - Electric Vehicle Fuel Sold at Retail - Equipment Requirements, Units of Measure, and FeesCompare
- First - Electric Vehicle Fuel Sold at Retail - Equipment Requirements, Units of Measure, Sales Price, and FeesCompare
- (document, no version)Compare
Documents
Votes
On Third Reading
2026-03-10 · pass · 112-26
Member-level votes (141)
- Speaker: yes
- Cullison: yes
- Jones, D.: yes
- Qi: yes
- Stonko: yes
- Acevero: yes
- Davis: yes
- Kaiser: yes
- Queen: yes
- Taveras: yes
- Addison: yes
- Ebersole: yes
- Kaufman: yes
- Reilly: yes
- Taylor: yes
- Allen: yes
- Edelson: yes
- Kerr: yes
- Roberson: yes
- Terrasa: yes
- Alston: yes
- Embry: yes
- Kipke: yes
- Roberts: yes
- Toles: yes
- Amprey: yes
- Fair: yes
- Korman: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Turner: yes
- Arentz: yes
- Feldmark: yes
- Lehman: yes
- Rosenberg: yes
- Valderrama: yes
- Arikan: yes
- Fennell: yes
- Lewis: yes
- Ross: yes
- Valentine: yes
- Bagnall: yes
- Foley: yes
- Long, J.: yes
- Ruff: yes
- Vogel: yes
- Barnes: yes
- Forbes: yes
- Lopez: yes
- Ruth: yes
- Watson: yes
- Bartlett: yes
- Fraser-Hidalgo: yes
- Martinez: yes
- Sample-Hughes: yes
- Wells: yes
- Behler: yes
- Guyton: yes
- McCaskill: yes
- Schindler: yes
- White Holland: yes
- Bhandari: yes
- Guzzone: yes
- Mireku-North: yes
- Schmidt: yes
- Wilkins: yes
- Boafo: yes
- Harrison: yes
- Moon: yes
- Shetty: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Boyce: yes
- Healey: yes
- Moreno: yes
- Simmons: yes
- Wims: yes
- Cardin: yes
- Hill: yes
- Morgan, T.: yes
- Simpson: yes
- Wivell: yes
- Chang: yes
- Holmes: yes
- Odom: yes
- Smith: yes
- Wolek: yes
- Charkoudian: yes
- Hornberger: yes
- Palakovich Carr: yes
- Solomon: yes
- Woods: yes
- Clippinger: yes
- Howard: yes
- Pasteur: yes
- Spiegel: yes
- Woorman: yes
- Coley: yes
- Ivey: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Stein: yes
- Wu: yes
- Conaway: yes
- Jacobs: yes
- Phillips: yes
- Stewart: yes
- Young: yes
- Crosby: yes
- Johnson, A.: yes
- Pruski: yes
- Stinnett: yes
- Ziegler: yes
- Crutchfield: yes
- Johnson, S.: yes
- Adams: no
- Ciliberti: no
- Hartman: no
- McComas: no
- Nkongolo: no
- Anderson: no
- Fisher: no
- Hinebaugh: no
- Metzgar: no
- Pippy: no
- Baker: no
- Ghrist: no
- Hutchinson: no
- Miller: no
- Rose: no
- Beauchamp: no
- Grammer: no
- Long, R.: no
- Morgan, M.: no
- Szeliga: no
- Buckel: no
- Griffith: no
- Mangione: no
- Nawrocki: no
- Tomlinson: no
- Chisholm: no
- Bouchat: not voting
- Jones, A.: absent
- Williams: absent
On Third Reading
2026-03-22 · pass · 24-9
Member-level votes (47)
- Mr. President: yes
- Feldman: yes
- Hester: yes
- Kramer: yes
- Washington, A.: yes
- Augustine: yes
- Gile: yes
- Hettleman: yes
- Lam: yes
- Washington, M.: yes
- Beidle: yes
- Guzzone: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Lewis Young: yes
- Watson: yes
- Brooks: yes
- Harris: yes
- Kagan: yes
- McCray: yes
- Zucker: yes
- Ellis: yes
- Hayes: yes
- King: yes
- Rosapepe: yes
- Bailey: no
- Corderman: no
- Hershey: no
- Mautz: no
- Salling: no
- Carozza: no
- Gallion: no
- Jennings: no
- Ready: no
- Attar: absent
- Folden: absent
- Love: absent
- Simonaire: absent
- Waldstreicher: absent
- Benson: absent
- Henson: absent
- McKay: absent
- Smith: absent
- West: absent
- Charles: absent
- James: absent
- Muse: absent
- Sydnor: absent
Related bills
- Companion bill: SB 649
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:23:32.621655Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=MD&identifier=HB 969. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.