MD HB 83
died on adjournmentFamily and Law Enforcement Protection Act
Maryland · 2026 Regular Session · lower
Quick answers
Did MD HB 83 pass?
No. MD HB 83 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-03-23): Referred Judicial Proceedings
What is MD HB 83 about?
MD HB 83 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “Family and Law Enforcement Protection Act”.
Who sponsors MD HB 83?
Conaway, Woods, Moon and 6 others are the primary sponsors of MD HB 83.
- Introduced
- 2025-10-28
- Latest action
- 2026-03-23 — Referred Judicial Proceedings
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Sponsors
- Conawayprimary
- Woodsprimary
- Moonprimary
- Taylorprimary
- Simpsonprimary
- Simmonsprimary
- Morenoprimary
- Embryprimary
- Bartlettprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2025-10-28
Pre-filed
introduction
2026-01-14
First Reading Judiciary
referral-committee
2026-01-16
Hearing 1/29 at 2:00 p.m.
2026-03-20
Favorable with Amendments Report by Judiciary
committee-passage-favorable
2026-03-20
Favorable with Amendments {
committee-passage-favorable
2026-03-20
Second Reading Passed with Amendments
2026-03-21
Third Reading Passed
passage
2026-03-23
Referred Judicial Proceedings
referral-committee
Versions
Documents
Votes
On Third Reading
2026-03-09 · pass · 89-32
Member-level votes (141)
- Speaker: yes
- Ebersole: yes
- Korman: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Taylor: yes
- Acevero: yes
- Feldmark: yes
- Lewis: yes
- Rosenberg: yes
- Terrasa: yes
- Allen: yes
- Fennell: yes
- Lopez: yes
- Ross: yes
- Toles: yes
- Amprey: yes
- Foley: yes
- Martinez: yes
- Ruff: yes
- Turner: yes
- Bagnall: yes
- Forbes: yes
- McCaskill: yes
- Ruth: yes
- Valderrama: yes
- Barnes: yes
- Fraser-Hidalgo: yes
- Mireku-North: yes
- Sample-Hughes: yes
- Vogel: yes
- Bartlett: yes
- Guyton: yes
- Moon: yes
- Schindler: yes
- Watson: yes
- Behler: yes
- Guzzone: yes
- Moreno: yes
- Schmidt: yes
- Wells: yes
- Bhandari: yes
- Harrison: yes
- Odom: yes
- Shetty: yes
- White Holland: yes
- Boyce: yes
- Healey: yes
- Palakovich Carr: yes
- Simmons: yes
- Wilkins: yes
- Cardin: yes
- Hill: yes
- Pasteur: yes
- Simpson: yes
- Williams: yes
- Chang: yes
- Holmes: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Smith: yes
- Wolek: yes
- Charkoudian: yes
- Ivey: yes
- Phillips: yes
- Solomon: yes
- Woods: yes
- Clippinger: yes
- Johnson, A.: yes
- Pruski: yes
- Spiegel: yes
- Woorman: yes
- Coley: yes
- Jones, D.: yes
- Qi: yes
- Stein: yes
- Wu: yes
- Conaway: yes
- Kaiser: yes
- Queen: yes
- Stewart: yes
- Young: yes
- Crutchfield: yes
- Kaufman: yes
- Roberson: yes
- Stinnett: yes
- Ziegler: yes
- Cullison: yes
- Kerr: yes
- Roberts: yes
- Taveras: yes
- Adams: no
- Fisher: no
- Jacobs: no
- Morgan, M.: no
- Rose: no
- Anderson: no
- Ghrist: no
- Kipke: no
- Morgan, T.: no
- Stonko: no
- Arentz: no
- Grammer: no
- Mangione: no
- Nawrocki: no
- Szeliga: no
- Arikan: no
- Griffith: no
- McComas: no
- Nkongolo: no
- Tomlinson: no
- Beauchamp: no
- Hartman: no
- Metzgar: no
- Pippy: no
- Valentine: no
- Buckel: no
- Hornberger: no
- Miller: no
- Reilly: no
- Wivell: no
- Ciliberti: no
- Hutchinson: no
- Addison: not voting
- Bouchat: not voting
- Howard: not voting
- Lehman: not voting
- Wilson: not voting
- Alston: not voting
- Davis: not voting
- Johnson, S.: not voting
- Long, R.: not voting
- Wims: not voting
- Boafo: not voting
- Edelson: not voting
- Baker: absent
- Crosby: absent
- Fair: absent
- Jones, A.: absent
- Long, J.: absent
- Chisholm: absent
- Embry: absent
- Hinebaugh: absent
Related bills
- Prior session: HB 1050not in this corpus
- Companion bill: SB 20
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:23:32.621655Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=MD&identifier=HB 83. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.