MD SB 176
enactedVideo Lottery Facility Payouts - Intercepts for Restitution Payments, Child Support Payments, and Debts Owed to the State
Maryland · 2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did MD SB 176 pass?
Yes. MD SB 176 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-04-14): Approved by the Governor - Chapter 87
What is MD SB 176 about?
MD SB 176 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “Video Lottery Facility Payouts - Intercepts for Restitution Payments, Child Support Payments, and Debts Owed to the State”.
Who sponsors MD SB 176?
Chair, Budget and Taxation Committee is the primary sponsor of MD SB 176.
- Introduced
- 2025-09-16
- Latest action
- 2026-04-14 — Approved by the Governor - Chapter 87
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Sponsors
- Chair, Budget and Taxation Committeeprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-04-14
Approved by the Governor - Chapter 87
executive-signature
2026-04-09
Returned Passed
2026-04-08
Third Reading Passed
passage
2026-04-03
Favorable Adopted Second Reading Passed
committee-passage-favorable
2026-04-02
Favorable Report by Ways and Means
committee-passage-favorable
2026-03-25
Hearing 3/31 at 1:00 p.m.
2026-03-21
Referred Ways and Means
referral-committee
2026-03-20
Third Reading Passed
passage
2026-03-19
Second Reading Passed with Amendments
2026-03-19
Favorable with Amendments {
committee-passage-favorable
2026-03-19
Favorable with Amendments Report by Budget and Taxation
committee-passage-favorable
2026-01-15
Hearing 1/21 at 10:00 a.m.
2026-01-14
First Reading Budget and Taxation
referral-committee
2025-09-16
Pre-filed
introduction
Versions
- Chapter - Video Lottery Facility Payouts - Intercepts for Restitution Payments, Child Support Payments, and Debts Owed to the StateCompare
- Third - Video Lottery Facility Payouts - Intercepts for Restitution Payments, Child Support Payments, and Debts Owed to the StateCompare
- First - Video Lottery Facility Payouts - Intercepts for Restitution Payments, Child Support Payments, and Debts Owed to the StateCompare
- (document, no version)Compare
Documents
Votes
On Third Reading
2026-03-05 · pass · 42-0
Member-level votes (47)
- Mr. President: yes
- Gallion: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Love: yes
- Smith: yes
- Augustine: yes
- Gile: yes
- James: yes
- Mautz: yes
- Sydnor: yes
- Bailey: yes
- Guzzone: yes
- Jennings: yes
- McCray: yes
- Waldstreicher: yes
- Beidle: yes
- Harris: yes
- Kagan: yes
- McKay: yes
- Washington, A.: yes
- Brooks: yes
- Hayes: yes
- King: yes
- Muse: yes
- Washington, M.: yes
- Carozza: yes
- Henson: yes
- Kramer: yes
- Ready: yes
- Watson: yes
- Charles: yes
- Hershey: yes
- Lam: yes
- Rosapepe: yes
- West: yes
- Corderman: yes
- Hester: yes
- Lewis Young: yes
- Salling: yes
- Zucker: yes
- Feldman: yes
- Hettleman: yes
- Ellis: not voting
- Attar: absent
- Benson: absent
- Folden: absent
- Simonaire: absent
On Third Reading
2026-03-22 · pass · 130-0
Member-level votes (141)
- Speaker: yes
- Crutchfield: yes
- Jacobs: yes
- Odom: yes
- Spiegel: yes
- Acevero: yes
- Cullison: yes
- Johnson, A.: yes
- Palakovich Carr: yes
- Stein: yes
- Adams: yes
- Davis: yes
- Johnson, S.: yes
- Pasteur: yes
- Stewart: yes
- Addison: yes
- Ebersole: yes
- Jones, D.: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Stinnett: yes
- Allen: yes
- Edelson: yes
- Kaiser: yes
- Phillips: yes
- Stonko: yes
- Amprey: yes
- Embry: yes
- Kaufman: yes
- Pippy: yes
- Szeliga: yes
- Anderson: yes
- Fair: yes
- Kerr: yes
- Pruski: yes
- Taveras: yes
- Arentz: yes
- Feldmark: yes
- Kipke: yes
- Qi: yes
- Taylor: yes
- Arikan: yes
- Fennell: yes
- Korman: yes
- Queen: yes
- Terrasa: yes
- Bagnall: yes
- Fisher: yes
- Lehman: yes
- Reilly: yes
- Toles: yes
- Baker: yes
- Foley: yes
- Lewis: yes
- Roberson: yes
- Tomlinson: yes
- Barnes: yes
- Forbes: yes
- Long, J.: yes
- Roberts: yes
- Turner: yes
- Bartlett: yes
- Fraser-Hidalgo: yes
- Long, R.: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Valderrama: yes
- Beauchamp: yes
- Griffith: yes
- Lopez: yes
- Rose: yes
- Valentine: yes
- Behler: yes
- Guyton: yes
- Mangione: yes
- Rosenberg: yes
- Vogel: yes
- Bhandari: yes
- Guzzone: yes
- Martinez: yes
- Ross: yes
- Watson: yes
- Boyce: yes
- Harrison: yes
- McCaskill: yes
- Ruff: yes
- Wells: yes
- Buckel: yes
- Hartman: yes
- McComas: yes
- Ruth: yes
- Wilkins: yes
- Cardin: yes
- Healey: yes
- Miller: yes
- Sample-Hughes: yes
- Wims: yes
- Chang: yes
- Hill: yes
- Mireku-North: yes
- Schindler: yes
- Wivell: yes
- Charkoudian: yes
- Hinebaugh: yes
- Moon: yes
- Schmidt: yes
- Wolek: yes
- Ciliberti: yes
- Holmes: yes
- Moreno: yes
- Shetty: yes
- Woods: yes
- Clippinger: yes
- Hornberger: yes
- Morgan, M.: yes
- Simmons: yes
- Woorman: yes
- Coley: yes
- Howard: yes
- Morgan, T.: yes
- Simpson: yes
- Wu: yes
- Conaway: yes
- Hutchinson: yes
- Nawrocki: yes
- Smith: yes
- Young: yes
- Crosby: yes
- Ivey: yes
- Nkongolo: yes
- Solomon: yes
- Ziegler: yes
- Bouchat: not voting
- Chisholm: not voting
- Ghrist: not voting
- White Holland: not voting
- Wilson: not voting
- Alston: absent
- Grammer: absent
- Jones, A.: absent
- Metzgar: absent
- Williams: absent
- Boafo: absent
Related bills
- Companion bill: HB 289
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:23:32.621655Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=MD&identifier=SB 176. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.